AN AUTHORING ARCHITECTURE FOR ANNOTATING EDUCATIONAL CONTENTS - Domain, Sequencing and Content-Repository Ontologies

José M. Gascueña, Antonio Fernández-Caballero, Pascual Gónzalez

2007

Abstract

E-learning platforms available nowadays are mainly centred in supporting management tasks, but they do not include or even consider in a too satisfactory way the adaptation to student’s profile, the reusability of educational materials, or the efficient search into educational materials. By combining the paradigms of ontologies and learning objects in authoring tools it is possible to annotate educational contents for generating personalized material. The characteristics introduced in this paper are the learning style best suited to the student, the device used to access the contents and the skill to be developed when using the material. The general architecture of the proposed tool is fundamentally composed of three different and interrelated ontologies: domain, sequencing and content-repository ontologies, where all knowledge about which educative content is taught, how it is taught and how it is organized is respectively stored.

References

  1. Antoniou, G. & van Harmelen, F. (2004). A Semantic Web Primer. The MIT Press, Massachussets Institute of Technology. Cambridge, Massachussets.
  2. Baloian, N.A., Galdames, P., Collazos, C.A. & Guerrero, L.A. (2004). A model for a collaborative recommender system for multimedia learning material. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3198, pp. 281-288
  3. Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, Cognitive Domain. New York, Toronto: Longmans, Green, 1956.
  4. Buckley, J. & Exton Ch. (2003). Blooms' taxonomy: A framework for assessing programmers' knowledge of software systems. Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension, IWPC'03, pp. 165-174.
  5. Capuano, N., Gaeta, M., Micarelli, A., & Sangineto, E. (2005). Automatic student personalization in preferred learning categories. In 11th Conference International on Human Computer Interaction, HCI International.
  6. Dean, M. & Schreiber, G. eds. Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F. & Stein, L.A. (2004). OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/
  7. Duitama Muñoz, J.F. (2005). Un modèle de composants pédagogiques pour des cours adaptatifs sur le Web. Ph. D. Thesis, Institut National des Télécommunications, France. http://etna.intevry.fr/duitama/thesis-home/PhD-Thesis-05-04- 2005pdf.zip.
  8. Felder, R.M, Silverman, L.K. (1988.) Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 78(7), pp. 674-681. Retrieved October 25, 2006, from http://www.ncsu.edu/felderpublic/Papers/LS-1988.pdf
  9. Fernández-Caballero, A., Gascueña, J.M., Botella, F., Lazcorreta, E., 2006. Distance learning by intelligent tutoring system. Agent based architecture for usercentred adaptivity. In Enterprise Information Systems VII.
  10. FIPA (2002). FIPA Device Ontology Specification. 6-12- 2002. Retrieved October 25, 2006, from http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00091/SI00091E.pdf
  11. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), pp. 199-220.
  12. Hong H., Kinshuk. (2004). Adaptation to student learning styles in web based educational systems. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2004, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, pp. 491-496.
  13. Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D. & Devedzic, V. (2006). Ontology-based automatic annotation of learning content. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 2(2), pp. 91-119.
  14. Leidig, T. (2001). L3-towards an open learning environment. ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 1(1), article #5, 11 pages.
  15. LOM (2002). IEEE 1484.12.1-2002, Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata, (2002).
  16. McGreal R. (2004). Learning objects: A practical definition. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1(9), pp. 21-32.
  17. Peña, C.I., Marzo, J.L., & De la Rosa, J.L. (2005). Intelligent agents to improve adaptivity in a web-based learning environment. In C. Ghaoui, M. Jain, V. Bannore & L.C. Jain (Eds.), Knowledge-Based Virtual Education, Springer-Verlag, pp. 141-170
  18. Ronchetti, M. Saini, P. (2004). Knowledge management in an e-learning system. Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2004, pp. 365-369.
  19. Santacruz-Valencia, L., Navarro, A., Aedo, I. & Kloos C. (2005). An ontology-based mechanism for assembling learning objects. Proceedings of E-Learning on Telecommunications, ELETE 2005, pp. 472-477.
  20. Shi, H., Rodriguez, O., Shang, Y. & Chen, S. (2003). Integrating adaptive and intelligent techniques into a web-based environment for active learning. In Ed: C. T. Leondes (Ed.), Intelligent Systems: Technology and Applications. CRC Press/Lewis Publishers.
  21. Shimic, G., Gasevic, D., & Devedzic, V. (2006). Classroom for the Semantic Web. In M.D. Lytras, A. Naeve (Eds.), Intelligent Learning Infrastructure for Knowledge Intensive Organizations. Information Science Publishing, pp. 251-283.
  22. Silva Muñoz, L. & Palazzo M. de Oliveira, J. (2004). Adaptive web-based courseware development using metadata standards and ontologies. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAISE 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3084, pp. 414- 428.
  23. Soldatova, L., & Mizoguchi, R. (2003). Ontology of tests. Proceedings of Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, pp.175-180.
  24. South, J.B. & Monson, D.W. (2000). A university-wide system for creating, capturing, and delivering learning objects. Section 4.2 of the book The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online version http://www.reusability.org/read/chapters/south.doc
  25. Stash, N., Cristea, A., & De Bra, P. (2004). Authoring of learning styles in adaptive hypermedia: Problems and solutions. Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 114-123.
  26. Ullrich, C. (2004). Description of an instructional ontology and its application in web services for education. Proceedings of the Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for Elearning, SW-EL'04, pp. 17-23.
  27. Wiley, D.A. (2001). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D.A. Wiley (Ed.), The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

M. Gascueña J., Fernández-Caballero A. and Gónzalez P. (2007). AN AUTHORING ARCHITECTURE FOR ANNOTATING EDUCATIONAL CONTENTS - Domain, Sequencing and Content-Repository Ontologies . In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS, ISBN 978-972-8865-92-4, pages 53-60. DOI: 10.5220/0002353900530060


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis07,
author={José M. Gascueña and Antonio Fernández-Caballero and Pascual Gónzalez},
title={AN AUTHORING ARCHITECTURE FOR ANNOTATING EDUCATIONAL CONTENTS - Domain, Sequencing and Content-Repository Ontologies},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS,},
year={2007},
pages={53-60},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002353900530060},
isbn={978-972-8865-92-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS,
TI - AN AUTHORING ARCHITECTURE FOR ANNOTATING EDUCATIONAL CONTENTS - Domain, Sequencing and Content-Repository Ontologies
SN - 978-972-8865-92-4
AU - M. Gascueña J.
AU - Fernández-Caballero A.
AU - Gónzalez P.
PY - 2007
SP - 53
EP - 60
DO - 10.5220/0002353900530060