Understanding Factors Influencing Teachers' Use of Technologies in Teaching STEM

Georgia L. Bracey, Mary L. Stephen

2015

Abstract

Teachers’ adoption of technology continues to be challenging; yet, this is a critical process in the effective teaching of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Although more schools are providing technology-rich classrooms, teachers are not always incorporating the new technologies into their teaching practice in a meaningful way. In this three-year case study, we used a grounded theory approach to examine the experiences of two high school teachers working in a depressed urban setting as they began using a newly designed, innovative, high-tech STEM classroom. Data sources included semi-structured interviews and direct observation. We identified three themes related to technology use: personal learning preference, teaching philosophy, and perception of technology. We discuss these themes, highlighting examples from participants’ experiences and beliefs, as well as other factors impacting technology use that emerged during the study. These results will be of value to those supporting teachers’ integration of technology into their teaching practice.

References

  1. Afshari, M., Bakar, K. A., Luan, W. S., Samah, B. A., and Fooi, F. S., 2009. Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communication technology. International Journal of Instruction, 2(1), pp. 77-104.
  2. Angers, J., and Machtmes, K., 2005. An ethnographiccase study of beliefs, context factors, and practices of teachers integrating technology. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), pp. 771-794.
  3. Baek, Y., Jung, J., and Kim, B., 2008. What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education, 50, pp. 224- 234.
  4. Becker, H. J., and Ravitz, J., 1999. The influence of computers and internet use on teachers' pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), pp. 356-384.
  5. Bingimlas, K. A., 2009. Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 5(3), pp. 235-245.
  6. Buabeng-Andoh, C., 2012. Factors influencing teachers' adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology. 8(1), pp. 136-155.
  7. Byrom, E., and Bingham, M., 2001. Factors influencing the effective use of technology for teaching and learning: Lessons learned from the SEIR_TEC Intensive Site Schools, 2nd Ed. (2001). SouthEast Initiatives Regional Technology in Education Consortium (SEIR_TEC).
  8. Common, D. L., 1983. Power: The missing concept in the dominant model of school change. Theory into Practice, 22(3), pp. 203-210.
  9. Corbin, J. M., and Strauss, A., 1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), pp. 3-21.
  10. Ernest, P., 1989. The impact of beliefs on the teaching of mathematics. In P. Ernest. ed. 1989. Mathematics teaching: The state of the art. London: Falmer Press. pp. 249-254.
  11. Ertmer, P.A., 2005. Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), pp. 25-39.
  12. Ertmer, P. A., and Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., 2010. Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research in Technology Education, 42(3), pp. 255- 284.
  13. Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., and Sendurur, P., 2012. Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59(2), pp. 423-425.
  14. Flores, A., 2007. Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap? The High School Journal, 91(1), pp. 29-42.
  15. Hall, G.E., and Hord, S. M., 2011. Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes. (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  16. Hanson, K., and Carlson, B., 2005. Effective access: Teachers use of digital resources in STEM teaching. Available: <http://www2.edc.org/GDI/publications_SR/Effective AccessReport.pdf>.
  17. Hew, K. F., and Brush, T., 2007. Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, pp. 223-252.
  18. Holden, H., and Rada, R., 2011. Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology selfefficacy on teachers' technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), pp. 343-367.
  19. Jones, H. M., and Dexter, S., 2014. How teachers learn: the roles of formal, informal, and independent learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62, pp. 367-384.
  20. Margolis, J., Estrella, R., Goode, J., Holme, J.J., and Nao, K., 2008. Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race and computing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  21. Merriam, S. B., 2009. Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  22. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
  23. Mishra, P., and Koehler, P. A., 2006. Technological, pedagogical, content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), pp. 1017-1054.
  24. Mumtaz, S., 2000. Factors affecting teachers' use of information and communications technology: A review of the Literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319-342.
  25. Nugent, G., Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., and Adamchuck, V., 2010. Impact of robotics and geospatial technology interventions on youth STEM learning and attitudes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(4), pp. 391-408.
  26. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2009. Creating effective teaching and learning environments: First results from teaching and learning international survey. Available: http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/creatingeffectiveteach ingandlearningenvironmentsfirstresultsfromtalis.htm.
  27. Patton, M. Q., 2002. Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
  28. Pearson, L. C., and Moomaw, W., 2005. The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), pp. 38-54.
  29. Pew Research Center, 2013. How teachers are using technology at home and in their classroom. Washington, DC: Author. Available: <http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teachers-andtechnology.>
  30. Pink, D., 2009. Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Riverhead Books.
  31. Reid, P., 2014. Categories for barriers to adoption of instructional technologies. Education and Information Technologies, 19, pp. 838-407.
  32. Richardson-Kemp, and Yan, W., 2003. Urban school teachers' self-efficacy, beliefs and practices, innovation practices and related factors in integrating technology. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2003, No. 1, pp. 1073-1076.
  33. Roehrig, G. H., Kruse, R. A., and Kane, A., 2007. Teacher and school characteristics and their influence on curriculum implementation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, p. 883-907.
  34. Stephen, M. L., 1997. A study of the effects of differences among students' and teachers' perceptions of computers and experiences in a computer-supported classroom. PhD dissertation. Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO.
  35. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. M., 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  36. Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(2011), pp. 2432-2440.
  37. Wang, S. K., Hsu, H.Y., Campbell, T., Coster, D. C., and Longhurst, M., 2014. An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: Considering whether digital natives are move technology savvy than their teachers. Educational Technology Research & Development, 62(6), pp. 637-662.
  38. Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., and Abrami, P. C., 2006. Implementing computer technologies: Teachers' perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), pp. 173-207.
  39. Yin, R. K., 2009. Case study research: Design and methods. (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
  40. Zhao, Y., and Frank, K.A., 2003. Factors affecting technology uses in schools. An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), pp. 807-840.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

L. Bracey G. and L. Stephen M. (2015). Understanding Factors Influencing Teachers' Use of Technologies in Teaching STEM . In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-108-3, pages 127-138. DOI: 10.5220/0005493101270138


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu15,
author={Georgia L. Bracey and Mary L. Stephen},
title={Understanding Factors Influencing Teachers' Use of Technologies in Teaching STEM},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2015},
pages={127-138},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005493101270138},
isbn={978-989-758-108-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - Understanding Factors Influencing Teachers' Use of Technologies in Teaching STEM
SN - 978-989-758-108-3
AU - L. Bracey G.
AU - L. Stephen M.
PY - 2015
SP - 127
EP - 138
DO - 10.5220/0005493101270138