Methodologies and Tools to Support Design and Development of New Products

Ana Dias, António Abreu, João Matias

2014

Abstract

Nowadays, companies, even the small ones, need to use more efficient working methods such as "transnational." The market may still be local or regional, but the competition is global. To be competitive, companies need to develop innovative products and introduce them to the market at an acceptable price, in proper time and with a higher quality level. According to some authors, the survival strategy of the companies is related to the development of methodologies that are able to design, develop and provide, through efficient processes, innovative products and high quality. In this context, this paper aims to classify and characterize the main methodologies and tools used in new products development. This aims are supported by the graphs theory that is briefly addressed.

References

  1. De Feo, J. and Bar-El, Z., 2002. Creating strategic change more efficiently with a new design for Six Sigma process, Journal of Change Management, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.60-80.
  2. Detanico, F. B., Teixeira, F. G. e Silva, T. K., 2010, A Biomimética como Método Criativo para o Projeto de Produto, Design & Tecnologia, 02, pp. 101-113.
  3. Finster, M., 2001. From continuous improvement to continuous innovation, Quality Management Journal, Vol. 8, No.4.
  4. Christopher, M., 1992. Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Second Edition, Prentice Hall.
  5. Creveling, C. M., Slutsky J. L., and Antis D. Jr., 2003. Design for Six Sigma - In Technology and Product Development, Prentice Hal PTR.
  6. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K., 1994. Social Network Analysis - Methods and Applications, Cambridge University press.
  7. Pin, C. S., Haron, F., Sarmady, S., Talib, A. Z. and Khader, A. T., 2011 Applying TRIZ principles in crowd management, Safety Science, 49, pp. 286-291.
  8. Berdanosov, V. and Redkolis, E., 2011. TRIZ - Fractality of mathematics, Procedia Engineering, 9, pp. 461 - 472.
  9. Ulrich, K. T. and Eppinger, S. D., 2002. Product, Design and Development, 2nd Edition, Irwin McGraw-Hill.
  10. Gomes, P., Seco, N., Pereira, F. C., Paiva, P., Carreiro, P., Ferreira, J. L. and Bento, C., 2006. The importance of retrieval in creative design analogies, KnowledgeBased Systems, 19, pp. 480 - 488.
  11. Yang, K. and El-Haik, S. B., 2009. Design for Six Sigma - A Roadmap for Product Development, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill.
  12. Li, J. Y., Chen, X. B. and Zhang, W. J., 2011. AxiomaticDesign-Theory-Based Approach to Modeling Linear High Order System Dynamics, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 16, (2), (2011), pp. 341-350.
  13. Wynstra, F., Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A. e Wouters, M., 2012. Supplier Development Responsibility and NPD Project Outcomes: The Roles of Monetary Quantification of Differences and Supporting-Detail Gathering, Journal of Production Innovation Management, 29, pp. 103-123.
  14. Jayaram, J., 2008. Supplier involvement in new product development projects: dimensionality and contingency effects, International Journal of Production Research, 46 (13), pp. 3717-3735.
  15. Li, Y-L., Tang, J-F., Chin, K-S., Han, Y. and Luo, X-G., 2012. A rough set approach for estimating correlation measures in quality function deployment, Information Sciences, 189, pp. 126-142.
  16. Mendonça, M. C. L. V. and Dias, J. C. Q., 2007. Postponement in The Logistical Systems of the New Automobiles Marketed in Portugal: The Brands And Quality, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18 (6), pp. 681-696.
  17. Ghinato, P., 1998. Quality control methods: Towards modern approaches through well established principles, Total Quality Management, 9 (6), pp. 463 - 477.
  18. Sun, H. and Zhao, Y., 2010. The empirical relationship between quality management and the speed of new product development, Total Quality Management, 21 (4), pp. 351-361.
  19. Jou, Y. T., Chen, C. H., Hwang, C. H., Lin, W. T. and Huang, S. J., 2010. A study on the improvements of new product development procedure performance - an application of design for Six Sigma in a semiconductor equipment manufacturer, International Journal of Production Research, 48 (19), 1, pp. 2010, 5573-5591.
  20. Shahin, A., 2008. Design for Six Sigma (DFSS): lessons learned from world-class companies, International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 4 (1), pp. 48-59.
  21. Lee, C. L. and Tang, G. R., 2000. Tolerance design for products with correlated characteristics, Mechanism and Machine Theory, 35, pp. 1675 - 1687.
  22. Kang, N., Kim, J. and Park, Y., 2007. Integration of marketing domain and R&D domain in NPD design process, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107 ( 5-6), pp. 780-801.
  23. Santos, D., 2009. Beyond Six Sigma - A Control Chart for Tracking Defects per Billion Opportunities (dpbo), International Journal of industrial Engineering-theory Applications and Practice, 16, Special Issue: SI(3), pp. 227-233.
  24. Singh, P., K., Jain, S. C. and Jain, P. K., 2005. Advanced optimal tolerance design of mechanical assemblies with interrelated dimension chains and process precision limits, Computers in Industry, 56, pp. 179- 194.
  25. Zhang, J., e Li, S. P., Bao, N.S., Zhang, G. J. and Gu, P. H., 2010. A robust design approach to determination of tolerances of mechanical products, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 59, pp. 195-198.
  26. Hagen, M. and Park, 2013. Ambiguity Acceptance as a Function of Project Management: A New Critical Success Factor, Project Management Journal, 44 (2), pp. 52-66.
  27. Salvador, F. and Villena, V. H., 2013. Supplier integration and npd outcomes: conditional moderation effects of modular design competence, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49 (1), pp. 87-113.
  28. Huang, T-T., Le Chen, and Stewart, E. A., 2010. The moderating effect of knowledge sharing on the relationship between manufacturing activities and business performance, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 8, pp. 285-306.
  29. Dornier, P. P., Ernest, R., Fender, M. and Kouvelis, P., 1998. Global Operations and Logistics -Text and Cases, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  30. Chan, F., Chan, H., Lau, H. and Ip, R., 2006 An AHP approach in benchmarking logistics performance of the postal industry, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13 (6), pp.636-661.
  31. Ayag, Z. and Ozdemir, R. G., 2009. A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56, pp. 368-379.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Dias A., Abreu A. and Matias J. (2014). Methodologies and Tools to Support Design and Development of New Products . In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems - Volume 1: ICORES, ISBN 978-989-758-017-8, pages 167-173. DOI: 10.5220/0004764901670173


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icores14,
author={Ana Dias and António Abreu and João Matias},
title={Methodologies and Tools to Support Design and Development of New Products},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems - Volume 1: ICORES,},
year={2014},
pages={167-173},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004764901670173},
isbn={978-989-758-017-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems - Volume 1: ICORES,
TI - Methodologies and Tools to Support Design and Development of New Products
SN - 978-989-758-017-8
AU - Dias A.
AU - Abreu A.
AU - Matias J.
PY - 2014
SP - 167
EP - 173
DO - 10.5220/0004764901670173