approach is certainly exceptional in this regard since
it particularly focuses on the public service domain.
Furthermore, the concept of reusability of public
service processes is heavily documented throughout
various bodies of literature. (Ma & Leymann, 2008)
proposed a research that highlights fragmenting a
complex business process into shards that are
intended to be flexible and reusable for future
business process modelling. This research work is
enormously interesting especially the life-cycle
model for business process modelling using reusable
fragments. However, the scope of the work does not
solve our problem entirely since we focus not only
on facilitating reusability but also a robust guideline
for process customization, which add value on the
top of reusable fragments.
(Curran et al., 1997) initially proposed reusable
business processes as an approach for large-scale
enterprises. Their work has been cited in an
extensive number of research works, yet was
criticized by (Mendling et al., 2006) with
counterarguments on SAP reference model. (Heuvel
& Jeusfeld, 2007) proposed a framework with
guidelines to transform a model with reference
models in particular, the SAP reference model.
Strictly speaking, these researches are only
conceptually related to our approach but different in
terms of applications. In this paper, we narrow down
our scope to public service reusability that has not
been considered yet. The closest work related to
reusable public service has been proposed by
(Koussouris et al., 2008), in which the authors
presented a modelling view of generic processes.
Their main contribution was to support the Public
Administrations to achieve resolution of
organizational interoperability and systematically
address the Homogeneous Service Composition.
Fairly speaking, there is no solution approach
available that entails the cross-domain parameters to
support multi-modal customization.
6 CONCLUSIONS
The lack of expertise, capital expenditures, and high
cost of experts are the predominant factors that
severely preclude wider adoption of eGovernance
among public service organizations.
In the paper, we have presented a T-Shaped
cloud based solution which aims primarily at
reducing the costs and enhance the efficiency and
effectiveness related to public service design and
delivery process. The T-Shaped is expected to
influence the public administrations to embrace
electronic governance. The proposed solution is
rendered as a cloud based platform focused to
alleviate the involvement of public administrations
with many aspects ranging from consultation,
design, implementation, operation, to maintenance
of applications and IT infrastructures. This enables
public administrations to better concentrate their
efforts on improving the value of the rendered
services by relying on the T-Shaped customization
facilities.
Our proposal reflects first attempt in defining a
foundation for designing and delivering public
services on the cloud. As part of our ongoing and
future work, we will conduct empirical/experimental
study focusing on the security and privacy including
data confidentiality aspects of public services
delivered on the cloud.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work leading to this result is sponsored by the
EU FP7 as part of the COCKPIT project.
REFERENCES
Cabinet Office, (2005). eGovernment Unit: eGovernment
Interoperability Framework. Retrieved from: http://
interim.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/govtalk.aspx
Curran, T., Keller, G., and Ladd, A., (1997). SAP R/3
Business Blueprint: Understanding the Business
Process Reference Model. Enterprise Resource
Planning Series. Prentice Hall PTR,
Google App Engine (2010). Retrieved from http://
code.google.com/appengine/
Heuvel, W-J. V. D, Jeusfeld, M., (2007): Model
Transformations with Reference Models. IESA 2007:
63-75.
Heroku (2010). Retrieved from http://heroku.com/
Koussouris, S., Tsitsanis, A., Gionis, G. and Psarras, J,
(2008). Designing Generic Municipal Services Process
Models towards eGovernment Interoperability
Infrastructures, eJETA 2008.
Ma, Z., and Leymann, F., (2008). A Lifecycle Model for
Using Process Fragment in Business Process
Modelling. Proc. of the BPMDS’08.
Mendling, J. et al., (2006).
Mendling, J., Moser, M., Neumann, G., Verbeek, H.M.W.,
Dongen, B.F.V., and Aalst, W.M.P.V.D. (2006):
Faulty EPCs in the SAP Reference Model, in Proc. of
the BPM 2006, LNCS 4102, pp. 451–457, 2006.
Springer-Verlag.
Microsft-WindowsAzure (2010). Retrieved from http://
www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/.
SalesForce.com (2009). Retrieved from http://
www.salesforce.com/platform/
CLOSER 2011 - International Conference on Cloud Computing and Services Science
476