Mediator-learner Dyad
Cooperative Relationships
Gilda Helena Bernardino de Campos
1,2
and Gianna Oliveira Bogossian Roque
2
1
Dept. Education and Central Coordination for Distance learning, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro,
Rio de Janeiro, 22453900, Brazil
2
Central Coordination for Distance learning, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro,
Rio de Janeiro, 22453900, Brazil
Keywords: Pedagogic Mediation, Distance Learning, Teacher Performance, Alceste.
Abstract: This study presents results from a quali-quantitative research looking for evidence on the pedagogical
mediation influence on the academic performance of distance learning students. For the systematization of
the responses to the research question, a content analysis was performed using the Alceste method. An
explanation for the evidence of the mediation relevance to the student professional performance, following
from the dyad for cooperation concept, based on social psychology theoretical underpinnings, founded on
the philosophy of the Hegelian logic. These concepts paved the ground on which the analysis was deployed.
1 INTRODUCTION
The accelerated increase in the number of
undergraduate and post-graduate courses delivered
through the distance education model in Brazil in
recent years makes it necessary to rethink the
indicators used in the quality assessment of distance
learning courses.
This article presents the results of a research on
the actions of pedagogical mediators. We assumed
that the relationship established between mediator
and student forms a dyad that establishes a situation
of cooperation throughout the course, as defined by
Morton Deutsch (1973). This means that there is
only one goal for these participants connected in
such a way that the final goal can only be reached if,
and only if, both are able to reach their goals.
Deutsch coined the term promotive interdependence
which has been used to characterize the relationships
and connections in which there is a positive
correlation between achievement and success of
both participants (p. 20). From a philosophical
viewpoint, we believe that this positive correlation,
as well as its counterpart, the negative correlation of
competition, taken as opposites, can be expressed in
the contradiction of Hegelian dialectic (Hegel,
1812).
2 THE FIELD OF RESEARCH
The central objective of the present research was to
investigate the way students signified what is quality
in distance learning courses. To this end, we
developed a questionnaire consisting of 25 objective
questions and four open-ended questions – made
available online and protecting the identity of
respondents. This instrument was sent to all 3,828
students finishing the specialisation course
Tecnologias am Educação [Technologies in
Education], resulting in 2,117 answers.
The specialisation course Tecnologias em
Educação targeted teachers and managers selected
by the State Departments of Education (SEE) and
Municipal Departments of Education (SME)
covering the entire Brazilian territory in different
regions.
The structure of monitoring and support of the
course participants involved teachers-authors,
pedagogical mediators, educators on different nuclei
of educational technology in the country,
coordinators, technical support, secretariat, among
others. In order to academically monitor course
participants, distributed in 208 classes, a team of 110
pedagogical mediators was formed, and each was
responsible for one or two classes of a maximum of
30 students. It is worth noting that the course was
distance-learning, and the pedagogical mediator was
317
Helena Bernardino de Campos G. and Oliveira Bogossian Roque G..
Mediator-learner Dyad - Cooperative Relationships.
DOI: 10.5220/0004961503170322
In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU-2014), pages 317-322
ISBN: 978-989-758-021-5
Copyright
c
2014 SCITEPRESS (Science and Technology Publications, Lda.)
responsible for the enhancement of the learning
space, individualised attention to students, guidance
with regard to the content covered in the disciplines
by establishing a dialogue between students and the
study materials and learning assessment.
The objective questions of the questionnaire
sought evidence on the following topics: teaching
material; study guidance; student support; technical
support; study environment, and self-assessment.
For writing this article we selected part of the study
which deals with one of the open-ended questions on
pedagogical mediation: How did the Pedagogical
Mediation carried out throughout the course
contribute to your academic performance? The
procedure we chose for data analysis was discourse
analysis.
3 PROCEDURES FOR DATA
ANALYSIS
In this research, we chose to work with content
analysis through the ALCESTE software: Analyse
des Lexèmes Coocurrents dans un Ensemble de
Segments de Texte (Reinert, 2007, p. 35). Either in
the analysis of co-occurring lexemes in a set of text
segments or in simple statements in a text, “the
method's principle is simple,” writes Reinert (2007):
“The corpus to be analysed is cut into a series of text
segments and the distribution of full words in these
segments is observed: hence the name of the
method” (p. 35). The “full word,” assumed as
something meaningful, is different from the “tool
word” (“mot outil”) like, for example, the
conjunction or pronoun that acts as an aid
supporting language in discourse.
Its functionality consists in successive analyses
that seek to distribute the co-occurrence of the full
word in different text segments or in its simple
statements, taken two by two. Within the theoretical
framework which conceived and operationalised the
Alceste method, we find the fundamental
assumptions of psychoanalytic theory on the
concepts of free association and repetition, from
which the method has been gradually implemented.
The conception of the ALCESTE method leads
Reinert to Lacan and demarcates precisely what one
should expect from key-algorithms that intend to
seek significant structures, that is, configurations
signalling meaning:
Studying the meaning of an utterance, of a discourse,
presupposes that one takes into account a specificity of
meaning. It is trinitarian: meaning as sensation,
meaning as direction, and meaning as significance.
The meaning of an utterance develops dynamically
due to a reading like a braid with three strands […] the
analysis of certain corpus allows us to undo the knots
of the braid (REINERT, 2000, p. 1).
Reinert did this in order to bring these concepts
to the data table to be prioritised, without any kind
of a priori criteria, through correspondence analysis.
In practical terms, the Alceste software seeks a
pragmatic approach to the text, focused on lexical
co-occurrence, co-presence of vocabulary contrasted
to two contextual units of the corpus. According to
Lima (2008), it is not about comparing the statistical
distribution of ‘words’ in different data corpora, it
consists in studying the formal structure of their co-
occurrences in the ‘statements’ of a given corpus.
What the Alceste programme examines in the text
are not the superficial divisions resulting from the
meanings of individual words, but, as Lima (2008,
p. 89) points out, “it examines the resonances of
meanings established due to the co-occurrences of
some terms, and which appear clumped together in
certain parts of the text (discourse) at certain points.”
Later, we may observe the analysis stages or
procedures of the software.
To enable the organisation of the analysis
procedures we first needed to delimit the
categorisation of the text to be analysed, the
occurrence of which is registered according to the
categories raised and the contextual units – the
broadest part of the content to be analysed. We used
as variables some characteristics we regarded as
significant to the analysis of the questions, in this
case: the number of the individual, their gender, the
class to which they belong, and their school system.
4 DESCRIPTION OF
QUALITATIVE DATA
We identified 2,079 units of initial context (UIC),
that originated, from the analytical approach of the
Alceste software, 2,049 units of elementary context
(UEC). Of those, 85% were classified, resulting in
the hierarchisation of four classes.
From the data matrices, the program performs a
descending hierarchical classification (DHC), which
produces a hierarchical tree, the dendogram of
Figure 1, which reveals the identification of the
classes through the DHC, where we can identify two
groups. The first, formed by Class 3, and the second
formed by classes 2, 4, and 1. Camargo (2005)
explains that the descending hierarchical
classification only ends when the classes become
stable.
In the specific context of the linguistic
CSEDU2014-6thInternationalConferenceonComputerSupportedEducation
318
Figure 1: Descending Hierarchical Dendogram.
intersection with psychoanalytic theory (Reinert,
2001) there is an observation we consider important
in the assessment of the stabilisation of the process
of hierarchical descent created by Reinert for the
Alceste methodology, technically enabled by
Benzécri's (1992) correspondence analysis.
We note that Class 3 is the class with the highest
number of occurrences, therefore, it is not the
biggest in size. Class 2, in spite of having the highest
number of occurrences, is the second in hierarchy
and contrasts with Class 3. This contrast contains the
central point of this article, which consists in the
dyad between mediator and student.
The goal of the descending hierarchical
classification is to make explicit “among all possible
partitions in two classes the one which can be
considered the most significant statistically”
(Marchand, 2007, p. 63). It is an iterative procedure
– the first class analysed comprises all context units
retained, and the procedure seeks the partition in two
classes which makes the chi-squared of the table
margins reach their maximum. The most
“important” and significant class comes from there.
The same procedure is carried out with what
remained outside this class and which will again
produce two classes, one of which will be retained,
the rest reprocessed in new iterations, until the
procedure is exhausted and stops.
Within this technical framework, let us comment
on some of the main results. Class 2 is subdivided
into two classes, forming a perfect hierarchy. It is a
“bipolar hierarchy,” to use the terminology used by
Kalampalikis (2003) for this descending sequence
configuration. This hierarchy points towards the
existence of the contradiction, in the dialectical
sense proposed by Hegel, between two opposed
individuals who have a cooperative position but who
belong to a different locus from one another and
pursue the same goal. In this point Deutsch's (1973)
theory of cooperation and competition comes in,
based on the contradiction of opposites in a situation
of interdependence, operationalised in the same two-
by-two matrix we have been using. In the
cooperative situation, the correlation is positive in
the intertwining of the goals achieved by
participants. In the competitive situation, in turn, the
correlation is negative, because the intertwining of
goals achieved is based on contradiction. The
application of these concepts of
cooperation/competition in the educational context,
within the framework of the theory of social
interdependence, is exemplified by the great impact
of the work, in Educational Researcher, by Johnson
(2012).
The divisions between classes represent the
relation of proximity of pre-existing meanings
common to them. Considering the reduced words
and/or forms, it is possible to name the formation of
classes in the following way:
Class 3 – pedagogical training of mediator;
Class 4 – Mediator as the main motivator of the
student;
Class 1 – Pedagogical strategies of mediation;
Class 2 – Mediator as a “knowledgebase.”
4.1 Analysis of Class 3 – Pedagogic
Training and Mediation
Class 3 deals with essential aspects to the training of
the pedagogical mediator from the viewpoint of
students in the professional training of the
participating teachers. In this way, we managed to
identify two distinct axes in one single class. The
first axis includes the words slogans learn+,
resource+, teach+, educ+, media+, use+, class+, and
room+ [aprendi+, recurso+, ensin+, educ+, midia+,
uso+, aula+, and sala+] as those related to the
pedagogical mediator's theoretical and practical
knowledge. The second axis, in turn, includes the
radicals professional+, enrich+, knowledg+, ampli+,
reflect+, practic+, and innovat+ [profissional+,
enriquec+, conheci+, ampli+, reflet+, pratic+, and
inovador+], that are revealing of the result or
Mediator-learnerDyad-CooperativeRelationships
319
influence that pedagogical mediation had in the
professional performance of the student.
In this class, two aspects are highlighted:
Educational background of pedagogical mediator
and Influences of mediation on the professional
practice/training of the student. In the students's
conception, the pedagogical mediator, in their
training, must have knowledge on the learning
processes, didactic in distance education, and
theoretical and practical knowledge on the subject
they teach. The knowledge of the pedagogical
mediator in relation to learning processes are
intimately connected to the pedagogical and
communicational conception on which the course is
based. Within the skills that involve learning
processes, the students raised questions about the
commitment the mediator should have to student
learning.
Pedagogical mediation is the basis of the process of
teaching and learning and in a distance learning
course, and essential for the permanence of the student
and construction of knowledge (Ind_344 *Gen_F
*Turma_BA05)
With respect to didactic in distance education,
the students presented two aspects in their
statements,: the first, that the mediator needs to
know distance education how to use the interfaces
present in the virtual environment, and teach
students how to work with the environment's
interface, and enable student-mediator interaction in
the virtual environment. Another aspect to be
highlighted is the fact that many students had their
first contact with distance education and did not feel
confident in the navigation. It was up to the
pedagogical mediator to identify these students and
offer them support.
(…) it was very important, because I managed to learn
how to interact and handle the several tools and new
technological advances, besides entering the era of
digital inclusion, because I was ignorant on the subject
(*Ind_1092 *Gen_M *Turma_PB01).
Here we emphasize the importance of a mediator
who is a researcher, in the sense of always seeking
new media and new uses to share with students, as
well as encouraging them to develop an autonomous
way of learning, carrying out their own researches
according to their school routine.
The influence of mediation on the practical and
professional education portrayed by the students was
understood as reflection and performance in
classroom. The recognition of reflection as
something meaningful in the professional
performance of participants can be perceived in the
following statements:
Pedagogical mediation was precise, providing content
that brought reflection on the pedagogical
performance of each student in their working
environment, reevaluating practice (*Ind_1590
*Gen_F *Turma_RO03).
From the student's statements we can observe
that the influence of reflection was not attributed
only to the pedagogical mediator, but also as a result
of the whole course, being seen as a skill that was
developed be means of learning, collaboration, and
knowledge built during the specialization.
It is through the act of reflection that the teacher
feels the need to change their pedagogical practice
or, as was brought up by the students, their
performance in the classroom. It is not enough for
the teacher to only know how to work with
technologies, manipulate them, or include them in
the school routine and in the class plan if this
process is not accompanied by reflection. Their
performance in the classroom will not significantly
change.
Pedagogical mediation provided some didactic
innovations that facilitated my teaching practice.
(*Ind_1957 *Gen_F *Turma_SP04)
4.2 Analysis of Class 2 – Motivation
Strategies
Class 2 is hierarchically superior to Classes 1 and 4
and contains 44% of the analysed UECs. We
identified in this class UECs related to the mediator
as someone who motivates the student during the
course and about the assessment strategies used by
the mediator. We also found statements from
students who attributed to the mediator their having
been able to complete the course.
We note a division between two larger groups,
with the first one also divided (Classes 1 and 4). The
meanings present in the first group (Class 2) are: the
importance of the mediator in the conclusion of the
course, based on the radicals mediator+, essent+,
importance+ [mediador+, fundament+,
importancia+]; and the characteristics or attributions
of the mediator in order for them to motivate the
student, which we identified through the radicals
competent+, sympathetic+, drop+, congratulations+
[ competent+, compreensiva+, desist+, parabéns+];
and support from the mediator for the student to
conclude the specialisation, present in the words
slogans drop+, support+ conclu+ initi+ [desist+,
apoi+ conclu+ inici+]. In the second group (Classes
1 and 4), in turn, it became clear the meaning of the
importance of monitoring the performance of the
student by the mediator throughout the course and
the strategies used in this, considered through the
CSEDU2014-6thInternationalConferenceonComputerSupportedEducation
320
analysis of the words slogans curs+, get+, not+ and
long+ [curs+, cheg+, not+ e longo+] in their
elementary context units. It is clear that the elements
of student motivation are their affective relationship
with the mediator, assessment, and conclusion of the
course.
(…) my mediator was great. She was always attentive
to everything and very supportive, even emotionally
when difficulties arose. (*Ind_479 *Gen_F
*Turma_DF02).
Monitoring and assessment of distance learning
courses is a great challenge, especially when what is
at stake is quality of education. The course adopted a
process of training evaluation, therefore, it was
necessary to set up a monitoring structure, in which
the students were evaluated by the pedagogical
mediator throughout their process learning, carried
out a self-evaluation of their performance in the
course and, finally, participated in institutional
evaluations. According to Roque (2011), the
evaluation and monitoring of distance-education
students requires special considerations, since
distance learning, when guided by pedagogical
assumptions, aims at developing the critical
autonomy of the students. Besides, distance
education does not include the physical presence of
the teacher, which makes necessary the development
of work methods that promote student trust, enabling
the elaboration of their own judgments and their
ability to analyse them.
It is clear, from the statements of the students,
that there is a connection between mediation and
good performance in the course, even as a way to
enable its conclusion. A relationship of motivation
and affectivity through the encouragements and
support in the realisation of activities also became
evident. The item ‘course conclusion’ highlighted
the importance of the pedagogical mediator in the
completion of the course of each student. In their
oral statements, the participants managed to show
how the mediator motivated them in order for them
to achieve their goals and reach the end of the
specialisation.
The pedagogical mediation carried out during the
course contributed to my academic performance in all
possible ways. It was extremely important for my
following the course, with encouragement and
support. (*Ind_780 *Gen_F *Turma_MG01).
The student's depictions revealed the importance
of the cooperation dyad involving affectivity and
monitoring.
The subdivisions of Class 2 were named
Pedagogical Strategies (Class 1) and Knowledgebase
Mediator (Class 4). They do not represent in
themselves the explicit contradiction between their
hierarchically superior class. The Class 2 set, in
contradiction with Class 3, explains the importance
of the mediator-learner dyad.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The testimonials of the students, who are teachers in
the public school system, reveal the unfoldings of
reflection in their professional practice. Pedagogical
mediation, by encouraging the students to reflect,
also promotes the transformation of their classroom
performance, their education, and professional
development. Pedagogical mediation was perceived
by the students in the support they received during
the realisation of activities and interaction in the
proposed forums. Interestingly, the answers showed
no reference to necessary physical presence of the
mediator. Throughout the development of the course,
pedagogical mediation appears as a permanent and
individualised activity, whose objective is
monitoring the students and offering each of them
the help necessary in the learning process. Despite
the fact that the central issue of this work has
focused on evidences of the contribution of
pedagogical mediation in the academic performance
of students, looking into themselves, the actions
were viewed as important to the improvement of
professional performance – the main goal of the
course – besides being highlighted as the reason for
students to conclude the course.
Resuming the pragmatist perspective pointed out
by Reinert, the object of analysis cannot be
separated from its context. We emphasize, then, that
the situation of the pedagogical mediator and the
student is not static. The relationship of cooperation
between them is dynamic, since it is alive and
maintains direct and individual communication with
each student. The three definitions of the word
‘meaning,’ namely, sensation or intuition, direction
or motion, and significance, were demonstrated in
this paper based on the mediator-learner dyad in the
context of cooperation throughout the course,
towards professional qualification and, finally, in the
meaning of change that can be verified in the
comments from the students.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Cilio Ziviani for his
collaboration in sharing his expertise on Alceste.
Mediator-learnerDyad-CooperativeRelationships
321
REFERENCES
Benzécri, J. P. (1992). Correspondence analysis handbook.
New York: Marcel Dekker.
Camargo, B. V. (2005). ALCESTE: Um Programa
Informático de Análise Quantitativa de Dados Textuais
(pp. 511-539). In A. S. P. Moreira, B. V. Camargo, J.
C. Jesuino, & S. M. Nóbrega (Orgs.), Perspectivas
teórico-metodológicas em representações sociais. João
Pessoa, PB: Editora Universitária UFPB. Retrieved
Apr. 23, 2013 http://www.laccos.org/pdf/
Camargo2005_alc.pdf.
Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict. New
Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. Science de La Logique - Premier Tome.
Premier livre. L’Être. Edition de 1812. Paris: Aubier
Montaigne. Traduction, présentation par P.J.
Labarrière et Gwendoline Jarczyk.
Kalampalikis, N., Bauer, M. & Apostolidis, T. (2013).
Science, technology and society: the social
representations approach. International Review of
Social Psychology, 26(3), 5-9.
Johnson, Burke. Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed
Approaches Fourth Edition Educational Research,
University of South Alabama. SAGE Publications, Inc.
2012.
Lima, Laura. Programa Alceste, Primeira Lição: A
Perspectiva Pragmatista e o Método Estatístico.
Revista de Educação Pública, Cuiabá, v. 17, n. 33, p.
83-97, Jan.-Apr. 2008.
Marchand, P. (2007). Concepts, méthodes, outils. Em C.
Gauzente e D. Peyrat-Guillard (Orgs.), Analyse
statistique de données textuelle en sciences de gestion:
concepts, méthodes et applications (pp. 47-70). Paris:
Édtions EMS.
Reinert, M. (2000). La tresse du sens et la méthode
"Alceste" : application aux "Rêveries du promeneur
solitaire". JADT 2000: 5es Journées Internationales
d'Analyse Statistique des Données TeArtigo -
Referênciasxtuelles. Lausanne, Suíça.
Reinert, M. (2001). Alceste, une méthode statistique et
sémiotique d'analyse de discours. Application aux
"Rêveries du promeneur solitaire". Revue Française
de Psychiatrie et de Psychologie Médicale, 49, p. 32-
36. Retrieved Apr. 25, 2013 at http://www.uottawa.ca/
academic/arts/astrolabe/articles/art0049/Alceste.htm.
Reinert, M. (2007). Contenu des discours et approche
statistique. Em C. Gauzente e D. Peyrat-Guillard
(Orgs.), Analyse statistique de données textuelle en
sciences de gestion: concepts, méthodes et
applications (pp. 21-45). Paris: Édtions EMS.
Roque, Gianna. Avaliação de aprendizagem em atividade
desenvolvida a distância. In Campos, Gilda H.B. et al.
As relações colaborativas: desafios da docência online.
Curitiba, PR: CRV, 2011.
CSEDU2014-6thInternationalConferenceonComputerSupportedEducation
322