routes of supplying oil to Ukraine and transiting
through Ukrainian territory in order to strengthen the
country's energy security; compliance with the
highest quality standards of oil transportation services
through the territory of Ukraine; ensuring the reliable
functioning and integrated development of the
national oil transportation system through the
implementation of promising investment projects
(Mykoliuk et al., 2020).
4 CONCLUSIONS
Thus, as practice shows, the analysis of economy and
society digitalization level as a whole in different
countries should be based on the initial data of the
ranking of global digital competitiveness, which took
place in 2015-2020. The comparative assessment of
countries in this ranking should be based on the
ability to perceive and effectively use digital
technologies as a change tooling regulatory practices,
business models and society as in general. Such
diagnostics makes it possible to single out Ukraine's
place among the digitized space in the time range.
Scenarios for the development of oil
transportation companies should be based on basic,
stressful and optimistic options for possible
developments. In addition, they should be based on
the forecasts of state companies on the volume and
prices of sales of products (goods, works, services) in
2020 - 2023; forecast indicators of economic and
social development of Ukraine for 2021 - 2023,
approved by the resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers
of Ukraine of 29.07.2020 №671 "On approval of the
Forecast of economic and social development of
Ukraine for 2021 - 2023"; Strategic Guidelines of the
Energy Strategy of Ukraine "for the period up to
2035, approved by the order of the Cabinet of
Ministers of Ukraine from 18.08.2017 р. № 605-р
«On approval of the Energy Strategy of Ukraine for
the period up to 2035 "Security, energy efficiency,
competitiveness"; norms of deductions to the state
budget of the corresponding payments. Also, the
strategic vectors of development of oil transportation
companies should be focused on domestic and
European consumers.
REFERENCES
Horal L., Korol S., Havrylenko M., Hvostina I., Shyiko V.
(2020). The Management of Business-Processes
Strategic Sectors of Economy on Digital
Transformation Conditions. Proceedings of the III
International Scientific Congress Society of Ambient
Intelligence (ISC-SAI 2020), (Ukraine – Uzbekistan –
Latvia – Poland, 12-19 May). Advances in Economics,
Business and Management Research. Paris, France:
Atlantis-press, 2020. 129. 240-247.
https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200318.030
Kuprina K.A. (2016). Digitalization: concept,
preconditions for its origin and scope. Bulletin of
scientific conferences. The quality of information
services: based on the materials of the international
scientific and practical conference on May 31, Tambov.
5-5 (9). 259-262.
Halapsis, A. V. (2006). Contemporary civilization situation
and metric-ontological parameters of historical
being. Scientific Bulletin of Chernivtsi University,
Philosophy, 301-302, 95-99.
Koptelova A.K. Digitization vs Digitalization. URL:
http://koptelov.info/digitization-digitalization/
Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2019).
Prioritising SDG targets: Assessing baselines, gaps and
interlinkages. Sustainability Science, 14(2), 421–438.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0596-8
World Commission on Environment and Development.
(1987). Our common future. In World commission on
environment and development. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Gaziulusoy, A. I., Boyle, C., & McDowall, R. (2013).
System innovation for sustainability: A systemic
double-flow scenario method for companies. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 45, 104–116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.013
Independent Group of Scientists appointed by the
Secretary-General. (2019). Global sustainable
development report 2019: The future is now: Science
for achieving sustainable development. New York:
United Nations.
Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., &
Fuller, G. (2019). Sustainable development report
2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable
Development Solutions Network (SDSN).
United Nations. (2019). The sustainable development goals
report 2019. New York: United Nations.
Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary
boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate
sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2),
307–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-
6486.2012.01073.x
Williams, A., Kennedy, S., Philipp, F., & Whiteman, G.
(2017). Systems thinking: A review of sustainability
management research. Journal of Cleaner Production,
148, 866–881.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.002
Winn, M. I., & Pogutz, S. (2013). Business, ecosystems,
and biodiversity. Organization & Environment, 26(2),
203–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026613490173
Trends Google - web-application public:
https://trends.google.com/trends/?hl=ru&geo=US
Ligonenko L., Khripko A., Domansky A. (2018). Content
and mechanism of digitalization strategy in business
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE