Student’s Attraction for a Carrier Path Related to Databases and SQL:
Usability vs Efficiency in Students’ Perception - Case Study
Manuela-Andreea Petrescu
a
and Emilia-Loredana Pop
b
Department of Computer Science, Babes Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Keywords:
Database, SQL, Perception, Student, Computer Science, Gender, Expectations, Carrier Path.
Abstract:
This study explores and analyses the expectations of second-year students enrolled in different lines of study
related to Database course, as their interest in having a carrier path in a database related domain and how
it reflects the job demands from the market. The participants in the study provided two sets of answers,
anonymously collected (in the begging and in the middle of the course), thus allowing us to track how their
interests changed as long as they found out more about the subject. We asked for their experience and initial
knowledge, we found out that they are aware of the SQL and databases’ usability and importance, but they
appreciated the database knowledge will be used occasionally. Even if it was not the original scope of the
paper, we also found out that men are more interested in learning in-depth (acquiring security, performance,
complexity database related information) than women do. In terms of the participants set, there were 87
answers from 191 enrolled students that were analyzed and interpreted using thematic analysis.
1 INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, databases mean power, usage, freedom,
and plenty of possibilities in the real life. Database
(DB) plays an important role in today’s society, in all
aspects of modern life, being utilized by companies,
public and private sectors of activity, research fields
of activity, personal life, and students’ career paths.
Databases play a major role in student management
at universities all over the world.
The database impact is huge not only in the aca-
demic world, but also in the medical world (databases
that store images for medical purposes as radiogra-
phers), in the car sector (the databases are also used
for image recognition), in the military sector (there
are databases with maps), and so on, even if the clas-
sical databases evolved (NoSQL databases for exam-
ple). Because of this demand and high database im-
pact, there is a need for specialized personnel, so SQL
and database know-how become a must for the stu-
dents in computer sciences. However, the domain
attractiveness (Computer Science and/or Mathemat-
ics) for secondary schools students depends on a set
of factors: the student’s socioeconomic status, moti-
vation, performance, self-efficacy, task value beliefs,
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9537-1466
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4737-4080
engagement in Computer Science (Kahraman, 2022;
Spieler et al., 2020). Also, female students should be
empowered through direct encouragement, female-
only initiatives, and mentoring programs according to
the same authors.
We wanted to analyze the student’s perception and
their interest in following a database-related carrier,
and if the student’s interest decreases or increases
once they know more about this field of work. Simi-
lar studies involving a variety of disciplines were per-
formed by (Kinash et al., 2017) in Australia, and a
deeper understanding and relevant progression paths
were given by (Gaebel et al., 2012) and (Allum et al.,
2014) (for PhD career pathways that can involve
databases).
We performed our analysis related to the Database
course involving students from different specializa-
tions and lines of study.
The scope of the paper is to find out what are the
students’ expectancies about working with Databases
and SQL related domains and how these aspects cor-
relate with the demand in the labor market. We
wanted to find out how interested are they at the be-
ginning of the course (first survey), correlating the
interest level with DB/SQL knowledge (as some of
them have previous experience, others did not work
with an SQL statement) and if the interest changed
during the course (we performed a mid-term quiz -
182
Petrescu, M. and Pop, E.
Student’s Attraction for a Carrier Path Related to Databases and SQL: Usability vs Efficiency in Students’ Perception -Case Study.
DOI: 10.5220/0011838500003470
In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2023) - Volume 1, pages 182-189
ISBN: 978-989-758-641-5; ISSN: 2184-5026
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
second survey). We also analyzed if they prefer a
career path that involves deeper usage of SQL (or
NoSQL statements), database security, or efficiency,
or they just consider these as being of seldom usage in
their career path or future job. To find out, we asked
them open questions: R1: Do you have DB-related
knowledge?, R2: What are your expectations related
to DB course? What do you want to learn? and R3:
How do you plan to use the learned information? Are
you interested to work in DB-related fields?
Even if it was not the initial purpose of our paper,
we investigate how the students related themselves to
usability vs efficacy in using databases in men com-
pared to women.
The paper is structured as follows: it starts with
an introduction and a Literature Review section where
we analyzed other papers that discussed the same
topic. In the Methodology section, we talked about
the methods used in this survey, starting with the par-
ticipant’s set, curricula, and asked questions. Sur-
vey questions and data analysis was performed in the
section Data Collection and Analysis, where we ana-
lyzed the received responses, performed a comparison
between men’s and women’s goals and we have ana-
lyzed the job taxonomies based on public ads versus
students’ interest to work in such a position. We have
analyzed the possible Threats to Validity and the ac-
tions performed to minimize and mitigate them. The
Conclusion and Future Work section ends and sum-
marises our work and the obtained results, and men-
tions future approaches and work.
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
The databases topic proved to be important and use-
ful in the last decade, as the storage capacity become
cheaper, the databases increased their size, storing
more and more information, and bringing different
perspectives and alternatives to people’s carriers.
In parallel with computer science (and database
related knowledge) development, women’s activity in
this area increased, due to the variety of possibili-
ties to which computer science and database knowl-
edge can be applied. Different job positions appeared
to satisfy the demand from the computer science do-
main, and as more jobs were generated, women found
it easier to work in a field that was previously dom-
inated by men (Weston et al., 2019; Spieler et al.,
2020; Berkeley School of Information, 2021). The
variety of available positions jobs in database-related
field development include Database Administrator,
Data Scientist/ Data Analyst, Data Operator, Database
Migration Operator, Data Migration Manager, Rela-
tional/ Non-relational/ SQL/ NoSQL Database De-
veloper ( Azure Lead Developer Backend), Business
Analyst/ Business Intelligence Developer, Database
Manager, Software Developer/ Database Engineer,
Database Architect, and many others (for example
(Jaiswal, 2022)).
In the idea of choosing the best career path for
students, the article (Verma et al., 2017) presents an
useful and comprehensive student-centric recommen-
dation system. The article is based on the research
analytics framework and uses the three-dimensional
model for measurements integrated with the relative
weighted set generated using the Analysis Hierar-
chical Process decision system. Other guidance in
choosing the career path is given by (Hasan et al.,
2020) and presents also psychological, sociological,
and developmental perspectives. It also reveals the
needs of the individual for a sustainable future, tak-
ing into consideration external factors, internal im-
provements, path-related dynamism, and practical as-
pects. Aspects related to the idea of choosing the
desired career path with a high degree of efficiency
and a comparison between genders are presented in
(Mann et al., 2020). Digital carrier aspiration seems
to be influenced by gender, according to (Wong and
Kemp, 2018), who performed 32 semi-structured in-
terviews with digitally skilled teenagers, aged from
13 to 19 years old, and analyzed and identified their
digital interests. Creativity was identified as being a
career pathway very important and especially the girls
proved to tend to become a consumer rather than a
creator in technology. (Mckenzie and Bennett, 2022)
investigated the career aspirations of undergraduate
IT students from an Australian university, by com-
pleting an online self-assessment of study and career
confidence related to the discipline and also a sur-
vey about short-term and longer-term career aspira-
tions and prior experience. The intrinsic interest and
enjoyment of IT proved to be the best motivation to
study IT and also brought insights for career aspira-
tions, without realizing the time need it to such a job
position. Combining the presentation of an alumni
database architecture that could extract, transform and
load data from alumni LinkedIn profiles of the stu-
dents who graduated with Bachelor of Science de-
grees and Master of Science degrees with their ca-
reer trajectory, the conclusions showed, for them, the
choice of different career paths, like engineers and
managers on one side and managers and analysts on
the other side (Li et al., 2016). In the literature re-
view, there are studies with important elements and
arguments related to databases and also surveys per-
formed to obtain relevant information, from students,
professors, and different members (Dehghani et al.,
Student’s Attraction for a Carrier Path Related to Databases and SQL: Usability vs Efficiency in Students’ Perception -Case Study
183
2018; Uzun et al., 2020).
One of the most important aspects related to
databases is connected to the Structured Query Lan-
guage (SQL), which provides relevant information for
a potential user. In Computer Science and Software
Engineering, SQL skills are mandatory. Besides the
knowledge of the SQL language, pedagogical skills
are needed in education. (Taipalus and Sepp
¨
anen,
2020) presents an overview of the educational SQL
research topics, research types, publication fora, and
also some SQL teaching practices. The idea for ed-
ucational SQL research should be to include replica-
tion studies, studies on advanced SQL concepts, and
studies on aspects that are not related to data retrieval.
This study includes also teaching practices in SQL
education and a systematic map of educational SQL
research and future research agenda.
Databases include big amounts of data stored in
complex and different manners with the help of vari-
ous methods and tools. Databases can include SQL,
NoSQL, Big Data, Business Intelligence, Data Sci-
ence, or Data Analytics. (Fotache and Strimbei, 2015)
presents some of the coordinates used in processing
data and implications for the academic curricula, and
also provides arguments for the positions of Data An-
alyst and Business Intelligence to acquire a corre-
sponding level of SQL and Data Warehouses knowl-
edge.
Nowadays, there are plenty of tools and online
trainings, documents (see, for example, (IBM, 2010),
(Halvorsen, 2017)), articles, and video’s that present
in a detailed manner, aspects related to databases,
such that each of us can learn the SQL / NoSQL tech-
nique.
3 METHODOLOGY
The survey research method was used for the study,
according to ACM Sigsoft Empirical Standards for
Software Engineering Research (Ralph, 2021). The
questionnaire included two one-choice questions and
two open questions. The idea was to obtain multiple
and relevant information.
In total, there have been given two questionnaires
to the students, one at the beginning of the semester
and another one in the middle of the semester. The
idea was to measure the differences that appeared in
students’ perceptions related to a carrier tightly con-
nected to the course topic, at the beginning, when the
subject was relatively unknown to them, and in the
middle of the semester, when the subject began to
be known. This aspect can reveal the involvement
of students in database course. We repeated some
Table 1: Databases curriculum.
Curriculum
Lecture 1. Introduction to Databases. Fundamental
Concepts.
Lecture 2. The Relational Model.
Lecture 3. SQL Queries.
Lecture 4. Functional Dependencies.
Lecture 5. Normal Forms.
Lecture 6. Relational Algebra.
Lecture 7. The Physical Structure of Databases.
Lecture 8. Indexes.
of the questions to check how the student’s inter-
ests changed after they acquired Database knowledge.
The students that took part in the study were enrolled
in the Database course in different lines of study, but
the learning topics (course syllabus) were identical.
The topics for the courses are the ones given in Table
1.
The questions from the surveys have been anony-
mous and optional, a student could answer one ques-
tion, to all of them or none. Because of this aspect,
we have fewer participants in the study (students that
provided feedback) compared to the total number of
students: 87 vs 191 enrolled students. The closed
questions from the questionnaire relieved the special-
ization and the gender of the students and were used
to determine the participant groups while performing
the data analysis.
3.1 Participants
We asked a number of 191 enrolled students to partic-
ipate in the survey, from which a number of 87 partic-
ipated and provided answers.
We considered that the number of students that an-
swered is representative in terms of percentage 46%
and in terms of received number of responses. The
received number of responses is comparative with the
number of received responses from other published
studies in the computer science domain (Petrescu and
Sterca, 2022; Motogna et al., 2021). The students
asked to answer the survey were from the following
specialization and lines of study:
Computer Science - Romanian line, 84 students
from which 61 men and 23 women,
Computer Science - English line, 52 students from
which 41 men and 11 women,
Mathematics and Computer Science - English
line, 55 students from which 36 men and 19
women.
191 students were enrolled in the course, 53 girls
and 138 boys, the percentage of the enrolled girls is
CSEDU 2023 - 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
184
relatively similar for all lines of study; the women
vs men percentage of enrolled students is 28%. We
wanted to make sure that the survey is representative
for all the segments of the population, so we asked for
gender and we got 42% of the answers stating there
are girls. Due to these aspects, we concluded that the
girls were well represented in the responses received
from the target population. Women seem to be more
likely to participate in the survey.
3.2 Data Collection and Analysis
The responses used in this study have been collected
anonymously, using Google forms, thus allowing us
to see in real-time the provided answers and the time
when they were submitted. Most of the responses
were submitted on the same day (45,54% of the to-
tal number). The same students were required to par-
ticipate in both surveys (after the first course and in
the middle of the semester), and they were informed
about the purpose of the surveys and how the provided
information will be used. The surveys remained open
for 10 days allowing everyone who was interested to
participate to submit their point of view. We opted
for closed questions to be able to establish data sets
more precisely and for open questions for the topics
where we wanted to have more data and a profound
understanding. For collecting data we used quan-
titative methods: in fact, specific questionnaire sur-
veys as they were specified in the empirical commu-
nity standards (Ralph, 2021); questionnaire surveys
were used in other computer science related studies
(Tichy et al., 1995; Redmond et al., 2013; Petrescu
et al., 2022; Petrescu and Sterca, 2022). For text in-
terpretation we used thematic analysis (Braun et al.,
2019) (previously used in computer science studies in
(Kiger and Varpio, 2020; Motogna et al., 2021)), and
performed the following steps:
Obtaining the answers.
If needed, the answers were restructured and allo-
cated to other study questions, as parts of the an-
swers were sometimes better fitted as an answer
to other questions.
Determined the specific keywords.
Selected keywords were grouped into classes by
one author.
The other author verified the classification, and
did some observations; the observations were an-
alyzed by both authors and small changes were
done.
Sometimes the students mentioned their SQL knowl-
edge as an answer to the course expectations, or there
were other cases when the answer for a question was
detailing aspects of another question. Due to these
facts, we had to remap some answers (or parts of the
answers). Some answers contained one keyword, and
others contained more than one; so we decided to an-
alyze the percentage of answers where a specific key-
word appears, as a consequence, we will work with
percentages.
For the first quiz, we gathered 52 answers from
students and 37 answers for the second quiz. The
questions asked in both surveys - common question
are QC1,QC2, QC3 and QC4, in the first quiz we also
had Q1 and Q2:
QC1: Line of study (choice of Computer Science
/ Mathematics and Computer Science)
QC2: Gender (Choice of Male / Female / I don’t
want to answer).
QC3: How do you plan to use the learned infor-
mation?
QC4: Are you interested to work in DB-related
fields?
Q1: Do you have DB-related knowledge?
Q2: What are your expectations related to the
Database course?
3.3 Q1: Do You Have DB-Related
Knowledge?
This course was an introductory lecture to databases
and SQL statements, so we expect to have enrolled
students that did not work previously with SQL or
with databases. We wanted to find out what is their
knowledge level, and consequently, we had students
that did not have any SQL experience or knowledge:
”My database knowledge is practically nonexistent”,
”I have NoSQL or databases knowledge” and we
had students that mentioned ”I had an internship as
a software engineer where I worked with SQL”, ”I
currently use some of the principles at work”, ”I
used SQL queries working on a SpringBoot intern-
ship program”. However, none of the students rec-
ommended themselves to have good or very good
database knowledge. In terms of self-evaluation,
19.23% of them mentioned they don’t know SQL or
database related information and a similar percentage,
21.15% mentioned that have little knowledge. We
could conclude that the knowledge level of database
related topics was relatively low among the students
that enrolled in the course, aspects that can be corre-
lated with the fact that around 84% of them mentioned
that they want to learn databases basics.
Student’s Attraction for a Carrier Path Related to Databases and SQL: Usability vs Efficiency in Students’ Perception -Case Study
185
3.4 Q2: What Are Your Expectations
Related to the Database Course?
We found three keywords related to database basic
concepts - 84%, database administration - 31%, and
SQL learning - 58% as depicted in Figure 1. A large
part of the students just wanted to find out and under-
stand how databases are working, to be able to use
them without knowing too much about complexity,
efficiency, or security.
Figure 1: Student’s Interests.
Most of the students were aware of the databases’
role and importance and expressed their interest in
learning the basics: ”Understanding the databases
and their role in applications”, ”To know how
databases are functioning”, ”To learn to create a
database having a good table structure, the SQL
statements are not important as I can find them on
internet. We should know only that they exist, how
are called and used for, and then we could search
for them on the internet”. Even if we had a couple
of answers stating their expectations are pretty high,
as they want to be able to operate without problems
complex databases, we concluded that on average, the
student’s expectations for the course were to achieve
only basic knowledge and most of them were not in-
terested in topics such as performance, efficiency, se-
curity, and so on.
3.5 Q3: How Do You Plan to Use the
Learned Information? Are You
Interested to Work in DB-Related
Fields?
In the first quiz, 42,30% of the students mentioned
that they plan to use SQL and DB knowledge only
occasionally, as they consider DB knowledge to be
useful in developing an application: ”I want to learn
DB theory and to apply it in an application”, ”I want
to learn new things that could help me in the future”
or ”I’ll need this information when I will develop my
applications/sites”.
In the middle of the semester, in the second quiz,
27% of the students considered that the course in-
formation is interesting, and useful in every domain
appeared in 17% of the answers. 11% of the an-
swers mentioned they are more attracted to the DB
domain. However, in total, the percentage of students
that would not choose to work in a DB-related field
was 55,56%, compared to 25% in the first quiz. The
percentage of students that did not decide decreased
from 26.9% in the first quiz to 11.11% in the second
quiz, so as they learned more about databases, the per-
centage of students that don’t want to work in a DB-
related field increased. The percentage of the students
that want to work in DB-related fields remained rel-
atively the same, as the students that were undecided
made up their minds by not preferring a DB-related
carrier path, the evolution can be visualized in Figure
2.
Figure 2: DB-related Work Interest.
There is an interesting aspect related to the
Database course versus having a career related to
databases, as even if the students find the course in-
teresting, they do not picture themselves having a ca-
reer in this domain: ”I found this course interesting,
but I keep my opinion: I don’t think I’ll work in the
Database domain, but I’m 100% sure that I’ll use
them”, ”I like the idea of databases, but I don’t see
myself working in this field, not at least directly”, ”I
see it more clearly and the approach is not very com-
plex so I can acquire some confidence in this subject.
I don’t exclude working in this field of activity but I’m
not sure for now. We concluded that the number of
students wanting to work in a DB-related field was
constant compared to the beginning of the course, and
the number of students that did not want to work in
a DB-related field grew as the number of undecided
students shrunk. Also, most of the students are aware
that databases knowledge is a must when working as a
programmer, but they plan to use it only occasionally.
CSEDU 2023 - 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
186
3.6 Usability Versus Efficiency and
Complexity, Expectations in Men vs
Women
Even if it was not a study question, when we analyzed
the responses to the questions, we noticed that the
men’s answers show different expectations compared
to women’s and we performed a comparison between
them. Most of the students did not set high goals:
84% mentioned that they want to know the basics,
and only 13,46% mentioned efficiency as an achiev-
able goal, to retrieve the information from databases
in an efficient manner (fast)”. Complexity appeared
in 11,54% of the total number of answers in the re-
sponse related to course expectations question: ”I
want to learn to manage a database in a complex ap-
plication”, ”I expect that by the end of the course to
be able to administrate and manipulate a database re-
gardless of its complexity”. Security was not on the
list of priorities, only 3,85% mentioned it: ”how to
protect the data and to make a database more effi-
cient”. Integration with other applications or devel-
opment environments appeared in 9.72% of the an-
swers: ”to know how a database works, what are the
relations between them and how to integrate it in dif-
ferent programming languages”, ”how to access them
from an external programming language(C#)”. As a
note, some answers mentioned one or more aspects
related to either security, complexity, or integration,
some students were more aware of these aspects than
others, but the overall percentage did not exceed 14%
of the total answers, it can be visualized in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Student’s Interest.
Related to gender, we wanted to find out how the
students manifest their interests and we have seen
that men manifested a preoccupation for complex-
ity, security, performance, and integration more than
twice compared to women. The following figure
(Figure 4) presents the difference between men and
women (some students did not specify their gender,
and without considering them, the percentage of men
vs women preoccupation varies between 200% and
300%).
Figure 4: Student’s Interest by Gender.
In this context, other answers also raised our in-
terest, as they mentioned they expect to learn ”with-
out stress” or ”to know on an average level”. Based
on the data gathered and on their responses, we can
conclude that the students are not interested in learn-
ing databases information at a high and complex level,
preferring a more basic level. Also, men seem to be
more interested in learning more advanced features
related to security, complexity, or efficiency com-
pared to women.
3.7 Mentioned Jobs Versus Jobs
Taxonomy in Database-Related
Fields
The participants in the study were students in the sec-
ond year of Computer Science, due to this aspect,
we presumed that they would mention a larger va-
riety of jobs in their answers. However, it turned
out that they were relatively unaware of the jobs that
require SQL or DB administration skills, some of
them stating that they do not know what is SQL.
They just wanted to be able to use databases and
SQL instructions when needed, on an occasional base.
We turned to computer science literature (Bennett
et al., 2022) and technical reports (Gallagher et al.,
2022; Djumalieva1 and Sleeman, 2018) that evalu-
ated the jobs and the required skills based on the
job ads. In (Bennett et al., 2022), SQL skills ap-
peared tightly related to ”Programming language or
specialized software, Java, SQL, Python”, technical
reports (Gallagher et al., 2022) mentioned only one
job related to SQL and databases: ’SQL Database
Administrator’ that appeared in 0.49% of announce-
ments. (Djumalieva1 and Sleeman, 2018) performed
a more detailed analysis of the job taxonomy and re-
quired skills, SQL skills appear in 8.37% proportion
of unique job adverts, SQLite appeared in 0.17%, and
Student’s Attraction for a Carrier Path Related to Databases and SQL: Usability vs Efficiency in Students’ Perception -Case Study
187
it was related to application development. Related
to BI (Business Intelligence) and Data warehousing,
jobs like java developer, data architect, consultant,
analyst, and Oracle developer required database ad-
ministration skills; the ads were in 1.37% proportion.
There are also Data Engineer related jobs (NoSQL,
optimization, MongoDB, or PostgreSQL skills are re-
quired), but the percentage is relatively low: 0.72%
compared to software development ads proportion:
5.29%.
Based on these results, it seems that students man-
aged to focus on the most important part - SQL
knowledge in trend with the labor market demand.
4 THREATS TO VALIDITY
We paid attention to mitigate the validity risk, and
based on the guidelines defined in (Ralph, 2021), we
decided to focus and analyze the following topics: tar-
get participant set, participants selection, contingency
actions for drop-outs, and we also took into consider-
ation research ethics.
The target participant set was represented by a
group of students enrolled in the database course
in different specializations (Computer Science and
Mathematics and Computer Science) and in different
lines of study (Romanian and English). The partic-
ipant selection was done using groups of study, and
the student’s grouping was done in alphabetical or-
der. After the groups were randomly selected, there
was no other participant selection, so all the students
belonging to the study groups were included in our
study. Thus there were no threats related to the par-
ticipant set or participant selection.
As participation in the study was optional, our
methods to enlarge the participation were limited; ex-
cept for explaining the survey purpose and asking stu-
dents to participate, there was not much we could do.
We could not enforce participation, even though it
was lower in the second survey compared to the first
one (37 versus 52 responses).
As for research ethics, we informed the students
about the purpose of the questionnaire survey, and
about the fact it is optional (proved by response rates).
The survey questions were not mandatory, so a stu-
dent could answer only one or could answer all the
questions.
We had to address the possibility that our ap-
proach to data processing was a subjective one. We
tried to mitigate the risk by following the recommen-
dation for data processing and, as authors, by check-
ing each other’s work.
5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE
WORK
We planned to analyze how second-year students en-
rolled in Computer Science and Mathematics and
Computer Science, perceived the SQL and databases
importance and how attracted are they to work in a
related domain. Even if a number of 191 students
participated in the course, only a part of them ef-
fectively participated in the survey by providing an-
swers. We asked for their expectation and interest to
work in a database-related field at the beginning of
the course and we checked their interest in the mid-
dle of the course. We tried to eliminate all the pos-
sible threats to validity by having a diverse set of
participants (in terms of line of study and gender -
all students enrolled in the course could participate
if they wanted), an anonymous survey, and analyz-
ing the text responses as recommended by commu-
nity standards. We found out that they wanted to
learn SQL at a medium level. By the middle of the
semester, students that were undecided at the begin-
ning of the course, mentioned that they did not want
a job related to databases (DB administrator, SQL de-
veloper, and so on). Their options for following a car-
rier path in database-related domains match the job
offerings from the market. Even if was not the pur-
pose of the paper, we found out that men are more
interested in accumulating knowledge and having a
more profound understanding of the concepts in as-
pects related to security, complexity, and efficiency
compared to women. In the future, we plan to find out
if the same trend in gender differences persists at the
end of the course and to verify these aspects in other
courses, and to extrapolate this study to the university
degree as a whole.
FUNDING
The publication of this article was supported by the
2022 Development Fund of the Babes¸-Bolyai Univer-
sity.
REFERENCES
Allum, J., Kent, J., and McCarthy, M. (2014). Understand-
ing phd career pathways for program improvement: A
cgs report.
Bennett, F., Escudero, V., Liepmann, H., and Podjanin, A.
(2022). Using online vacancy and job applicants’ data
to study skills dynamics.
CSEDU 2023 - 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
188
Berkeley School of Information (2021). Changing the
curve: Women in computing.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., and Terry, G. (2019).
Thematic Analysis, pages 843–860. Springer Singa-
pore.
Dehghani, N., Asnafi, A., and Hajizeinolabedini, M. (2018).
A survey on using online database by faculty members
and graduate students at shahid beheshti university.
Djumalieva1, J. and Sleeman, C. (2018). An open and
data-driven taxonomy of skills extracted from online
job adverts. Economic Statistics Centre of Excel-
lence (ESCoE) Discussion Papers ESCoE DP-2018-
13, Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ES-
CoE).
Fotache, M. and Strimbei, C. (2015). Sql and data anal-
ysis. some implications for data analysits and higher
education. Procedia Economics and Finance; 7th In-
ternational Conference on Globalization and Higher
Education in Economics and Business Administration,
GEBA 2013, 20:243–251.
Gaebel, M., Hauschildt, K., M
¨
uhleck, K., and Smidt, H.
(2012). Tracking Learners’ and Graduates’ Progres-
sion Paths TRACKIT. EUA Publications.
Gallagher, E., Kerle, I., Sleeman, C., and Richardson, G.
(2022). A new approach to building a skills taxonomy.
Economic Statistics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE)
Technical Reports ESCOE-TR-16, Economic Statis-
tics Centre of Excellence (ESCoE).
Halvorsen, H.-P. (2017). Structured Query Language.
Hasan, H., Hussain, M., Niazi, A., Hoshino, Y., Azam, A.,
and Kazmi, A. S. (2020). Career path decisions and
sustainable options. MDPI, Sustainability, 14(17):1–
16.
IBM (2010). IBM - Database SQL programming 7.1.
Jaiswal, S. (2022). The best sql jobs in 2022: Unlock new
career paths with sql.
Kahraman, N. (2022). Middle school boys’ and girls’ career
aspirations in science and mathematics. BO
˘
GAZ
˙
IC¸
˙
I
University Journal of Education, 39:1–30.
Kiger, M. E. and Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis
of qualitative data: Amee guide no. 131. Medical
Teacher, 42(8):846–854.
Kinash, S., Crane, L., Capper, J., Young, M., and Stark,
A. (2017). When do university students and gradu-
ates know what careers they want: A research-derived
framework. Journal of Teaching and Learning for
Graduate Employability, 8:3.
Li, L., Zheng, J., Peltsverger, S., and Zhang, C. (2016).
Career trajectory analysis of information technology
alumni: A linkedin perspective. pages 2–6.
Mann, A., Denis, V., Schleicher, A., Ekhtiari, H., Forsyth,
T., Liu, E., and Chambers, N. (2020). Dream jobs?
teenagers’ career aspirations and the future of work.
Mckenzie, S. and Bennett, D. (2022). Understanding the ca-
reer interests of information technology (it) students:
a focus on choice of major and career aspirations. Ed-
ucation and Information Technologies, pages 1–15.
Motogna, S., Suciu, D., and Molnar, A.-J. (2021). Inves-
tigating student insight in software engineering team
projects. In Proceedings of the 16th International
Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to
Software Engineering - ENASE,, pages 362–371. IN-
STICC, SciTePress.
Petrescu, M. A., Borza, D. L., and Suciu, D. M.
(2022). Findings from teaching entrepreneurship to
undergraduate multidisciplinary students: case study.
EASEAI 2022: Proceedings of the 4th International
Workshop on Education through Advanced Software
Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, November
2022, pages 25–32.
Petrescu, M. A. and Sterca, A. (2022). Agile methodology
in online learning and how it can improve communi-
cation. a case study. pages 542–549.
Ralph, P. (2021). ACM Sigsoft Empirical Standards for
Software Engineering Research, version 0.2.0.
Redmond, K., Evans, S., and Sahami, M. (2013). A large-
scale quantitative study of women in computer science
at stanford university. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM
technical symposium on Computer science education,
pages 439–444.
Spieler, B., Oates-Indruchova, L., and Slany, W. (2020). Fe-
male students in computer science education: Under-
standing stereotypes, negative impacts, and positive
motivation. Journal of Women and Minorities in Sci-
ence and Engineering, 26:473–510.
Taipalus, T. and Sepp
¨
anen, V. (2020). Sql education: A
systematic mapping study and future research agenda.
ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 20.
Tichy, W. F., Lukowicz, P., Prechelt, L., and Heinz, E. A.
(1995). Experimental evaluation in computer science:
A quantitative study. Journal of Systems and Software,
28(1):9–18.
Uzun, A., Onur, A., and Alabay, S. (2020). Students’
views on database management systems course de-
signed according to problem-based learning. Interna-
tional Journal of Evaluation and Research in Educa-
tion (IJERE), 9:177.
Verma, P., Sood, S., and Kalra, S. (2017). Student career
path recommendation in engineering stream based on
three-dimensional model. Computer Applications in
Engineering Education, 25.
Weston, T. J., Dubow, W., and Kaminsky, A. (2019). Pre-
dicting women’s persistence in computer science- and
technology-related majors from high school to col-
lege. ACM Transactions on Computing Education,
20(1):1–16.
Wong, B. and Kemp, P. (2018). Technical boys and creative
girls: the career aspirations of digitally skilled youths.
Cambridge Journal of Education, 48:301–316.
Student’s Attraction for a Carrier Path Related to Databases and SQL: Usability vs Efficiency in Students’ Perception -Case Study
189