Model of Building Envelope Towards Energy Efficiency and 
Adaptability as the Architectural Approach 
Tsvetelina Daskalova Ivanova
a 
Faculty of Architecture, 1UACEG, Sofia 1000, 1 str Hr.Smirnensk, Bulgaria 
Keywords:  Building Envelope, Architectural Façade, Building Skin, Model of Building Envelope. 
Abstract:  In this article we will look beyond the definition of "building envelope" as taken from the dictionary, we will 
try to consider this concept not only as a set of elements – bricks, glasses, compounds, materials, sized and 
executed after hundreds of calculations, not only as "Clothing" but as a critical review of the shaping factor. 
A  model  of  building  envelope  can  be  used  to  analyse  the  basic  parameters  as  energy  efficiency  and 
adaptability.  How  to  design  sustainable  building  envelopes  and  enhance  the  overall  building  energy 
performance through aesthetics and structural principles is a major aspect of the contemporary architectural 
design process. The building envelope could not be analysed only as a unique component but an integral 
element of while system with considerable importance regarding the building’s appearance. It should provide 
additional  functions  such  as  loadbearing  capacity,  active  or  passive  microclimate  control  and  individual 
aesthetic expression. 
1  INTRODUCTION 
Observation  needed  for  architectural  form  that 
expressed by building envelopes. If we put ourselves 
in  the role  of the  tourist visiting  a city  for the  first 
time, we will look at various historical landmarks and 
modern buildings, analysing them from the point of 
view  of  immediate  perception,  of  observation. 
Architectural forms will alternate in front of us, and 
we can perceive them only as a result of their building 
envelopes, glancing at their surfaces. If we enter the 
building, if we participate in the activities inside, we 
will be able to realize how much the created spaces 
are convenient to use, and if we have basic structural 
knowledge,  we  will  even  be  able  to  guess  their 
materials. All these observations and reflections can 
lead  us  to  different  conclusions  –  the  building  is 
beautiful  (ugly),  the  building  is  functional  (it  is 
uncomfortable), the building looks stable (I better get 
out  of  here  quickly).  Some  of  the  conclusions  are 
common and a consequence of indisputable evidence, 
while others  are quite subjective  and the  result of a 
different aesthetic views (Ivanova, 2021).  
If we analyse the architectural shape from the 
point of view of its building envelope, only the visible 
 
a
 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4660-8375 
part of the building can be observed. Characteristics 
such  as  size,  volume,  geometry,  proportions, 
openings,  colours,  reflections.  The  main  categories 
are qualitative. If we look at a wall, for example, we 
cannot  determine  its  capacity  of  load-bearing 
strength, nor is it really part of the main structure. We 
cannot define the  properties of  the  real  material,  its 
general  behaviour  under  loading.  We  also  need  to 
know,  at  least  in  general  terms,  how  the  loads  are 
transferred  to  the  foundations.  Our  building 
knowledge  and  the  laws  of  mechanics  can  help  us 
understand this.  Therefore, we  can  assume  whether 
this wall can be load-bearing or not, based on this type 
of analysis.  
On the other hand, the same wall serves to close 
or partition  the architectural space and thus it  has a 
practical  purpose,  different  from  the  role  of  a 
structural element. This function also affects some of 
the  wall  properties  such  as  thickness,  shape,  and 
openings. Even if architectural elements have a load-
bearing function, their shape must also be interpreted 
with  a  view  to  their  spatial  use  as elements  having 
both  a  structural  and  a  spatial  function.  The  final 
shape of the elements can also be influenced by the 
specifics  of  the  technological  implementation 
(Ivanova, 2021).