Expert System for the Control of Effluent TN Exceedance of AAO
Process
Xingguan Ma
*
, Zhiyi Wang, Hongyu Shi and Li Zhang
School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering, Shenyang University of Architecture, Shenyang, Liaoning 110168, China
Keywords: AAO, Process, Nitrification System, Denitrification System, TN Exceedance, NH4+-N Exceedance, Expert
System.
Abstract: Based on the mechanism of microbial denitrification and the principle of wastewater treatment process control,
an expert system is built for the purpose of dealing with the exceeding of TN standard, and the data
information collected from the equipment of the wastewater treatment plant is combined with intelligent
diagnostic means to make a technical analysis of the factors triggering the exceeding of TN standard in
accordance with the wastewater treatment logic. According to the structure characteristics of the activated
sludge AAO process, the causes of TN exceedance are analyzed step by step and the system is adjusted with
the predetermined response strategy to achieve effective control of TN exceedance in the effluent, taking a
wastewater treatment plant in Liaoning Province as an example to make a detailed diagnosis and provide a
solution.
1 INTRODUCTION
Most wastewater treatment plants suffer from
effluentNH4+-N The problem of excess TN in the
effluent, especially in winter, TNNH4+-N exceeds
the standard is more frequent, and if the process is not
adjusted in time, the light effluent NH4+-N If the
process is not adjusted in time, the effluent will
exceed the standard of TN and other indicators, and
the biochemical system will "collapse". As the
wastewater treatment process using biochemical
treatment process, the treatment effect is affected by
a number of factors, including influent factors,
organic load, process section operation and many
other elements, and in the treatment process by its
impact and complexity and uncertainty. Most
wastewater treatment plants in the management of the
lack of high-level professional and technical
personnel, wastewater treatment plant technicians
rely on years of work experience to operate, the lack
of scientific and quantitative basis, in the current
context of intelligent water (Ma, 2018) In the current
context of smart water, the establishment of a system
with alarm, diagnosis and other functions to assist
professionals in the efficient management of
wastewater treatment plants is necessary, when faced
with the deterioration of the effluent quality, the
system can be independent according to the impact
factors to investigate, through the adjustment of
process parameters to better maintain the efficient
operation of wastewater treatment plants. The so-
called expert system is a class of intelligent computer
programs with expertise and experience in a certain
field. The purpose of this paper is to combine mature
theoretical research and engineering experience
methods in the field of wastewater treatment with
wastewater treatment process control theories,
technologies and methods to achieve intelligent
control of the system by simulating human "brain
thinking" in an unpredictable environment. The
system has the advantages of The advantages of the
system are: the system can simulate the human brain
to a certain extent, so that it has the ability to self-
decision; it can monitor the whole process of
wastewater treatment process, so as to achieve the
best control under certain performance indicators, and
can provide operational guidance (Chen, 2016). To a
certain extent, it can reduce the influence of the
influent factors and environmental f actors that cause
the exceedance of the effluent index; it can also
diagnose and analyze the influencing factors that
trigger the effluent index, and quickly issue
corresponding instructions to the process section
according to the corresponding influencing factor
strategy until the effluent quality no longer
deteriorates and meets the standard. AAO process as
the traditional activated sludge method of
Ma, X., Wang, Z., Shi, H. and Zhang, L.
Expert System for the Control of Effluent TN Excedance of AAO Process.
DOI: 10.5220/0012149800003562
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Data Processing, Control and Simulation (ICDPCS 2023), pages 79-88
ISBN: 978-989-758-675-0
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
79
denitrification and phosphorus removal process to
COD removal, denitrification, phosphorus removal
three integrated functions of sewage treatment
process, and is not easy to trigger sludge expansion,
production and management difficulties; especially
suitable for large and medium-sized urban sewage
treatment projects, C, N, P elements are removed in
the biochemical pond, the disadvantage is that the
process is subject to the biochemical system within
the system of substrate competition and sludge age
contradiction and other issues It is difficult to further
improve the efficiency of nitrogen removal, and the
TN effluent often exceeds the standard in the actual
operation process.
2 ANALYSIS OF THE CAUSES OF
EXCESS TN IN AAO PROCESS
Most wastewater treatment plants facing exceedance
of effluent TN can be divided into two situations: one
is caused by effluentNH4+-N TN exceedance caused
by the exceedance of the effluent standard, and one is
the TN exceedance caused by the exceedance of the
effluentNO3 -N exceeds the standard caused by the
TN effluent exceeds the standard. The common
reasons for exceedance of effluent standard in
wastewater treatment plants are: (1) exceedance of
effluent standard due to the impact of subsequent
treatment effect caused by influent factors, and (2)
exceedance of effluent quality caused by
abnormalities in the wastewater process section. For
the AAO process, there are many factors affecting the
denitrification efficiency, for example, the
abnormalities caused by the influent include water
quantity and quality. The abnormalities caused by the
process section include DO, pH, sludge concentration
MLSS, sludge age SRT, etc. The above factors can be
divided into direct factors and indirect factors. Direct
factors are the data obtained directly through sensors,
such as water quantity, DO, pH, MLSS, etc.; indirect
factors are the indicators obtained by transferring the
data obtained from the functional sensors of the
building to the central control room and calculating
them with the computer, such as sludge load F/M,
sludge age SRT, etc. The following is a detailed
summary of the influencing factors that cause TN
exceedance.
2.1 Sludge Load (F/M)
In the activated sludge AAO process, theNH4 + -N
removal rate was negatively correlated with F/M, and
low F/M facilitated the system toNH4 + -N removal
and higher nitrogen removal efficiency. Some studies
have demonstrated that (WU, 2017), nitrogen
removal is best when the sludge load F/M is between
0.14 and 0.22gBOD5-gMLSS-1-d.-1The reasons for
this are: nitrifying bacteria, as strictly autotrophic
bacteria with good oxidative energy, require few
sources of energy in oxidizing elemental nitrogen,
oxidize elemental nitrogen more slowly, and the long
retention time of effluent in low F/M operation is
conducive toNH4+-N andNO2--N are fully oxidized
(WU, 2017).
2.2 Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT)
During the nitrification reaction, the oxidation of
nitrogen elements is slow and requires a long
residence time for full oxidationNH4+-N andNO2--N.
Relevant experiments have proved that as the
hydraulic residence time increases, theNH4+-N The
removal effect becomes better and better (Chen,
2017). If the HRT is too short, the nitrifying bacteria
in the aeration tank will be lost with the water flow
when they do not fully grow upto play a role, and the
nitrification reaction will not be sufficient and the
denitrification efficiency will not be high.
2.3 Mixture Reflux Ratio (R)
It has been shown that the mixed liquor reflux ratio
hasNH4 + -N The effect on the removal rate of TN is
not obvious, but the effect on the removal rate of TN
is large. If the ratio is too large, it will cause the
mixture containing some DO to flow back to the
anoxic tank and the denitrification will be inhibited.
The mixture reflux ratio is too small, which will lead
to the anoxic tank in 𝑁𝑂3 insufficient, and the
denitrification is not complete, thus resulting in poor
TN removal (Lv, 2016). This results in poorTN
removal.
2.4 Dissolved Oxygen (DO)
It has been shown that the DO gradually increases at
the first and end of the aerobic tank, and the
nitrification rate is accelerated, and the effluentNH4
+ -N decreases. The effect of denitrification is not
affected due to the internal reflux effect and to ensure
that the DO of the anoxic tank is <0.5 mg/L. In
addition, maintaining a certain level of dissolved
oxygen is beneficial to sludge settling, avoiding the
growth of filamentous bacteria due to low DO, which
leads to sludge expansion and thus affects the sludge
settling performance(Chang, 2016). In addition,
ICDPCS 2023 - The International Conference on Data Processing, Control and Simulation
80
maintaining a certain amount of dissolved oxygen is
beneficial to sludge settling, avoiding the growth of
filamentous bacteria due to low DO, which can lead
to sludge expansion and thus affect the sludge settling
performance.
2.5 Carbon Source (C/N)
Carbon source is one of the important factors
affecting denitrification. In the process of
denitrification reaction, denitrifying bacteria need to
consume organic matter in wastewater as electron
donor for denitrification reaction, so it needs to meet
the denitrification system C/N morethan 4. If the
above requirements are not met, carbon source needs
to be added to the wastewater to ensure that
denitrification is carried out smoothly.
2.6 Sludge Age (SRT)
Sludge age reflects the growth state, growth
conditions and generation time of activated sludge in
the biochemical tank. Studies have shown that for
AAO process, the age of nitrifying bacteria sludge
should not be <15d. The reason for longer nitrifying
bacteria sludge age is that nitrifying bacteria
reproduce slowly and have long generation time, if a
longer sludge age of nitrifying bacteria is not
guaranteed, nitrifying bacteria cannot function and
denitrification is not effective.
2.7 Temperature
In northern wastewater treatment plants, exceedances
of effluent TN standards tend to occur frequently in
winter. Low temperature is an important factor to
limit the growth of microorganisms. The suitable
growth temperature range of nitrifying bacteria is
20~40, and the suitable growth temperature range
of denitrifying bacteria is 20~40. When the
temperature is lower than 15, the efficiency of
biological denitrification will be significantly reduced,
and the growth rate of nitrifying bacteria will be
reduced by 10% for every 1 (Xu, 2017).
2.8 pH and Alkalinity
The suitable pH for microbial growth is 6.5~8.5, and
the pH of incoming wastewater from most wastewater
plants is generally alkaline. Nitrification in aerobic
tank will lower the pH and alkalinity of the system. If
the nitrification system in aerobic tank drops to pH
<7.0, the nitrification process will be hindered and
alkalinity must be replenished to maintain the pH
stability of the treatment process.
3 THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
EXPERT SYSTEM FOR THE
CONTROL OF TOTAL
NITROGEN EXCEEDANCE
With the development of big data, artificial
intelligence and the gradual improvement of
intelligent control technology, the field of wastewater
treatment already has the conditions and ability to
realize expert system control. The system is supported
by mature scientific theories, through monitoring,
collecting and storing process data, sieving and
analyzing each factor on the basis of known theories
and in line with logical thinking, diagnosing process
abnormalities, adjusting the process in time, and
containing the risk of effluent exceedance in the early
stage of budding, while also improving the quality
and efficiency of wastewater treatment. The
following will be the introduction of the TN
exceedance expert system combined with the causes
of TN exceedance andthe characteristics of AAO
process.
In this paper, the diagnostic process idea is as
follows. In order to establish the logical relationship
between the abnormal condition of effluent TN and
the cause (or influence factor) of the failure,
intermediate nodes need to be introduced, which
include influent water quality parameters, process
section operating parameters, and design standard
values (design standard range). The influent water
quality parameters reflect whether the effluent
exceeds the standard because the influent
concentration is too large leading to an increase in
system load: the process section operation parameters
reflect the operation status of the wastewater
treatment plant, such as whether the effluent is not
completely nitrification of the aerobic pond because
the DO is too low,resulting inNH4+-N exceeds the
standard; the design standard value reflects the design
specifications and standards of the indicators during
the construction of the wastewater treatment plant.
For this reason, firstly, according to the information
obtained from the inlet,outlet and process section
operating conditions along the actual measurement
data, determine whether the effluent water quality
concentration is greater than the design effluent
standard, and if it is greater than that, determine the
effluent TN exceeds the standard, then it is necessary
to check the corresponding triggering factors
Expert System for the Control of Effluent TN Excedance of AAO Process
81
according to the TN effluent exceeds the standard,
check the process parameters affecting the effluent
TN in the process section and conduct diagnostic
analysis, and finally propose a fault diagnosis in line
with the logic of wastewater treatment thinking The
system combines the principle of microbial
denitrification with the principle of microbial
nitrogen removal. The system combines the principle
of microbial denitrification and a large amount of
practical engineering experience to classify the
problem of excess TN in the effluent of a wastewater
plant into two different types of problems:
denitrification system failure and nitrification system
failure.
3.1 Abnormal Denitrification System of
the Aeration Tank
Abnormal data: effluent TN> 15mg/L, effluentNO3--
N 10mg/L, theNH4+-N < 5mg/L. If the effluent
TN> 15mg/L, you should pay attention to the aerobic
tank effluent.NO3--N If it is > 10mg/L, it means the
effluent is caused by poor denitrification.NO3--N
exceeds the standard, also can be observed by
observing the end of the anoxic tankNO3--N
concentration value is higher than that at the end of
the aerobic tankNO3--N concentration value; the first
section of the anoxic tankNO3--N concentration is
close to the end of the anoxic tankNO3--N The
concentration valueof the first section of the anoxic
tank is close to the concentration value of the end of
the anoxic tank.
The diagnosis process is as follows: The first
stage is mainly for the sudden water intake factors to
be investigated, using intelligent meters at the water
intake for pH, CODNH4+-N TN, toxic substances
and other incoming water indicators for 24 hours
monitoring, if found that the incoming water
monitoring of a certain indicator or a number of
indicators appear abnormal, or the incoming water
has an obvious irritatingsmell, color appears
abnormal color, such as green, yellow and other
phenomena are required to alarm in a timely manner,
but also with the help of microscopic technology to
determine the type, abundance and number of
microorganisms to check the impact of incoming
water factors. At this time the system issued a signal
feedback to the lifting pump, should be taken to
reduce the inlet water operation strategy, and the high
concentration of wastewater into the accident pool or
regulating pool, through all possible measures, in
appropriate circumstances in a timely manner to
reduce the impact of the system on the hydraulic
impact load, such as increasing the denitrification
pool required carbon source and chemical phosphorus
removal drug dosing, increase the amount of
dewatering of sludge dosing, extend the treatment
equipment For example, when the plant's influent
waterNH4+-N concentration is 1.5 times of the design
value, it will increase the influentNH4+-N For
example, when the plant's influent concentration is
1.5 times the design value, it will increase the influent
load.NH4+-N concentration to reduce theNH4+-N
load. As far as possible to eliminate the influent
factors caused by the impact on the effluent water
quality decline. At the same time need to cooperate
with the environmental protection department team
pollution sources to investigate, from the source to
solve the sewage treatment plant sewage exceeds the
standard problem.
If there is no abnormality at the end of the first
phase, the second phase will becarried out, mainly for
DO, temperature, pH, C/N, to check. The system first
identifies the DO value or oxidation reduction
potential (ORP) of the anoxic tank, and needs to check
whether the DO of the anoxic tank is 0.2~0.5 mg/L,
or whether the ORP of the anoxic tank is in the range
of -50mV~50mV. If the DO value of the anoxic tank
is > 0.5 mg/L, and the DO content at the end of the
aerobic tank is > 3 mg/L, it is determined that the
anoxic tank is caused by Aerobic pool end aeration
caused by excessive, then the mixture reflux liquid
will carry part of the DO back to the anoxic pool,
destroy the front anoxic section denitrification
reaction, so set the aerobic pool end DO critical value,
this critical value just will not make the anoxic pool
DO higher than 0.5mg / L, the system will be
temporarily defined as 2 ~ 3mg / L aerobic pool DO
(critical value). If the end of the aerobic pool DO>
critical value, it means that the aerobic pool is over-
aerated or the internal reflux is too large to cause the
anoxic pool denitrification is not good, the system to
obtain DO value feedback to the aeration system, at
this time, the aeration system to adjust the aeration of
the blower, the internal reflux is too large need to
recalculate the internal reflux ratio, and feedback
tocontrol the internal reflux pump system for flow
adjustment. If there is no abnormality in DO of anoxic
pool, further judge whether pH of anoxic pool is
abnormal, according to the mechanism of
denitrification reaction, denitrification produces
alkalinity, which will increase pH of anoxic pool,
generally speaking, no measures are needed to
increase pH of anoxic pool, it is enough to ensure pH
7.0~8.5 of aerobic pool nitrification system. If the pH
of the anoxic tank is abnormally high and the pH
cannot be controlled to about 7.3 for a long time, then
you can consider to add some acid to the anoxic tank,
ICDPCS 2023 - The International Conference on Data Processing, Control and Simulation
82
you can add a large amount at once, and add it several
times in a day to control the pH of the wastewater at
about 7.3 for about one to two hours, which can also
restore the system as soon as possible. If the pH of the
anoxic tank is not abnormal, then further judge
whether the water temperature is lower than the
design value, if yes, it means that the denitrification is
not good due to the low water temperature, so we
should increase the SRT or increase the sludge return
flow to reduce the influence of low temperature on
denitrification, or add steam heating device to keepthe
water temperature constant. If the water temperature
is not abnormal, then the system needs to determine
whether the C/N value of the system is less than the
design value (C/N4 to meet the denitrification
requirements (Chen, 2019; Yang. 2019). The actual
operation of the wastewater treatment plant generally
C/N>4 to meet the nitrogen removal requirements. If
C/N, it means that the denitrification caused by low
C/N is not good, and the control system needs to
choose a suitable feeding position to add external
high-quality carbon source in order to improve the
denitrification capacity of the system and other
comprehensive measures to control and restore the
system in a normal state.
3.2 The Nitrification System of the
Aeration Tank Is Abnormal
Abnormal data: effluent TN> 15mg/L, effluentNH
4+
-
N 5mg/L, effluentNO
3-
-N < 10mg/L. If the
effluent TN> 15mg/L, then pay attention to the
aerobic tank effluentNH
4+
-N is > 5 mg/L.
If yes, it means that the poor nitrification causes the
effluentNH
4+
-N exceeds the standard. When the index
exceeds the standard, the system will immediately
send an alarm to the central control room.
The diagnostic process is as follows: the first
stage is basically the same as the first stage of the
denitrification system of the aeration tank.
If there is no abnormality at the end of the first
phase, the second phase will be carried out, mainly for
DO, temperature, pH, C/N, mud age SRT and sludge
load F/M. The system first judge the DO value of
aerobic pool, through the DO analyzer online data
Water inlet and outletBiochemical
system Online monitoring information
and measured delay monito
ring data
Inflow water quality
concentration
Design
influent concentration
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Troubleshooting
Procedures for
Water Inflow Factors
Poor denitrification
Effluent nitrate
nitrogen
<10mg/L
Effluent ammonia
nitrogen
Troubleshooting
procedure for
connecting to
nitrification
system
Do not need to take any
action, and do value can be
appropriately reduced to
reduce energy consumption
on the basis of ensuring that
other effluent quality reaches
the standard
No operation is taken
to maintain the status
quo, and the internal
circulation return flow
is controlled
reasonably
It mainly analyzes a
series of non
subjective factors,
such as whether the
water temperature is
too low and whether
the machinery in the
biochemical tank is
faulty, otherwise,
human intervention
Control the
internal reflux
pump to the
anoxic tank
DO
0.5mg
Reduce DO of aerobic tank and
prevent DO at the end of aerobic
tank from flowing back to anoxic
tank
1. Select an appropriate
location to add external
high-quality carbon sources
2. Internal carbon source
(exceeding the primary
sedimentation tank in whole
or in part; reducing the
amount of carbon source put
into the biochemical tank)
Caused by large internal loop flow
Excessive DO in aerobic tank
Caused by
insufficient C/N
Effluent ammonia
nitrogen
<5mg
Nitrate nitrogen at
the end of anoxic
tank 1-3mg/L
Anoxic tank
DO
0.5mg/L
C/N
4
Identify other symptoms
of poor denitrification
caused by sludge floating
in secondary
sedimentation tank
Troubleshooting
procedure for direct
access to denitrification
system
Troubleshooting
Procedures for
Denitrification
System
Figure 1: Flow Chart for Abnormal Diagnosis of Denitrification System.
Expert System for the Control of Effluent TN Excedance of AAO Process
83
obtained DO value todetermine whether the aerobic
pool DO between 2 ~ 3 mg/L, a large number of
experimental results prove that when the aerobic pool
DO value of at least 2 mg/L to meet the aerobic pool
in the nitrifyingbacteria growth conditions (Zhang,
2015). If the DO of aerobic pool is <2 mg/L, it means
that the aeration of aerobic pool is too low caused
byNH
4+
-N exceeds the standard, at this time the
system feeds back the monitoring data to the aeration
system and initiates the instruction to adjust the
aeration of the blower to increase the DO at the end
of the aerobic tank. If the DO is normal, indicates that
the effluentNH
4+
-N is not caused by DO abnormality,
need to further check whether the alkalinity of the
effluent from the secondary sedimentation tank is <20
mg/L, if so, need to check whether the pH of the
influent water is less than the design value, if so, it is
determined that the wastewater plant is subject to pH
shock, at this time, take lime neutralization for
treatment. If the influent pH is not abnormal, the
aerobic tank pH curve needs to be observed.
According to the mechanism of nitrification process,
oxidation of 1 mg ofNH
4+
-N needs to consume 7.14 mg
of alkalinity (Zhang, 2012), if there is a continuous
Figure 2: Abnormal Diagnosis Flow Chart of Nitrification System.
Water inlet and outletBiochemical system Online
monitoring information and measured delay monito
ring data
Inflow water quality
concentration
Design
influent concentration
Y
N
Troubleshooting
Procedures for
Water Inflow Factors
Poor nitrification
Effluent nitrate
nitrogen
1mg/L
N
Effluent ammonia
nitrogen
5mg/L
Inlet water
C/N
4
Y
Whether PH has
been decreasing
N
Y
Effluent nitrate
nitrogen
10mg/L
Calculate the
required carbon
source, select a
reasonable
carbon source
agent and add it
to the aerobic
tank, supplement
the carbon
source or when
the influent COD
is relatively high,
the influent can
pass the primary
sedimentation
tank and enter
the aeration tank
Aerobic tank
DO
2mg/L
Inadequate DO in
aerobic tank
Increase DO
content at
the end of
aerobic tank
¡Ý 2mg/L or
reduce water
inflow
Caused by
insufficient C/N
Inlet water F/M is
within the design
rangeCaused by
abnormal
sludge load
abnormal
normal
Determine the
level of sludge
load, and
adopt different
methods to
adjust sludge
load
according to
different
problems
Considering
nitrogen and
phosphorus
removal,
recalculate the
sludge age
and regulate
the discharge
of excess
sludge
It mainly analyzes
whether the water
temperature is too
low, whether the
machinery in the
biochemical tank
is faulty and a
series of non
subjective factors,
or manual
intervention
Inflow PH exceeds
the design range
Alkalinity of
aerobic effluent
Calculate the
required
alkalinity, select
reasonable
alkalinity agents
and add them to
the aerobic tank
to supplement
alkalinity to
ensure smooth
nitrification
Caused by
insufficient
alkalinity
Mai ntai n
the status
quo
Access to
denitrification
troubleshooting
procedure
DO end of
aerobic tank is
1-2mg/L
Insufficient DO
at the end of
aerobic tank
No operation is
required, and the
DO value can be
appropriately
reduced to reduce
energy
consumption on the
basis of ensuring
that other effluent
quality meets the
standard
Properly
increase DO
content in
aerobic tank
Y
Identify the phenomenon
of poor nitrification
Troubleshooting Procedures
for Direct Access to
Nitrification System
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
ICDPCS 2023 - The International Conference on Data Processing, Control and Simulation
84
decrease of pH curve, it can be judged that the system
is caused by insufficient alkalinity, and alkalinity
accounting should be carried out to determine the
amount of chemical dosing. If the pH is in the normal
range, then determine whether the water temperature
caused by the water dischargeNH
4+
-N When the water
temperature is lower than 15, the temperature
becomes an important reason to limit the nitrification
rate of nitrifying bacteria. At this time, the
nitrification efficiency can be improved by increasing
the sludge reflux ratio, appropriately increasing the
aerationand extending the SRT, or installing
additional steam heating devices to keep the water
temperature constant. In addition, the influent
waterNH
4+
-N concentration is too high resulting
inNH
4+
-N The removal rate is severely reduced
(YANG, 2017). The system needs to identify the
frontend influentNH
4+
-N analyzer monitoring data
whether it exceeds 1.5 times of the design flow value,
if yes, it means the system is subject toNH
4+
-N shock
caused the discharge waterNH
4+
-N exceeds the
standard, at this time, see the first stage of the
diagnostic process. If the inlet waterNH
4+
-N
concentration is less thanor equal to the design water
volume, indicating that the system waterNH
4+
-N
exceeds the standard is not caused byNH
4+
-N If there
is no abnormality above, the system needs to
determine the C/N, mud age SRT, sludge load F/M of
the system through online and offline data, and check
the C/N to determine whether the inflow of sewage
C/N is too large, so that the proportion of nitrifying
bacteria in microorganisms is reduced. In this case,
we can increase the residence time of primary
sedimentation tank to reduce the C/N value; check
whether the mud age of nitrifying bacteria is 15 d,
and need to extend the SRT; check whether the sludge
load is within the design range. For the sludge load
F/M and sludge age SRT, as the above F/M and SRT
influencing factors are introduced, additional carbon
source, change the water intake method to multi-point
water intake method, beyond the primary
sedimentation tank directly into the biochemical tank
and other measures can be taken to change the F/M
and SRT (Liu, 2016). As described above, the F/M
and SRT can be changed by adding a carbon source,
changing the influent to a multipoint influent, and
going beyond the primary settling tank directly into
the biochemical tank.c
If each of the above impact
factors is within the normal range, it is indicated by
amalfunction of the equipment, it is possible that
the treatment structure has a short flow
phenomenon, the system triggers an alarm and
requires manual intervention to overhaul the faulty
equipment.
4 CASE APPLICATION
ANALYSIS
The treatment scale of a city wastewater treatment
plant in Liaoning Province is 10×104 m3 /d, and the
treatment process uses AAO process + amplitude flow
secondary sedimentation tank + contact disinfection
tank. This wastewater plant has been found since
December 2019~January 2020 that the effluent TN,
NH4+-N often exceeded the Class I A standard of the
Discharge Standard for Pollutants from Urban
Wastewater Treatment Plants (GB18918-2002).
Taking this plant as an example, the effluent TN, the
NH4+-N exceeded the standard problem for
troubleshooting analysis, diagnosis, and regulation.
This paper introduces the system to guide the plant for
the effluent TN, theNH4+-N The problem of excess
effluent is carried out, and the specific guidance
process is as follows.
The monitoring platform monitors the water TN,
theNH4+-N exceeds the standard, the platform
immediately issues an alarm and reports to the person
in charge. The system determines that the TN
exceedance isNH4+-N exceeds the standard, and
solving theNH4+-N exceeds the standard is to solve the
problem of exceeding the TNNH4+-N The excee-
dance is often due to abnormalities in the nitrification
system.
The diagnostic process is as follows: in the first
stage, the intake factors were first checked and the
monitoring data for two months, December 2019 and
January 2020, were retrieved. The data are shown in
Table 1.
Table 1: Actual Incoming and Outgoing Water Quality in December and January 2019.
Water quality
parameters
COD
(mg/L)
NH
-N
(mg/L)
TN (mg/L) TP (mg/L) SS (mg/L) pH (mg/L)
Temperature
()
Water inlet range 150~310 31~48 38~53 2.5~5.2 105~155 6.3~8.9 12~15
Effluent range 31~63 13~28 21~36 0.2~0.6 8~23 6.7~9.1 -
Effluent standard value
50 58 15 0.5 10
- -
Expert System for the Control of Effluent TN Excedance of AAO Process
85
The conclusions of the influent factors are as
follows: the influent COD fluctuates less, the effluent
is more stable, and occasionally does not meet the
standard; the influent TN, theNH4+-N fluctuations
are small, but the effluent does not meet the standard;
influent TP, SS fluctuations, the effluent is more
stable and basically meets the discharge standard.
The results of microscopic examination were as
follows: the mixture contained caseworms of the
genus Caspius, Trachomorpha, bell worms, cover
ciliates, etiolated ciliates, etc. The protozoa were
slightly reduced compared to normal.
The first stage of investigation concluded that
the influent water was not abnormal,and the influent
water quality was within the design range and not
affected by the influent shock load. The results of the
microscopic examination indicate that the activated
sludge is in a state of too low load. For the problem of
too low load, additional carbon source can be adopted,
adjusting the influent mode to multi-point influent
mode and improving the sludge load of the
biochemical tank beyond the primary sedimentation
tank directly into the biochemical tank. In the second
stage, first of all, DO, through DO analyzer to monitor
the anoxic pool first and last two ends DO is 0.24
mg/L ~ 0.35 mg/L, aerobic pool DO first and last DO
is 1.7 ~ 3.6 mg/L, then it means that DO is not the
cause ofNH4+-N The system was measured, and the
water temperature was basically around 13, so it
was suspected that the low water temperature caused
the exceedance. In the case of determining that the pH
of the inlet water is notcaused byNH4+-N The pH
value at the end of the aerobic tank is 6.9, and the
alkalinity of the water from the secondary
sedimentation tank is 35 mg/L. Therefore, the pH
value is also not a factor causing theNH4+-N
Therefore, the pH value is not a factor for exceeding
the standard. The design sludge load value of the
wastewater treatment plant is 0.09 kgBOD5
/(kgMLSS-d), but the actual detected sludge load is
0.035 kgBOD5 /(kgMLSS-d), which indicates that
the sludge load is too low, which is consistent with the
diagnosis of the first stage. It is proved that too low
sludge load willput nitrifying bacteria at a
disadvantage in the competition with heterotrophic
bacteria (organic matter degrading bacteria), reducing
nitrification rate and denitrification efficiency[3].
Then the MLSS value was investigated and the MLSS
value of 4500 mg/L was collected by the sludge
concentration meter. After inspection, it was found
that the MLSS increased because the sludge discharge
volume became smaller due to the sludge pump not
being maintained for a long time, and the increased
MLSS value also had an effect on the F/M value.
Through the comprehensive analysis of the
system; due to the biochemical system F/M is too low
and the discharge of sludge is too low, there are also
suspicions of low water temperature caused by the
effluentNH4+-N exceeded the standard. For the low
F/M, it is possible to add carbon source, adjust the
water intake to multi-point water intake, and increase
the sludge load of the biochemical tank beyond the
primary sedimentation tank directly into the
biochemical tank; for the sludge discharge, without
affecting the actual capacity of the dewatering process
of the wastewater plant, increase the sludge discharge
as much as possible until the sludge concentration of
the aerobic tank is controlled at 3500 mg/L. For the
low water temperature, it is possible to increase the
external reflux ratio, appropriately increase the
aeration, and extend the SRT. It should be noted that
the above operation is best to choose only one
operation for each adjustment to avoid multifaceted
regulation, resulting in confusion, so the following
regulation scheme needs to be taken in conjunction
Figure 3:
Changes
in effluent TN andNH
4+
-N changes.
ICDPCS 2023 - The International Conference on Data Processing, Control and Simulation
86
with the results of diagnostic analysis, and the
following process can be taken to adjust the MLSS:
carry out maintenance, recalculate the sludge
discharge volume, and resume normal discharge to
ensure the sludge concentration MLSS is about 3500
mg/L. F/ M: when the influent COD is large, you can
improve F/M by going beyond the primary
sedimentation tank directly into the biochemical tank;
when the influent COD is low, you need to
supplement the carbon source organic matter to
improve F/M. Water temperature: you can increase
the aeration without affecting the denitrification
reaction of the anoxic tank. These three measures in
turn, each measure and other effectiveness after the
next step. As shown in Figure 3, take the above
operation, after a period of time, the end of the
secondary sedimentation tank effluent TN, theNH4+-
N The concentration gradually decreases, and after
keeping the state for 8 hours, if the effluent quality
does not exceed the standard again, the problem can
be considered solved.
5 CONCLUSION
This paper combines the theory of microbial
denitrification principle and wastewatertreatment
process control theory to make a diagnosis and
analysis process for TN exceedance. The system takes
the data information collected from the monitoring
platformof the wastewater treatment plant as a
decision support platform and uses intelligent
diagnosis methods and technologies to diagnose and
analyze the triggering factors that cause TN
exceedance, such as whether the DO, MLSS is too
low, F/M is within the design range and a series of
other factors. The system can identify the root cause
of the problem and analyze it. The system can identify
the root cause of the problem and make adjustments
to the operation of the process section independently.
In case the TN exceeds the standard in the AAO
process, the system will issue an early warning
prompt at the first time, and then the system will start
to identify that the effluent is caused by a certain
nitrogen component exceeding the standard, for
example, the effluent exceeds the standard and then
the TN exceeds the standard.NH4+-N Then the
system starts to identify the excess of TN caused by a
certain nitrogen component in the effluent, such as the
excess of TN caused by the excess of effluent, and
then conducts a special diagnosis and analysis of the
nitrification system to solve the problem of excess TN
caused by the inlet water factor or improper operation
of the process section. With the introduction of the
process control system, the causes of TN exceedance
can be analyzed step by step according to the steps set
up in the system, and the existing methods and means
can be used to tap the advantages of the AAO process
to adjust the system, so that the aeration tank can
recover itself under the assistance and guidance of the
system and ensure the stable discharge of effluent to
meet the standard.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The first author, Xingguan Ma (1972- ), M, PhD,
Professor, is mainly interested in the research of water
pollution control theory and technology. Tel:
13050200371; E-mail: hj_mxg@sjzu.edu.cn.
[Corresponding author] Corresponding author,
Xingguan Ma, M., Ph.D., Professor, whose main
research interests are in water pollution control theory
and technology. e-mail: shihongyu0371@163.com
REFERENCES
Ma Xingguan, Xi Fengxiang, Wang Jiayi. Research on the
framework of smart rivers based on smart cities.
Jiangsu Water Resources, 2018(06): 30-32+37.
Chen HeTian, Li Wei, Ding Rixin, Luo Feng, Xie GuanTi,
Miao MingZhu. Exploring the idea of building an
intelligent operation platform for wastewater treatment
plants. Water Supply and Drainage, 2016,52(S1):293-
296.
WU Di,DONG Jingjing,YU Zhuodong,MA Ke,ZHU Liang.
Effect of F/M in aerobic biological treatment process
of wastewater. Water Supply and Drainage,
2017,53(S1):52-55.
Chen Jieyun,Yu Weiwei,Du Banghao,Yang Lun,Zhu
Jiayue,Wei Xun.Effect of HRT on nitrogen and
phosphorus removal in a combined multi-stage
A/O+suspension filler process. China Water Supply
and Drainage, 2017,33(09):31-34.
Lv Z, Dong Y, Shi YD, Xu M, Huang YC, Zhao J, Wang
HC, Qi L. Study on control optimization of A-A~2/O
process reflux system. China Water Supply and
Drainage, 2016,32(19):36-39.
Chang, M. M.. Study on the commissioning operation of
A~2/O process in a wastewater plant in Heilongjiang.
Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016.
Xu Chao,Yu Miao,Li Guanhua. Study on the operation
mode of low-temperature biological denitrification in
Taihu Lake Basin wastewater treatment plant.
Environmental Science and Management,
2017,42(08):63-66.
Expert System for the Control of Effluent TN Excedance of AAO Process
87
Chen M.F., Zheng K.K., Wang Y., Gao J.X., Wang Shuo,
Li X. Optimal operation of high nitrate nitrogen
influent in wastewater plants based on whole process
analysis. China Water Supply and Drainage, 2019,
35(17): 118-122+128.
Yang Xi. Diagnosis and optimization of AAO process
operation and regulation analysis of the second plant
of Everbright Water (Jinan) Co. Editorial Board of
Environmental Engineering, Industrial Building
Magazine Co. Proceedings of the 2019 National
Academic Conference of Environmental Engineering
(Middle Volume). Editorial Committee of
Environmental Engineering, Industrial Building
Magazine Co.
Zhang Zijie Drainage Engineering. 5th ed. Beijing: China
Construction Industry, 2015
Zhang Jing. Study on the effect law of conventional
biochemical treatment on biotoxicity and components
of petrochemical wastewater. Lanzhou University,
2012.
YANG Hong,WU Chengfeng,WANG Xiaole,GUAN
Qingkun,LIU Yi. Stable operation characteristics of
short-range nitrification under high ammonia-nitrogen
loading with immobilized encapsulated fillers. Journal
of Environmental Engineering, 2017,11(06):3369-
3374.
Liu Yifan, Chen Tao, Li Jun. Processes and operation cases
of upgrading and renovation of urban wastewater
treatment plants in China. China Water Supply and
Drainage, 2016, 32(16): 36-41.
ICDPCS 2023 - The International Conference on Data Processing, Control and Simulation
88