Is this a Good Book? The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cues for
Perceived Product Quality in Textbooks in e-Commerce
Maria Madlberger
1a
and Ruslan Tagiev
2
1
Department of Business and Management, Webster Vienna Private University, Praterstraße 23, 1020 Vienna, Austria
2
Optimus Consulting, Ivan Mihaylov 14, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
Keywords: Perceived Product Quality, Intrinsic Cues, Extrinsic Cues, e-Commerce, User Ratings.
Abstract: Previous e-commerce research has largely investigated the role of extrinsic cues for the assessment of product
quality by online consumers. In addition, online retailers are also providing intrinsic cues to reduce
uncertainties on product quality. This paper empirically investigates the role of intrinsic and extrinsic cues by
an experimental design involving the average user rating as well as a product sample in the context of a printed
textbook. The research design is a two-by-two between-subjects factorial experimental design with four
conditions (high/low average user rating, presence/absence of sample pages). The results show that the
average user rating impacts perceived product quality, however a main effect of sample availability and the
interaction effect with average user rating could not be demonstrated. The study contributes to research on
perceived product quality in e-commerce and the utilization of cues by investigating how online consumers
use intrinsic and extrinsic cues to evaluate product quality.
1 INTRODUCTION
In electronic commerce (e-commerce), the evaluation
of an offered product’s quality is based on
information that is provided by the online shop,
so-called cues. Since products cannot be physically
examined prior to order and often also consumption,
the availability and attributes of such cues are
paramount in an e-commerce setting. Numerous
studies have investigated how quality cues impact
perceptions of product quality as well as purchase
intention, perceived value, or satisfaction. This body
of literature is predominantly focused on extrinsic
cues, which can be changed without changing the
product itself, such as the brand, the product origin,
or price. In contrast, intrinsic cues which are inherent
properties of a product (e.g., physical attributes or
ingredients), are examined to a lesser extent. There
are only few studies that address the role of both types
of cues, i.e., Chen & Dubinsky (2003), Choi et al.
(2018; 2019), Hu et al. (2010), Kim (2021), and
Weathers et al. (2007). The studies that are examining
both cue types in e-commerce are using secondary
data from existing online stores such as Amazon.com
which limits the generalizability for other online
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2850-0499
retailers. Moreover, these studies do not fully disclose
how consumers are using quality cues.
The study at hand aims to empirically investigate
the role of intrinsic cues, extrinsic cues, and their
interaction in the formation of perceived product
quality, a factor that has received limited attention in
previous research. By collecting data in an online
survey in an experimental design with a two-by-two
between-subjects factorial design, the role of average
user rating as an extrinsic cue and the availability of
a text sample as an intrinsic cue of an online sold
textbook has been investigated.
The study contributes to literature on quality cue
utilization and product quality perception by
addressing both types of cues simultaneously in an
e-commerce setting. By doing so, the study provides
insights into how consumers are using textbook
samples in order to evaluate the perceived quality of
textbooks that are sold online. The experimental
study allows the disclosure of underlying motives of
online consumers’ use of quality cues in a setting
where intrinsic and extrinsic cues are offered.
Madlberger, M. and Tagiev, R.
Is this a Good Book? The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cues for Perceived Product Quality in Textbooks in e-Commerce.
DOI: 10.5220/0012165700003584
In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST 2023), pages 199-206
ISBN: 978-989-758-672-9; ISSN: 2184-3252
Copyright © 2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
199
2 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Product Quality
Product quality is strongly associated with a
company’s profitability, sales, customer satisfaction,
and loyalty. In this respect, not the objective product
quality itself matters most, but consumers’
perceptions of quality as a driver of purchase
decisions (Mitra & Golder, 2006; Steenkamp, 1990).
Several researchers note that that a buyer’s perception
of quality reflects an “objective” product quality, i.e.,
a measurable and impartial product characteristic
(Mitra & Golder, 2006). However, in an e-commerce
context where direct experience with products is often
impossible, the term “perceived quality” is more
accurate (Chen & Dubinsky, 2003).
Consumers establish product quality perceptions
by experiencing beliefs about different product
quality attributes, i.e., benefits they expect to receive
as a result of consuming the product (Steenkamp,
1990). Following the notion of the cue utilization
theory, consumers use different quality cues as
indicators when they are deciding between various
product alternatives, since product quality attributes
cannot be directly experienced prior to consumption
(Chen & Dubinsky, 2003).
2.2 Quality Cues
Quality cues are “information stimuli that are,
according to the consumer, related to the quality of
the product, and can be ascertained by the consumer
through the senses prior to consumption”
(Steenkamp, 1990, p. 312). They can be categorized
as either intrinsic or extrinsic (Zeithaml, 1988).
Intrinsic cues are inherent properties of a product and
thus, cannot be changed without altering the product
itself (Bhuian, 1997). In contrast, extrinsic cues are
not inherent to a product, however, they are related to
it (Choi et al., 2018).
Many consumers are likely to use both intrinsic
and extrinsic cues to form beliefs about the quality of
a product (Hu et al., 2010). The relative importance
of intrinsic and extrinsic cues is subject to different
conditions. Intrinsic cues are getting less important
while extrinsic cues are becoming more salient in
presence of the following conditions (Zeithaml,
1988): (1) limited availability of intrinsic cues (2),
more required time and/or effort than perceived as
feasible to evaluate intrinsic cues, and (3) generally a
difficult assessment of product quality.
2.2.1 Average User Rating as Extrinsic Cue
An important extrinsic cue in e-commerce that can
influence purchase intention is word-of-mouth of
other users (Zhou et al., 2013). Online consumer
reviews provide such extrinsic cues, since they reflect
other users’ individual product quality perceptions
(We et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2013). Hence, they are
related to the respective product, but are not inherent
to them.
Among different investigated attributes of online
consumer reviews, their sentiment is one of the most
important features (King et al., 2014). It defines a
unique nature of electronic word-of-mouth,
especially when compared with offline word-of-
mouth. Sentiment denotes positive, neutral, or
negative evaluations, whose expression is often
supported by online shops in the form of numerical
ratings. These are usually provided in the form of
5-point scales, typically organized as star ratings
which help consumers assign positive or negative
evaluations to single products (King et al., 2014).
Hence, average user ratings which are usually
provided in addition to single online consumer
reviews offer a popular extrinsic cue that is used for
decision-making in e-commerce.
2.2.2 Product Sample as Intrinsic Cue
Whereas intrinsic cues are often difficult to convey in
e-commerce settings, information goods, such as
software, music, or books (Wang & Zhang, 2009) are
valued for their content and benefit from free
sampling that can help consumers in their decision-
making process. When online retailers provide
product samples together with online consumer
reviews, consumers refer more strongly to their
assessment of the product samples to evaluate the
product quality, compared with the user ratings (Hu
et al., 2010). In the case of a book, such a sample may
consist of further product information, e.g., on the
front or back cover, sample text, or sample chapters
(Choi et al., 2019).
2.2.3 Interaction Effect
Choi et al. (2019) studied the interactive effects of
e-book samples and online consumer reviews on
e-book sales. This study hypothesizes that the
relationship between e-book samples and purchase
decisions becomes more salient as the average user
ratings decrease, because consumers tend to combine
their direct and indirect experiences in order to make
the purchase decisions, especially if the information
asymmetry is high.
WEBIST 2023 - 19th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies
200
The data set used for the study by Choi et al.
(2019) was obtained from a Korean e-book retailer
and contained detailed browsing data (e.g., exposure
to e-book previews and online consumer reviews),
transactional data, and various e-book characteristics,
including author popularity, publication date, price,
etc. Only the data on nonserial romance and fiction
e-books were analyzed. The results suggest that the
positive effect of e-book samples on purchase
decisions decreases when the average user rating
(online review valence) is high. Moreover, this effect
diminishes as the number of reviews increases.
However, the effect of e-book samples on purchase
decisions becomes more salient as the disagreement
among the reviewers (online review variance)
intensifies.
The study by Choi et al. (2019) is among only a
handful of research works that found empirical
evidence on how consumers utilize both intrinsic and
extrinsic cues to decide whether to purchase a
product. Choi et al. (2019) demonstrated that many
consumers rely on a combination of direct and
indirect product experiences, if both are available to
them, in order to make a purchase decision. However,
giving the fact that Choi et al. (2019) used only fiction
and romance e-books, the results of their study may
not hold for other book categories.
3 HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT
Previous research revealed the key role of average
user ratings as an indicator of product quality (Hu et
al., 2010), so that we hypothesize:
H1: The average user rating impacts the level of
perceived product quality of textbooks sold online.
For product quality evaluation and uncertainty
reduction, consumers are using different sources of
information, including intrinsic cues where available
(Hu et al., 2010). In an e-commerce context, product
samples of information goods serve as a reliable
source to obtain this information (Hu et al., 2010), so
that we assert:
H2: The availability of a product sample impacts
perceived product quality of textbooks sold online.
The average user rating is the collective
assessment of other consumers on a product and its
perceived quality (Hu et al., 2010). This evaluation is
the result of different individuals’ tastes and prior
experiences, turning the assessment into a largely
subjective statement (Hu et al., 2010). A consumer
may attribute the average user rating more to other
users’ experiences and not so much to the product
itself (Hu et al., 2010). Hence, consumers may look
for other relevant information and thus review an
available product sample (Hu et al., 2010). This leads
to the following consideration: If a product’s average
user rating is low, a consumer may still conclude with
a high-quality perception after the product sample has
been reviewed. On the other hand, the consumer may
also experience doubts about their own conclusions
about consumption experience after reviewing the
sample (Steenkamp, 1990). In that case, opinions of
other users, expressed in the average user rating, can
be used as a reference. Hence, we propose the
following:
H3: The interaction term of the average user
rating and the product sample impacts perceived
product quality of textbooks sold online.
4 RESEARCH DESIGN
The experimental research design in this study
follows Chen & Cheng (2013) who examine the
impact of website design and appeal on perceived
product quality, perceived information quality, and
customer satisfaction as dependent variables. In our
study, the experiment is a two-by-two between-
subjects factorial design which employs four
experimental conditions that are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1: Experimental design overview.
Sam
p
le
p
a
g
es
No Yes
Avera
g
eHi
g
h
(
4.3 stars
)
(
1
)
(
2
)
user rating Low (1.0 star) (3) (4)
Data has been collected via an online survey
among American consumers who were recruited by
Qualtrics (n = 504 after removal of incomplete
questionnaires). 32.7% of the respondents are
females, 67.3% are males. The age distribution is as
follows: 18‒24 years: 5.6%, 25-34 years: 19.3%, 35-
44 years: 20.3%, 45-54 years: 16.5%, 55-64 years:
21.3%, 65 years or older: 16.9%. 51.6% are full-time
or part-time employed, the remaining respondents are
either retired, studying, homemakers, or others.
According to Qualtrics’ methodology (Qualtrics,
2014), to ensure that the sample is representative, the
company selects at random the survey participants
from the certified third-party panels and randomizes
the respondents in every sample before the survey.
Qualtrics is taking appropriate measures to make sure
that no respondents have participated in the survey
twice or more (Qualtrics, 2014).
Each respondent has been randomly assigned to
only one of the four experimental condition. Thus,
Is this a Good Book? The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cues for Perceived Product Quality in Textbooks in e-Commerce
201
each of the four conditions has been provided to a
sub-sample all of which had approximately the same
size. All other information provided to the
participants, except for the stimuli, (e.g., product
details, the front and back cover of the textbook),
were kept constant in the experiment. Respondents
rated the perceived quality of the shown textbook on
a single-item Likert scale (1 = “terrible”,
5 = “excellent”). The scale for measuring the
perceived quality of a textbook has been applied from
Boulding & Kirmani (1993).
As a stimulus for the experiment, an existing
textbook has been used (Ian Tuhovsky: “Emotional
Intelligence: A Practical Guide to Making Friends
with Your Emotions and Raising Your EQ”;
(Tuhovsky, 2015). This textbook has been chosen for
two reasons: first, the topic of the textbook is rather
broad and not overly controversial; second, it has
received overall positive average ratings (4.4 average
user rating in 2023 based on more than 360-star
ratings on Amazon.com). This rather high average
user rating was used as a reference point for the
interpretation of the study results.
To avoid a potential bias due to the author’s name
(Amblee & Bui, 2011), the real name has been
replaced with a fictive author name. The textbook
sample text matched all details, such as the text
length, page layout, font types of the real sample
provided on Amazon.com and it also visually
resembles the samples provided on Amazon’s “look
inside” feature. The content of the sample text
included the title page of the textbook, the table of
contents, a 3-pages extract from the introduction
section, and a 5-pages extract from the first chapter.
475 of the 504 respondents were not familiar with the
existing textbook and therefore qualified to take the
survey.
5 RESULTS
5.1 Hypothesis Tests
Data analysis to test the hypotheses was done with
two-way ANOVA. In the test of hypothesis 1, the
main effect for average user rating yields an F-ratio
of F(1, 312) = 27.5 (p < .001, ƞ
p
2
= .081), resulting in
a statistically significant difference between quality
perception levels for high (M = 2.09, SD = 0.75) and
low average user rating (M = 2.66, SD = 1.04).
Hence, in case of a high average user rating,
participants rated perceived quality of the textbook as
higher, compared with participants who were shown
a low average user rating.
The test of hypothesis 2 results in a main effect for
the availability of the textbook sample of as follows:
F-ratio of F(1, 312) = 0.88 (p >.5, ƞ
p
2
= .003). Hence,
the main effect for the availability of the sample is not
significant (provided sample pages: M = 2.25,
SD = 0.85, no provided sample pages: M = 2.40,
SD = 0.98).
For hypothesis 3, the interaction effect between
average user rating and availability of the sample was
tested. This outcome is not significant either: F-ratio
of F(1, 312) = 0.001 (p >.5, ƞ
p
2
< .001). The
availability of text sample does therefore not show a
moderating impact on the relationship between
average user rating and perceived textbook quality.
The results of the hypothesis tests are shown in
Table 2:
Table 2: Hypothesis test results.
H1 (average user rating): supporte
d
H2 (sample availability): not supporte
d
H3 (interaction effect): not supporte
d
5.2 Sample Use
In the following, some further details on the use of the
intrinsic cue are provided in order to shed light on the
motives of intrinsic cue utilization. 137 individuals
were exposed to the second experimental condition
with high average user rating and availability of
sample text. 72 of them (52.6%) stated that they had
reviewed the sample, i.e., either read or have
skimmed through the text. As shown by Table 3, most
participants only skimmed through the sample text.
Table 3: Sample text use with high average user rating.
Did not
Rea
d
Skimmed
Through
Read
First page 6.9% 75.0% 18.1%
Table of contents 18.1% 56.9% 25.0%
Introduction 22.2% 65.3% 12.5%
Cha
ter 1 41.7% 43.1% 15.3%
The most important reasons for not reading the
pages of the introduction and first chapter were: “lack
of time and/or motivation”, “lack of interest in the
topic of the textbook”, and “sample length”. Other
reasons were preference to read the whole book or
preference to skim through sample text only to
determine whether the book is worth reading at all.
65 (47.4%) participants have decided not to read
or skim through the sample pages. Most of them
stated a lack of interest in the topic as the main reason
for not reviewing the sample text, followed by lacking
time and/or motivation to do so and other reasons
WEBIST 2023 - 19th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies
202
(i.e., use of the other provided intrinsic cues, such as
the book title or front cover description).
112 respondents were exposed to the fourth
experimental condition (low average user rating and
availability of sample text). 47 of them (42.0%) said
that they have reviewed the sample, i.e., read or
skimmed through the sample pages. Also, this
sub-sample mainly skimmed through the sample
pages (see Table 4).
Table 4: Sample text use with low average user rating.
Did not
Rea
d
Skimmed
Through
Read
First page 6.4% 66.0% 27.7%
Table of contents 14.9% 63.8% 21.3%
Introduction 21.3% 59.6% 19.2%
Cha
ter 1 25.5% 61.7% 12.8%
Reasons why respondents have not read the
introduction and first chapter were mainly the length
of the sample and lacking interest in the textbook
topic, whereas a lack of time and/or motivation was
the least frequently mentioned factor. Reasons why
the sample pages have not been read or skimmed
through were primarily a lack of interest in the
textbook’s topic, a lack of time and/or motivation,
and other reasons (availability of other intrinsic cues
that provided sufficient information for quality
assessment).
6 DISCUSSION
6.1 Major Findings
The study at hand investigates the role of intrinsic
cues (provided as product description on the front and
back cover and sample pages) and extrinsic cues
(average user rating) on the perceived quality of a
printed textbook sold online. The hypothesis tests
confirm the strong effect of the average user rating for
the perception of product quality (H1 being supported
by data). Where average user rating was high, the
textbook was considered having superior quality
compared with respondents who were shown a low
average user rating.
This result is in line with previous research that
has pointed at the relevance of online consumer
reviews for the assessment of product quality before
or after purchase (see King et al. (2014) for a review).
Studies drawing on signalling theory have shown that
extrinsic cues that can be easily observed and
assessed by consumers in e-commerce have the
highest impact on quality assessments (Wells et al.,
2011).
The availability of the sample text as well as the
interaction term of sample text availability and
average user rating did not show a significant effect
on consumers’ quality perceptions (H2 and H3 are
rejected). Hence, unlike anticipated, the sample text
neither had a direct nor a moderating impact on
perceived product quality. Hence, the availability of
the sample text did not override or minimize the effect
of a high/low average user rating on perceived
quality.
The absence of the interaction effect is countering
the findings provided by Choi et al. (2019) who
conducted a similar study in nonserial fiction and
romance e-books sold in an online store. Although
most respondents have made use of the sample (as
also revealed by Hu et al., 2010), the importance of
the intrinsic cues has diminished in presence of the
extrinsic cues (Zeithaml, 1988). In the current
findings, the most likely reason is a heightened
perceived effort or time consumption (Zeithaml,
1988), since intrinsic cues were provided and product
quality assessment was not difficult. Hence, the result
is interpreted against this background:
52.2% of the respondents who were provided with
the sample text neither read nor skimmed through the
materials due to lack of interest in the topic, lack of
time and/or motivation, or perceived sample length.
Hence, the majority of these participants used average
user rating to support their assessment of product
quality, resulting from the intrinsic cues to be not
appropriate to make a judgment about the textbook
quality.
Only 15.1% of the respondents who have
reviewed the sample pages at all, have read the
introduction and first chapter pages that were offered
in the sample. Most participants preferred to skim
through the text because of the text length, lacking
interest in the topic, and lack of time. Hence, also
these individuals ultimately used the extrinsic cue to
evaluate the product quality.
Hence, we can conclude that textbook samples
offered by online retailers can be perceived as too
complex for product quality assessment processes in
books for many consumers. On the other hand,
extrinsic cues, such as the average user rating, are
readily available and easy to interpret and therefore
become more salient to online consumers for quality
perception formation.
Is this a Good Book? The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cues for Perceived Product Quality in Textbooks in e-Commerce
203
6.2 Research Implications
The study contributes to the literature on product
quality perception in e-commerce in several ways.
First, it simultaneously investigates extrinsic and
intrinsic cues as well as their interaction as potential
drivers of product quality perception and thus
responds to the need for such an approach as
expressed by Hu et al. (2010). In an e-commerce
context, findings on this subject are limited. Second,
the study sheds light on motives of online consumers
to use intrinsic cues for product quality evaluation by
examining the extent and preferred parts of text
samples that are utilized by consumers. In doing so,
the study at hand complements extant findings
originating from analyses of secondary data available
from online retailers (Choi et al., 2018; Choi et al.,
2019; Hu et al., 2010), which helps to deepen the
understanding of how consumers use different kinds
of cues in product quality evaluation in greater detail.
Third, our study shows that the role of intrinsic cues
may be contingent upon the respective product
category. Unlike the study by Choi et al. (2019) which
revealed a strong effect of the interaction term of an
intrinsic and extrinsic cue in the categories of
nonserial fiction and romance e-books offered by an
online bookstore. Fourth, our study adds to research
on both intrinsic and extrinsic cues on perceived
product quality (Chen & Cheng, 2013; De Langhe et
al., 2014; Kim & Min, 2014; Wells at al., 2011) by
addressing the contemporaneous effect of the
intrinsic and extrinsic cue. By focusing on
informational goods where product quality is difficult
to assess prior to consumption, the findings provide
useful insights into the formation of product quality
assessment (Steenkamp, 1990).
6.3 Managerial Implications
The study offers implications for online consumers,
online retailers, and textbook authors. For consumers
the average user ratings matter for the assessment of
product quality in textbooks due to the easy access
and availability of average user ratings and the ease
to interpret them (Hu et al., 2017). However, such
ratings do not always reflect product quality in an
accurate manner since they are based on other users’
subjective assessments based on criteria that may be
different from those of an individual consumer. For
example, around two thirds of books that had been
launched on Amazon.com have shown positively
biased ratings shortly after their launch (Xinxin &
Hitt, 2008).
Online retailers that offer online reviews to their
customers may decide to complement subjective user
ratings with intrinsic cues that can provide a less
biased stimulus for product evaluation assessment.
While also extrinsic cues may be provided in a more
objective manner, e.g., by offering expert reviews that
are complementing user reviews (Zhou & Duan,
2016) or applying scoring systems with multiple
criteria on single attributes (e.g., content, writing style
etc.) rather than one overall assessment (Amblee &
Bui, 2011), intrinsic cues offer a different source of
information and hence a useful contribution to
formation of quality evaluation based on own
assessment criteria. As the findings show, such a
provision of intrinsic cues needs to be simple and easy
to use since consumers may otherwise quickly turn to
referring to simpler extrinsic cues.
This consideration leads to the recommendation
that retailers may undertake some effort to motivate
consumers to make use of intrinsic cues by an
appropriate design of sample pages and other stimuli.
This may particularly be relevant for products, in this
case textbooks, where the maximum number of
feasible extrinsic cues are rather rare, e.g., in cases
where the author or the subject is not very well known
and there are only few consumer reviews available.
Simply providing extensive sample texts appears not
to be sufficient as many respondents stressed that they
did not need all information provided for product
quality assessment.
Hence, for book authors, particularly unknown
authors, we recommend using unconventional and
innovative approaches of intrinsic cue provision to
overcome consumers’ hesitation to review them.
Possibilities are offering substantial parts of the text
or supplementary materials, for example case studies
or exercises, free of charge, if permitted in the
publishing contract. Authors and publishers may also
apply different formats of content provision, such as
visuals, audio or video content, or chat functions. This
way, intrinsic cues may be made more salient to
prospective buyers, especially among younger
generations.
7 CONCLUSION
The study results suggest that the provision of
intrinsic cues in online sold textbooks may require too
much time and effort from consumers to use them for
product quality evaluation. Hence, extrinsic cues such
as the average user ratings and simple intrinsic cues
such as visuals of the textbook’s front cover and back
cover description, become more salient to them, as
WEBIST 2023 - 19th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies
204
these cues are easily observable and can be
interpreted very quickly.
Like any research, this study has several
noteworthy limitations. First, the findings cannot be
generalized to other product categories, including
books of other genres, such as novels, drama, or
romance. They are not applicable to e-books either.
Second, results may be biased due to respondents’
usage scenario of personal use. Third, the intrinsic
and extrinsic cues have been manipulated only at two
levels (high/low and present/absent). Therefore,
potentially important levels such as an average user
rating close to three stars or different lengths or types
of samples were not used. Also, the number of
extrinsic and intrinsic cues was limited to one,
respectively, leading to a limited external validity, as
real online shops offer a multitude of cues. Hence,
future research may add further extrinsic cues, for
example the level of disagreement among reviewers,
text-based reviews and features of those (e.g., writing
style, sentiment), but also attributes like product
price, perceived author popularity or quality and
reputation of the online retailer. Further, the study at
hand has omitted personal contextual factors, such as
interest in the subject or overall need for the applied
textbook in general, which may also be a causal factor
of a higher or lower willingness to review especially
the more extensive intrinsic cues. Finally, the
experimental setting was different from a real
purchase situation, thus potentially leading to a biased
process of product quality evaluation. While this was
intentional to avoid a possible bias when introducing
purchase intention as a dependent variable, this factor
would contribute to a more complete understanding
of consumers’ product evaluation and their decision-
making process.
As a result, future research may apply different
experimental setups. Possible designs involve an
experimental website with a mock-up purchase
situation that involves a product purchase and a
payment process. Also, post-experimental surveys
may help better understand motivations of online
consumers when using particular intrinsic and
extrinsic quality cues to assess product quality.
Finally, also innovative digital formats of intrinsic
and extrinsic cue provision (e.g., by means of voice
communication and/or artificial intelligence
applications) may shed more light on the role of
intrinsic and extrinsic cues in the dynamically
changing e-commerce environment.
REFERENCES
Amblee, N., & Bui, T. (2011). Harnessing the influence of
social proof in online shopping: The effect of electronic
word of mouth on sales of digital microproducts.
International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2),
91-114.
Bhuian, S. N. (1997). Marketing cues and perceived
quality: Perceptions of Saudi consumers toward
products of the U.S., Japan, Germany, Italy, U.K. and
France. Journal of Quality Management, 2(2), 217–
234.
Boulding, W., & Kirmani, A. (1993). A consumer-side
experimental examination of signaling theory: Do
consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality?.
The Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 111-123.
Chen, S., & Cheng, F. F. (2013, May). The influence of
online atmosphere on perceived quality, satisfaction
and purchase intention. Paper presented at the 5th
International Conference on Service Science and
Innovation (ICSSI), Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Retrieved
from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6599368/
Chen, Z., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2003). A conceptual model of
perceived customer value in e-commerce: A
preliminary investigation. Psychology & Marketing,
20(4), 323-347. doi:10.1002/MAR.10076
Choi, A. A., Cho, D., Yim, D., Moon, J. Y., & Oh, W.
(2019). When seeing helps believing: the interactive
effects of previews and reviews on e-book purchases.
Information Systems Research, 30(4), 1164-1183.
doi:10.1287/LSRE.2019.0657
Choi, H. S., Ko, M. S., Medlin, D., & Chen, C. (2018). The
effect of intrinsic and extrinsic quality cues of digital
video games on sales: An empirical investigation.
Decision Support Systems, 10686-96. doi:10.1016/J
.DSS.2017.12.005
De Langhe, B., Fernbach, P. M., & Lichtenstein, D. R.
(2014). Navigating by the stars: What do online user
ratings reveal about product quality?. Advances in
Consumer Research, 42, 453.
Hu, N., Liu, L., Bose, I., & Shen, J. (2010). Does sampling
influence customers in online retailing of digital
music?. Information Systems & E-Business
Management, 8(4), 357-377. doi:10.1007/S10257-009
-0116-6
Hu, N., Pavlou, P. A., & Zhang, J. (2017). On self-selection
biases in online product reviews. MIS Quarterly, 41(2),
449-A17.
Kim, J.-H., & Min, D. (2014). The effects of brand
popularity as an advertising cue on perceived quality in
the context of internet shopping. Japanese
Psychological Research, 56(4), 309-319.
Kim, R. Y. (2021). When does online review matter to
consumers? The effect of product quality information
cues. Electronic Commerce Research, 21, 1011–1030.
doi:10.1007/S10660-020-09398-0
King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we
know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A
review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of
Is this a Good Book? The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cues for Perceived Product Quality in Textbooks in e-Commerce
205
Interactive Marketing (Mergent, Inc.), 28(3), 167-183.
doi:10.1016/J.INTMAR.2014.02.001
Koh, N. S., Hu, N., & Clemons, E. K. (2010). Do online
reviews reflect a product’s true perceived quality? An
investigation of online movie reviews across cultures.
Electronic Commerce Research & Applications, 9(5),
374-385. doi:10.1016/J.ELERAP.2010.04.001
Mitra, D., & Golder, P. N. (2006). How does objective
quality affect perceived quality? Short-term effects,
long-term effects, and asymmetries. Marketing Science,
25(3), 230–247.
Qualtrics. (2014, June 20). ESOMAR 28: 28 questions to
help research buyers of online samples. Retrieved from
https://communication.illinoisstate.edu/graduate/docu
ments/ESOMAR28.pdf
Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1990). Conceptual model of the
quality perception process. Journal of Business
Research, 21(4), 309–333.
Tuhovsky, I. (2015). Emotional intelligence: A practical
guide to making friends with your emotions and raising
your EQ. Available from https://www.amazon.com/
Emotional-Intelligence-Practical-Emotions-
Psychology/dp/1508645914/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?
_encoding=UTF8&qid=1520857752&sr=1-3-spons
Wang, C., & Zhang, X. (2009). Sampling of information
goods. Decision Support Systems, 48(1), 14-22.
doi:10.1016/J.DSS.2009.05.011
Weathers, D., Sharma, S., & Wood, S. L. (2007). Effects of
online communication practices on consumer
perceptions of performance uncertainty for search and
experience goods. Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 393-401.
doi:10.1016/J.JRETAI.2007.03.009
Wells, J. D., Valacich, J. S., & Hess, T. J. (2011). What
signal are you sending? How website quality influences
perceptions of product quality and purchase intentions.
MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 373-A18.
Xinxin, L., & Hitt, L. M. (2008). Self-selection and
information role of online product reviews. Information
Systems Research, 19(4), 456-474.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price,
quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of
evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.
Zhou, W., & Duan, W. (2016). Do professional reviews
affect online user choices through user reviews? An
empirical study. Journal of Management Information
Systems, 33(1), 202-228. doi:10.1080/07421222.2016
.1172460
Zhou, M., Liu, M., & Tang, D. (2013). Do the
characteristics of online consumer reviews bias buyers’
purchase intention and product perception? A
perspective of review quantity, review quality and
negative review sequence. International Journal of
Services Technology & Management, 19(4-6), 166-186.
doi:10.1504/IJSTM.2013.055632
WEBIST 2023 - 19th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies
206