Draupadi: Revisioning the Mythical Character in Chitra Banerjee
Divakaruni’s the Palace of Illusions
Soma Guha Das
1
and Shiony Das
2
1
St. Aloysius’ College(Autonomous), India
2
Madhyanchal Professional University, India
Keywords: Mythical Character, Re-Visioning, Retelling, Unconventional, Enigmatic Psyche.
Abstract: In mythology, Draupadi is a very significant woman who speaks her mind with an unbending will in the male-
dominated world. Her unconventional marriages and her active role in the fatal battle recognized her as
different from others. Women's writing is a medium of expression and an outlet for one's emotions and desires.
Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni’s The Palace of Illusions is a judicious retelling, reinterpreting of the
Mahabharata myth from a feminist perspective. She analyses the fact that since ancient times women have
been cornered and marginalized in society. The events of Mahabharata are narrated by Panchali, whose voice
acquires universal significance. It has surely achieved momentum in the present scenario. This paper is going
to explore the elaborate implanted in the characterization of Draupadi, the mythical character through the
words of the female mind of the author, in this novel. It further discusses the effrontery of Draupadi as the
expression of her intricate relationships with Karna, Krishna and her Palace are the incomprehensibility of
her enigmatic psyche.
1 INTRODUCTION
The binary concept of patriarchy and female
submissiveness is one of the most prominent themes
in Indian Epics. Rewriting and revisioning a mythical
character through the lens of modernity and
sensibility is a bold step into a new literary world. It
portrays a new and refreshed look to the character
which is unconventional to the audience and readers.
In mythology, Draupadi is a very significant woman
who speaks her mind with an unbending will in the
male-dominated world. Her unconventional
marriages and her active role in the fatal battle
recognized her as different from others. Women's
writing is a medium of expression and an outlet for
one's emotions and desires. Chitra Banerjee
Divakaruni’s The Palace of Illusions is a judicious
retelling, reinterpreting of the Mahabharata myth
from a feminist perspective. Divakaruni created many
women characters in mythology, she said, “I was left
unsatisfied by the portrayals of women characters in
…they remain shadowy figures, their thoughts and
motives mysterious (Divakaruni xiv-xv)1.
Divakaruni portrays Draupadi’s life as a series of
choices created by herself and not by the people
around her, giving her a voice in a male-dominated
society that prevailed in Ancient India. She analyses
the fact that since ancient times women have been
cornered and marginalized in society. The events of
Mahabharata are narrated by Panchali, whose voice
acquires universal significance. It has surely achieved
momentum in the present scenario. Far from being
docile and frail, we now see women as iconoclasts.
Draupadi’s life is not only troubled by her conjugal
concerns but also by the system of patriarchy. She
gathers the courage to face the challenges of
patriarchal notions which are an aspersion to her
womanhood and wins remarkable success when she
deconstructs patriarchy. This paper is going to
explore the elaborate implanted in the
characterization of Draupadi, the mythical character
through the words of the female mind of the author,
in this novel. It further discusses the effrontery of
Draupadi as the expression of her intricate
relationships with Karna, Krishna and her Palace are
the incomprehensibility of her enigmatic psyche.
2 DETAILED REVIEW
The Palace of Illusion is about women’s
discrimination, struggles, identity, male domination,
992
Guha Das, S. and Das, S.
Draupadi: Revisioning the Mythical Character in Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni’s the Palace of Illusions.
DOI: 10.5220/0012534100003792
Paper published under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
In Proceedings of the 1st Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies (PAMIR 2023), pages 992-995
ISBN: 978-989-758-687-3
Proceedings Copyright © 2024 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
female perspectives, and status of women during the
period of The Mahabharata. The humiliation that she
experienced was taken as the challenge of life.
Draupadi’s life indicated and taught in Vyas’s epic
how women need to accept the concept of tradition
and culture without any questions.
The views of Draupadi do not match with these
ordinary women and the result was as powerful as she
was. Many renderings of her life story especially
some particular episodes in it are created, recreated,
interpreted and constituted in the larger narrative
universe” (57). Divakaruni explains Draupadi’s
determination and courage throughout the novel.
Whether it was ancient or the modern period the life
of women has not had any changes, it has had only
challenges to face and perform according to the
context. It displays how a woman born as a princess
suffered in her life. Draupadi seeks to break the
shackles of the stereotypical concept of how women
can be women. Within the peripheries of patriarchal
society, Draupadi is exceptional and singular, as
Spivak called her odd, unpaired, and uncoupled.
In this novel, Draupadi brings out her strong
trajectory since childhood as her first impact was on
education which was not provided to her whereas her
brother was given this priority. Her tutor told her
brother to inform her that A Kshatriya woman’s
highest purpose in life is to support the warrior in her
life”(Divakaruni 26). Her father and teacher
neglected her education. When she questioned her
brother “Who decided that woman’s highest purpose
was to support men?” (Devakaruni 26). The brother
replied that is what I’d like you to do. The author
wanted to show that the old practice of every woman
of those periods whether she was a queen or a normal
woman, nobody cared about the education of women
and they were bound to do what men wanted them to
do. Their duty was to take care of their husbands and
to pray that they with glory on the battlefield.
Marriage is a custom that is taken as their decision to
abide by the social regime and family acceptance.
Swayamwara means the practice of searching for
their own groom. Draupadi was subjected to
Swayamwara, but she was pledged for Arjuna by her
family and Krishna. To value her father’s words, she
was forced to surrender herself to whatever her father
pointed out. Devakaruni gives this message to society
that in this male-dominated society, a daughter is a
puppet of her own family, a less prioritized creature
to the men, the rulers of their house. Women were
treated as slaves by men to obey their orders without
any question. In The Palace of Illusions, Draupadi
was burning with inner anguish. Draupadi failed to
express her views when Kunti asked her to marry all
five sons. She was waiting for Arjun to stand up for
her against marrying all the five as they were
promised to each other but nobody objected to the
words of Kunti. As a result, she became a victim of a
social evil polyandry.
In this novel, Draupadi not only exists as a passive
being but also rises up to become a symbol of the
contemporary woman figure. She raises her voice in
Duryodhana’s court where she was gambled away by
her husband. Ashamed Draupadi questioned the
elders in the court that once a person was sold as a
slave, they had no right to wager others, but she was
mistaken to discover that the laws of men would not
save her. The scene portrayed by the author proves
that the law which was equal to all would not be the
same for women. This attracts the attention of readers
and the audience that the representation seems to
perpetuate a stereotype. Significantly Draupadi as a
character has served as a creative impetus for many
writers and painters. Everyone has expressed either
an emotional point of view or an ideological position.
Subramanya Bharathi, the Tamil poet wrote in
Panchali Sabadam the disrobing of Draupadi as the
tribulation of Mother India, whose body has been
“invaded” and “Stripped” of dignity. Bharathi made
the nation awake to retaliate using Draupadi as a
source of inspiration. He adds that she believed in her
inner strength and strong convictions. Unlike these
narratives, Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni ‘s The Palace
of Illusions, a reading of the epic story through the
gendered eyes of Draupadi offers a new perspective.
Draupadi wants to draw her own destiny though
within the confines of epic narrative. This action of
creativity responding to a former version of a story is
deemed Re-visioning. Draupadi remains as a strong
persona and shows that she never feels lower herself
to them by begging for her dignity and respect. She
re-invents herself as a powerful woman who is not
dependent on her husband in her hour of need. She
never received any answer to any of her questions in
court. Her anger and revenge for this unfortunate,
shameful act against her were the reason for the war
which was finished with the death of Kauravas.
The author’s Draupadi deconstructs the former
narratives in order to establish her ‘self’, a self that is
complex and multi-layered. Her version of self
becomes a source of empowerment which finally
leads to her emancipation. The process of
empowerment starts with the validation of the
material itself. Here, Draupadi initially challenges the
male dictum and celebrates her feminity. Her life was
filled with dual struggle, an attempt to harmonize
different, controversial roles into one stable identity
on the one hand, and her constant fight to seek
Draupadi: Revisioning the Mythical Character in Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni’s the Palace of Illusions
993
attention from others. She struggled to balance her
different roles according to the circumstances, which
made her audacious but her complex and
contradictory attitude made her unique. She attracts a
special presence to the men in her life. She impressed
and was influenced by these men, especially the
unattainable lover of her dreams Karna, her enigmatic
friend Krishna, and her heroic husbands. Her intimate
bonding with her twin brother Dhri saves her from the
deep despondency of a neglected childhood. His
patience with her audacity, self-control, and calmness
at her indignation and his support for her quest for
learning strengthen their relationship.
In Vyas’s Narration of the epic, the Krishna-
Draupadi bond is sunk in divinity and devotion. But
Divakaruni’s Draupadi saw Krishna not as a savior
but, as a friend and one who really fathoms the
intricacy of her complex mind. His appearance
reduced her abhorrence for the lonely life in her
father’s palace. Even she wonders if they share a
similarity as they are both dark-skinned. Draupadi felt
how much Krishna was to her during yagna, “When I
thought you had died, I wanted to die too”(166) In her
final journey she again realized that all men in her life
valued their virtue more than hers. There was only
one love that existed in the world -her love for
Krishna. He made her confused and gave her
salvation.
Draupadi’s marital life teaches her that a female
does not have a choice of freedom from a polygamous
wedding. It was a curse for her. Arjun won a difficult
test, so she chose him as her husband, and that’s why
Arjun married her. But later she was insulted by
Arjun who remained silent when Kunti asked his
brothers to share her. Yudhishtira further degraded
her by carrying out their mother’s wish by treating her
as if she was an object won in a context. Her marriage
needed extreme self-control, patience, and a great
deal of adjustment. She had to tolerate the wifely
responsibilities of five great heroes with equanimous
temper. “Dreaded or desired or even demanded by the
male, virginity is the highest form of the feminine
mystery” (Beauvoir 206). The virginity boon
bestowed on Draupadi conserves her nobility both in
the epic and in the novel. But she realized that her
polyandry was an injustice to her self-esteem.In
return, she wished to have a gift of forgetting as she
felt the virginity boon benefitted her husbands than
her. If the sage had cared to inquire, Id have
requested the gift of forgetting (120). The protagonist
broke the stereotypes of womanhood through her
admiration for Karna, the arch-enemy of her
husbands. She appreciated Karna, the quintessential
tragic hero who had suffered rejection all through his
life. Her secret love for Karna was no longer
illegitimate. The undefined attraction to Karna was
caused in her mind long back when she met him. But
she was forced to insult Karna and reject her
Swayamwara only to save her brother’s life. He
gradually became an unfulfilled desire in her as a
mode of retaliation against her polygamous wedding.
Her revulsion of being a ‘communal cup’(120) in the
hands of men triggered her yearning to be the wife of
a single man. Karna was more of her dream as well as
an imagination. She saw him as an outlet to placate
her stormy mind. “As insidious voice inside me said,
Karna would never have let you suffer like this” (99).
Draupadi’s unintentional hurts and mistaken response
to her humiliation bring him closer to her. Karna
loves her though he gets angry at her insults. “I told
myself I hated her [] but I was only fooling myself
(276).
Rational reading of Draupadi and her relationship
with men consults her revolutionary psychological
interpretations. Divakaruni’s Draupadi’s search for
her own self was the fundamental search for
womanhood, born and brought up in a hegemonic
patriarchy. Bandhopadhya observes, “In a story of
power, politics, and carnage the true portrayal of
characters shorn of their divinity and virtuous status
gives them a façade of ordinariness. Hence viewing
Draupadi as an ordinary woman with extraordinary
willpower elevates her to unparallel personifying
womanhood. Simultaneously she became a site for
affirming and challenging the ideologies of patriarchy
as she was a victim of it and a person who wished to
free herself from it. [] I was surprised at how
angry it made me feel and how helpless”(120).
In The Palace of Illusions, the episode of
Draupadi’s disrobing is a fine instance of
objectification of womanhood and her quick response
to it. When she was compelled to expose her body to
the men around her, she became a mere object.
Actually, she was hurt because of the indifference of
her husband and the lusty eyes of the men around her.
“Let them stare at my nakedness. Why should I care?
They and I should be ashamed for shattering the
bounds of decency”(193). She questions the legality
of the transaction when she was pledged like a chattel
in the game of dice. Nobody replied to her question if
Yudhishthira actually still had the right to lose her
after he had already lost himself. So she decided to
give up her traditional feminity to restore her
challenged dignity, “I will not comb it until then I
bathe it in Kaurava blood” (194). Thus, she became
both a victim of patriarchy and a threat to patriarchy.
She is at once a “palimpsest and a contradiction”
(Spivak 388). Draupadi’s high temperament was
PAMIR 2023 - The First Pamir Transboundary Conference for Sustainable Societies- | PAMIR
994
triggered by her urge for self-esteem. The patriarchal
conservative beliefs shackle her attempts at self-
realization. But she was uninterested in being
inculcated with the stereotypes of feminity. Hence
Draupadi’s revitalized feminism is observed. Her
experiences of refusal and rejection also accelerate
her audacity. Family and home are the places where
the identities of womanhood are constructed,
deconstructed, and reconstructed regularly. Since
childhood, Draupadi has dreams of possessing her
own palace. She was seeking a space to hold her
identity with rootedness and control over her life. Her
search for ‘the’ palace is indeed her search for herself.
“[ …] my palace would be like no other”(113). For
Draupadi, constructing her identity happens through
the exploration of the possibilities of her palace. It
was not only an architectural construction but an
embodiment of her empowerment. There she
achieved the much-deserved space and glory. She
believed that her identity was not constituted to fulfill
the expectations of others. She appeared visibly
liberated when she became the mistress of her palace.
This showed her sense of emancipation. It helped her
to forgive the treacherous behavior of Arjuna(his
other marriages). This encouraged and strengthened
her to win over her mother-in-law. “[…] and the
palace of illusion was my domain, and she accepted
this” (150).
Taking over her palace by Duryodhana was like a
cause of shattering of her ‘self’. The palace also is a
stimulant in connecting the imaginative inner space
and domestic outer space of Draupadi. Her struggle to
build a magical palace and her capacity to
comprehend the potency of the female self -lead her
to a self-sufficient and self-engaged individual.
Therefore, her palace became a transformational
space a place of performance and a site of
resistance.
A Revisionist literary text seeks to reconstruct the
traditional characters which have been marginalized
in the original text. It encourages the readers an
irreplaceable experience of reading the revisionist
literary text as the vision and concept are altered.
3 CONCLUSION
Divakaruni’s best-seller novel of the year in India The
Palace of Illusions is a re-telling of the Indian epic,
The Mahabharata from Draupadi’s perspective. It is
about the clear path sought by the inspiring feminist
voice and self-centered voice of Draupadi from
Vyasa’s The Mahabharata. Divakarini’s Draupadi
did not wait for any males to protect her from misery.
They help themselves by recognizing and solving
problems. They re-write the fate of womanhood by
resetting themselves against traditional agreements.
This revisionist literary text brings out contemporary
issues like identity crisis, marginalization, and gender
discrimination of women in the male-dominated
society. It is expressed through a mythological
character, Draupadi who did not have any voice,
choice, or identity in the original text but
Divakaruni’s Draupadi had the courage and strength
to question existing restrictive laws and to show the
world that every woman has an identity of her own.
By giving a voice and space to the suppressed, it
opened new imaginations and possibilities in the
literary world. In a review Tariqa Tandon Said,
“Divakaruni’s interpretation provides a humanistic
touch to the epic, making it more realistic, more
relatable and more personal which gives a new
insight into the epic.
REFERENCES
Chitra Baneerjee Divakaruni.(2008) The Palace of
Illusions. Picador.
Bandyopadhyay, (2016). Indrajit Rape of Draupadi. Lulu
Press.Inc.
Beauvoir, Simone De. (2011)The Second Sex.Vintage.
Devi, Mahaswetha, (1977) .Brest Stories.Translated by
Gayatri Chakravorthy Spivak Seagull Press.
Chakravorthy Gayatri Spivak (1981) .Draupadi by
Mahaswetha Devi Critical Inquiry vol 8(2) .P-381-402
Syam, Amreeta ,(1991) Kurukshetra,Writers Workshop
Tandon Tariqa .(2023) . The Palace of Illusions: A Book
Review,Alternatives International Journals, 2 Feb.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/2393861714
551264
Draupadi: Revisioning the Mythical Character in Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni’s the Palace of Illusions
995