A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING DIFFICULTIES IN ERP IMPLEMENTATION

Luis I. Ferrario, Jorge M. Montagna

Abstract

Various sources point out very high percentages of failures to implement ERP systems. In this work, the main difficulties for this task are analyzed and a systematic classification of fundamental reasons is intended. By considering the reasons that lead to failure, a simple and effective mechanism is generated to evaluate in advance complications the project might present. In this way, the tools to be used can be adjusted to the specific characteristics of the project. Somehow, it is intended to solve the problem presented by general methodologies, which are used for any kind of enterprise, without previously considering its conditions and state to face this type of projects.

References

  1. Al-Mashari M. and M. Zairi, 2000, The effective application of SAP R/3: A proposed model of best practice, Logistics Informat. Manag. 13, p. 156-166.
  2. Abdinnour-Helm S. et al., 2003, Pre-implementation attitudes and organizational readiness for implementing an enterprise resource planning system, European Journal of Operational Research 146, p. 258-273.
  3. Bajaj A. and S. Nidumolu, 1998, A feedback model to understand information system usage, Information & Management 33, p. 213-224.
  4. Bancroft N., H. Seip and A. Sprengel, 1997, Implementing SAP R/3; Manning Publications Co.
  5. Boyer K. et al., 2002, E-services: Operating strategy-A case study and a method for analyzing operational benefits, Journal of Operat. Managem. 20, p. 175-188.
  6. Davenport T., 1998, Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System, Harvard Bus. Rev. 16 (4), 121-131.
  7. Gefen D., 2002, Nurturing client's to encourage engagement success during the customization of the ERP system, Omega 30, p. 287-299.
  8. Gelderman M., 1998, The relation between user satisfaction, usage of information systems and performance, Informat. & Management 34, p. 11-18.
  9. Gottschalk P., 1999, Implementation predictors of strategic information systems plans, Information & Management 36, p. 77-91.
  10. Heeks R., 2003, Most eGovernment-for-development projects fail: how can risks be reduced?, iGovernment Working Paper Series.
  11. Hong K. and Y. Kim, 2002, The critical success factor for ERP implementation: An organizational fit perspective, Information & Management 40, p. 25-40.
  12. Jianga J. and G. Kleinb, 1999, Risks to different aspects of system success, Informat. & Manag. 36, p. 263-272.
  13. Krumbholz M. and Maiden N., 2001, The implementation of enterprise resource planning packages in different organisational and national cultures, Information Systems 26, p. 185-204.
  14. Kuruppuarachichi P. et al., 2002, IT project implementation strategies for effective changes: A critical review, Logistics Information Management 15, p. 126-137.
  15. Lozinsky S., 1998, Enterprise-wide software solutions. Integration strategies and practices; Addison-Wesley.
  16. Mabert V. et al., 2003a, Enterprise resource planning: managing implementation process, European Journal of Operational Research 146, 302-314.
  17. Mabert V. et al., 2003b, The impact of organization size on ERP implementation in US manufacturing, Omega 31, p. 235-246.
  18. Mandal P. and A. Gunasekaran, 2003, Issues in implementing ERP: A case study, European Journal of Operational Research 146, p. 274-283.
  19. Rebstock M. and K. Hildebrand, 1999, SAP R/3 Management; Coriolis Technology Press.
  20. Sarker S., and A. Lee, 2003, Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation, Information & Management 40, p. 813-829.
  21. Soffer P. et al., 2003, ERP modeling: A comprehensive approach, Information Systems 28, p. 673-690.
  22. Somers T. and K. Nelson, 2003, The impact of the strategy and integration mechanisms on enterprise system value: empirical evidence from manufacturing firms, Europ. Journal of Operat. Research 146, p. 315-338.
  23. Stensrud E., 2001, Alternative approaches to effort prediction of ERP projects, Information and Software Technology 43, p. 413-423.
  24. Westerveld E., 2003, The project excellence model: linking success criteria and critical success factors, Intern. Journal of Project Management 21, p. 411-418.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

I. Ferrario L. and M. Montagna J. (2004). A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING DIFFICULTIES IN ERP IMPLEMENTATION . In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS, ISBN 972-8865-00-7, pages 460-465. DOI: 10.5220/0002612504600465


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis04,
author={Luis I. Ferrario and Jorge M. Montagna},
title={A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING DIFFICULTIES IN ERP IMPLEMENTATION},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,},
year={2004},
pages={460-465},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002612504600465},
isbn={972-8865-00-7},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,
TI - A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING DIFFICULTIES IN ERP IMPLEMENTATION
SN - 972-8865-00-7
AU - I. Ferrario L.
AU - M. Montagna J.
PY - 2004
SP - 460
EP - 465
DO - 10.5220/0002612504600465