INTEGRATION, FLEXIBILITY AND TRANSVERSALITY: ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ERP SYSTEMS

Sylvestre Uwizeyemungu, Louis Raymond

Abstract

The interest of firms in ERP systems has been echoed in both the scientific and professional literature. It is worth noting however that while this literature has become increasingly abundant, there does not yet exist an operational definition of the ERP concept that is, if not unanimously, at least widely accepted. This constitutes a handicap for both the research and practice communities. The present study outlines what could be considered as an ERP by first determining the essentially required characteristics of such a system : integration, flexibility and transversality. Indicators are then provided in order to operationalise these three characteristics. The study concludes by proposing a research framework on the impact of an ERP’s key characteristics upon the performance of the system in a given organisational setting.

References

  1. AMR Research, 1998. AMR Research predicts ERP market will reach $52 billion by 2002. Enterprise Resource Planning Software Report, 1997-2002. http://www.amrresearch.com/Content/viewpress.asp?i d=13376&docid=848
  2. APQC's International Benchmarking Clearinghouse, in partnership with Arthur Andersen & Co., SC, 1996. Process classification framework. APQC, American Productivity & Quality Center. http://www.apqc.org
  3. Barki, H. and Pinsonneault, A., 2002. Explaining ERP implementation effort and benefits with organizational integration. Cahiers du GreSI, n° 02-01, 27 pages.
  4. Barki, H. and Pinsonneault, A., 2003. The construct of organizational integration: A research framework and its application to enterprise systems research. Cahier du GreSI, n° 03-04, 31 pages.
  5. Bentley, T., 1995. Systems - A process orientation. Management Accounting, January, p. 36.
  6. Beretta, S., 2002. Unleashing the integration potential of ERP systems. The role of process-based performance measurement systems. Business Process Management Journal, 8(3), 254-277.
  7. Besson, P., 1999. Les ERP à l'épreuve de l'organisation. Systèmes d'Information et Management, 4(4), 21-51.
  8. Brandyberry, A., Rai, A. and White, G.P., 1999. Intermediate performance impacts of advanced manufacturing technology systems: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences, 30(4), 993-1020.
  9. Brown, J. P., 2001. Is ERP a Silver Bullet? APICS - The Performance Advantage, 10(13). http://www.apics.org/magazine.
  10. Byrd, T.A. and Turner, D.E., 2000. Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure : Exploratory analysis of a construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(1), 167-208.
  11. Carbonel, M., 2001. Dérives organisationnelles dans les projets ERP : les cas de Guerbet et Gaumont. Systèmes d'Information et Management, 6(1), 71-85.
  12. Davenport, T.H., 1998. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review, 76(4), 121-131.
  13. D'Souza, D.E. and Williams, F.P., 2000. Toward a taxonomy of manufacturing flexibility dimensions. Journal of Operations Management, 18, 577-593.
  14. Deloitte Consulting, 1999. ERP's second wave: Maximazing the value of ERP-enabled processes. Deloitte Consulting, Atlanta.
  15. Duncan, N.B., 1995. Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure : A study of resource characteristics and their measure. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(2), 37-57.
  16. Esteves, J. and Pastor, J.A., 2001. Enterprise Resource Planning systems research: An annotated bibliography. Communication of AIS, 7(8).
  17. Everdingen, Y.V., Hillegersberg, J.V. et Waarts, E., 2000. ERP Adoption by european midsize companies. Communication of the ACM, 43(4), 27-31.
  18. Forest, G., 1999. Généalogie des ERP et gestion des flux physiques. Systèmes d'Information et Management, 4(4), 71-89.
  19. Forsberg, T., Nilsson, L., and Antoni, M., 1999. Process orientation : The swedish experience. Total Quality Management, 10(4&5), 540-547.
  20. Golden, W. and Powell, P., 2000. Towards a definition of flexibility: In search of the holy grail? Omega, The International Journal of Management Science, 28, 373-384.
  21. Greenemeier, L., 2001. ERP : It's not just for big companies. InformationWeek, October 29.
  22. Harrington, H.J., 1997. The fallacy of universal best practices. The TQM Magazine, 9(1), 61-75.
  23. Hasselbring, W., 2000. Information system integration. Communications of the ACM, 43(6), 32-38.
  24. Hitt, L.M., D.J. Wu and Zhou, X., 2002. ERP investment : Business impact and productivity measures. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 71-98.
  25. Jesitus, J., 1997. Broken Promises? FoxMeyer's project was a disaster. Was the company too aggressive or was it misled? Industry Week, November 3, pp. 31-37.
  26. Klaus, H., Rosemann, M. and Gable. G.G., 2000. What is ERP? Information Systems Frontiers, 2(2), 141-162.
  27. Lequeux, J.L., 1999. Manager avec les ERP. Progiciels de gestion intégrés et Internet. Éditions d'Organisation, Paris.
  28. Markus, M.L., 2000. Paradigm shifts - E-business and business/systems integration. Communications of the AIS, 4(article10).
  29. Markus, M.L., 2001. Reflections on the systems integration enterprise. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3), 171-180.
  30. Markus, M.L. and Tanis, C., 2000. The enterprise system experience - From adoption to success. In Zmud, R.W. (Editor) (2000). Framing the domains of IT management. Projecting the future… through the past. Pinnaflex Education Resources, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio.
  31. McCormack, K. and Johnson, B., 2001. Business process orientation, supply chain management, and the ecorporation. IIE Solutions 35(10) , 33-37.
  32. Österle, H., Fleisch, E. and Alt, R. (2001). Business networking. Shaping collaboration between enterprises. Éd. Springer, Heidelberg. Second, revised and extended edition.
  33. Parr, A.N. and Shanks, G., 2000. A Taxonomy of ERP implementation approaches. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
  34. Prosser, A. and Ossimitz, M.L., 2000. Data Warehouse Management. Department of Production Management, University of Economics and Business Administration, Vienna, Austria. http://www.indi.wuwien.ac.at/download/data_warehouse.pdf
  35. Rosemann, M. and Wiese, J., 1999. Measuring the performance of ERP software : a balanced scorecard approach. Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Wellington, 1-3 december.
  36. Rowe, F., 1999. Cohérence, intégration informationnelle et changement : esquisse d'un programme de recherche à partir des Progiciels Intégrés de Gestion. Systèmes d'Information et Management, 4(4), 3-20.
  37. Scott, J.D., 1999. The FoxMeyer Drugs' bankruptcy : Was it a failure of ERP? Proceedings of The Association For Information Systems, Fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems.
  38. Smyth, R.W., 2001. Challenges to successful ERP use (research in progress). Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Information Systems, Bled, Slovenia, June 27-29, 1227-1231.
  39. Soh, C., Kien, S.S. and Tay-Yap, J., 2000. Cultural Fits and Misfits :Is ERP A Universal Solution? Communications of the ACM, 43(4), 47-51.
  40. Toussaint, P.J., Bakker, A.R. and Groenewegen, L.P.J., 2001. Integration of information systems: Assessing its quality. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedecine, 64, 9-35.
  41. Truex, D., 2001. ERP Systems as facilitating and confounding factors in corporate mergers : The case of two canadian telecommunications companies. Systèmes d'Information et Management, 6(1), 7-21.
  42. Tuteja, A., 1998. Enterprise Ressource Planning : What's there in it? http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/Library/6045/e rp.html
  43. Willis, T. H., Willis-Brown, A.H. and McMillan, A., 2001. Cost containment strategies for ERP system implementations. Production and Inventory Management Journal, 42(2), 36-42.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Uwizeyemungu S. and Raymond L. (2004). INTEGRATION, FLEXIBILITY AND TRANSVERSALITY: ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ERP SYSTEMS . In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS, ISBN 972-8865-00-7, pages 70-77. DOI: 10.5220/0002622800700077


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis04,
author={Sylvestre Uwizeyemungu and Louis Raymond},
title={INTEGRATION, FLEXIBILITY AND TRANSVERSALITY: ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ERP SYSTEMS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,},
year={2004},
pages={70-77},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002622800700077},
isbn={972-8865-00-7},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,
TI - INTEGRATION, FLEXIBILITY AND TRANSVERSALITY: ESSENTIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ERP SYSTEMS
SN - 972-8865-00-7
AU - Uwizeyemungu S.
AU - Raymond L.
PY - 2004
SP - 70
EP - 77
DO - 10.5220/0002622800700077