THE SCOPE AND INTENSITY OF DERIVED BENEFITS FROM E-COMMERCE PENETRATION IN SMES

Louis-A. Lefebvre, Elie Elia, Élisabeth Lefebvre, Onno Omta

Abstract

This paper attempts to (i) to assess the relative importance of benefits related to the gradual unfolding of business-to-business e-commerce (B-2-B e-commerce) penetration among manufacturing SMEs and (ii) to demonstrate that the scope and intensity of these benefits increase in the later stages of e-commerce penetration as organizational learning gradually takes place. Empirical evidence strongly suggests that these benefits are cumulative and that organizational learning allows SMEs to reap these benefits.

References

  1. Amit, R. and Zott, C., 2001. Value creation in ebusiness. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 6/7, pp.493-520.
  2. Barua, A., Kriebel, C.H. and Mukhopadhyay, T., 1995. Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation. Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 3-21.
  3. Barua, A., Konana, P., Whinston, A.B. and Yin, F., 2001. Driving E-Business Excellence. MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 36-44.
  4. Bertschek, I. and Fryges, H., 2002. The Adoption of Business-to-Business E-Commerce: Empirical Evidence for German Companies. Paper 02-05, Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim.
  5. Couper, M.P., 2000. Usability Evaluation of ComputerAssisted Survey Instruments. Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 384-396.
  6. Daniel, E., Wilson, H. and Myers, A., 2002. Adoption of E-Commerce by SMEs in the UK, Towards a Stage Model. International Small Business Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 253-270.
  7. Dillman, D.A., 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design. New York: John Wiley.
  8. Dutta, S. and Evrard, P., 1999. Information Technology and Organization within European Small Enterprises. European Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 239-251.
  9. Elia, E., Lefebvre, L.A. and Lefebvre, É., 2004. Typology of B-to-B E-comerce Initiatives and Related Benefits in Manufacturing SMEs. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Hawaii: IEEE. Forthcoming.
  10. eEurope, 2002. An Information Society for All, Action Plan 2002 and 2005. http://www.europa.eu.int/informationsociety/eeurope /actionplan.
  11. Gebauer, J., and Shaw, M.J., 2002. Introduction to the Special Section: Business-to-Business Electronic Commerce”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 7-17.
  12. Grandon, E. E. and Pearson J.M., 2003. Perceived Strategic Value and Adoption of Electronic Commerce: An Empirical Study of Small and Medium Sized Businesses. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Honolulu: IEEE.
  13. Hocque, F., 2000. E-enterprise: Business Models, Architecture and Components. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  14. Industry Canada, 2002. Key Indicators on ICT Infrastructure, Use and Content. Report, Ottawa.
  15. Kauffman, R. J., and Weill, P., 1989. An Evaluative Framework for Research on the Performance Effects of Information Technology Investment. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems, Boston.
  16. Kendall, J., Tung, L.L., Chera, K.H., Ng, C.H. and Tan, S.M., 2001. Electronic Commerce adoption by SMEs in Singapore. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Honolulu: IEEE.
  17. Lefebvre, É., and Lefebvre, L.A., 2003. E-commerce Adoption Trajectories Among Manufacturing SMEs, Proceedings of IADIS Conference,Portugal.
  18. Magal, S.R., Feng, M. and Essex, P.A., 2001. An Exploratory Study of Web-Based Electronic Commerce Applications. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, Vol. 3, No. 5, pp. 139-149.
  19. McAfee, A., 2002. The Impact of Enterprise Information Technology Adoption on Operational Performance: An Empirical Investigation. Production and Operations Management, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 33-53.
  20. Mirchandani, A. and Motwani, J., 2001. Understanding Small Business Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Computer Information Systems, Spring 2001, pp. 70-73.
  21. Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  22. OECD, 1998. SMEs and Electronic Commerce. Paris: Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
  23. OECD, 2002. Measuring the Information Economy. Paris: OECD Publications.
  24. Riquelme H., 2002. Commercial Internet Adoption in China: Comparing the Experience of Small, Medium and Large Businesses. Internet Research, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 276-286.
  25. Rogelberg, S.G., Fisher, G.G., Maynard, D.C., Hakel M.D. and Horvath, M., 2001. Attitudes Toward Surveys: Development of a Measure and its Relationship to Respondent Behavior. Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 3-25.
  26. Statistics Canada, 2001. Electronic Commerce and Technology Use. Ottawa: Connectedness Series.
  27. Stevenson, L. and Lundström, A., 2001. Patterns and trends in entrepreneurship/SME policy and practice in ten economies. Swedish Foundation for Small Business Research, Stockholm.
  28. Subramaniam, C., and Shaw, M.J., 2002. A Study of the Value and Impact of B2B E-Commerce: The Case of Web-Based Procurement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 19-40.
  29. Tallon, P. P., Kraemer, L. K. and Gurbaxani, V., 2000. Journal of Management Information Systems. Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 145-173.
  30. Turban, E., David King, J.L., Warkentin, J.L. and H.M., M., 2002. Chung, Electronic Commerce 2002: A Managerial Perspective, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
  31. Turner, C., 2000. The Information E-conomy, Kogan Page, London.
  32. US Department of Commerce, 2002a. Main Street in the Digital Age: How Small and Medium-Sized Businesses Are Using the Tools of the New Economy. Washington DC: Economics and Statistics Administration.
  33. US Department of Commerce, 2002b. E-Stats 2000. Washington DC: US Census Bureau.
  34. Van Beveren, J. and Thomson, H., 2002. The Use of Electronic Commerce by SMEs in Victoria, Australia. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 250-253.
  35. Varian, H., Litan, R.E., Elder A. and Shutter, J., 2002. The Net Impact Study. Available at: www.netimpactstudy.com.
  36. Zhu, K. and Kraemer, K.L., 2002. E-Commerce Metrics for Net-Enhanced Organizations: Assessing the Value of E-Commerce to Firm Performance in the Manufacturing Sector. Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 275-295.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Lefebvre L., Elia E., Lefebvre É. and Omta O. (2004). THE SCOPE AND INTENSITY OF DERIVED BENEFITS FROM E-COMMERCE PENETRATION IN SMES . In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 4: ICEIS, ISBN 972-8865-00-7, pages 55-61. DOI: 10.5220/0002637000550061


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis04,
author={Louis-A. Lefebvre and Elie Elia and Élisabeth Lefebvre and Onno Omta},
title={THE SCOPE AND INTENSITY OF DERIVED BENEFITS FROM E-COMMERCE PENETRATION IN SMES},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 4: ICEIS,},
year={2004},
pages={55-61},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002637000550061},
isbn={972-8865-00-7},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 4: ICEIS,
TI - THE SCOPE AND INTENSITY OF DERIVED BENEFITS FROM E-COMMERCE PENETRATION IN SMES
SN - 972-8865-00-7
AU - Lefebvre L.
AU - Elia E.
AU - Lefebvre É.
AU - Omta O.
PY - 2004
SP - 55
EP - 61
DO - 10.5220/0002637000550061