OPEN ISSUES ON INFORMATION SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DOMAIN: THE VISION

André Vasconcelos, Carla Marques Pereira, Pedro Sousa, José Tribolet

Abstract

Currently organizations, pushed by several business and technological changes, are more concern about Information systems (IS) than ever. Though organizations usually still face each IS as a separately technological issue with slight relations with business domain. This paper discusses the importance of the Information System Architecture (ISA) as the tool for ensuring a global view on IS and for explicitly assessing alignment between technology and business processes and strategies. In this paper, considering the numerous topics, technologies and buzzwords surrounding ISA domain, we identify the major ISA open issues, namely: ISA Modelling, ISA Methodology, ISA Evaluation, IS Architectural Styles and Patterns, and IS/Business Alignment. We also present our advances in addressing some of these issues, by proposing an approach for ISA evaluation and IS/Business Alignment measure. This approach is supported on an ISA modelling framework and provides several indicators and measures for ISA evaluation. This approach is applied to an IS health care project evaluation.

References

  1. CIM, 2nd Revised and Extended Edition, SpringerVerlag.
  2. Boar, Bernard, 1999, Constructing Blueprints for Enterprise IT Architecture, John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Computer Sciences Corporation, 2001. Critical Issues of Information Systems Management, http://www.csc.com/aboutus/uploads/CI_Report.pdf
  4. Davenport, T.H. and Beers, M.C. 1995. Managing Information About Processes, Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), pp. 57-80.
  5. DeBoever, L., 1997. Enterprise Architecture Boot Camp & Best Practices: A Workshop, Meta Group.
  6. Dod, 2002. Department of Defense Joint Technical Architecture.
  7. Eriksson, Hans-Erik and Penker, Magnus. 2000. Business Modeling with UML: Business Patterns at Work, OMG Press, Wiley Computer Publishing
  8. FEAF, 1999. Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework, version 1.1.
  9. FEAPMO, 2002. The Business Reference Model - A Foundation for Government-wide Improvement. http://feapmo.gov/
  10. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson R., and Vlissides, J., 1995. Design Patterns-Elements of reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley, New Jersey, ISBN 0-201- 63361-2.
  11. Garlan, D. et al., Architectural Mismatch (Why It's Hard to Build Systems Out of Existing Parts), Proceedings 17th International Conference on Software Engineering, Seatle, WA, April 23-30 1995, pp.170-185
  12. Giaglis, G.M., Mylonopoulos, N.A. and Doukidis, G.I. (1999) The ISSUE Methodology for Quantifying Benefits from Information Systems, Logistics Information Management, 12, 1-2, pp. 50-62.
  13. Hein, K., 1985. Information System Model and Architecture Generator, Volume 24, Numbers 3/4, pp. 213.
  14. IEEE Architecture Working Group, 1998. Recommended Practice for Architecture Description - Draft IEEE standard P1471/D4.1, IEEE.
  15. Inmon, W. H., Zachman, John A. and Geiger, Jonathan G. 1997. Data Stores, Data Warehousing, and the Zachman Framework, McGraw-Hill
  16. International Telecommunication Union, Telecommunication Standardization Sector, 1995. Recommendation X.904: Information Technology - Open Distributed Processing - Reference Model: Architectural Semantics.
  17. Jacobson, M., Silverstein, M., Winslow, B., 2002. Patterns of Home: The Ten Essentials of Enduring Design, Taunton Press.
  18. Liles, D. H., Johnson, M. E., and Meade, L., 2003 (access date), The Enterprise Engineering Discipline, http://arri.uta.edu/eif/ent_eng.htm.
  19. Lory, et. al., 2003 (access date). Microsoft Solutions Framework Version 3.0 Overview, http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp
  20. Miller, S., 1998. Asap Implementation at the Speed of Business: Implementation at the Speed of Business (Sap), Computing McGraw-Hill.
  21. OOPSLA 2001, Workshop on The Three Tier Architecture Pattern Language, Conference On Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications, http://oopsla.acm.org/oopsla2001/.
  22. Open Group, The Open Group Architectural Framework (TOGAF) - Version 7, November 2001
  23. Pereira, Carla Marques and Sousa, Pedro. 2003. Getting into the misalignment between Business and Information System, In 10th European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation. ECITE Press
  24. Spewak, Steven H. and Hill, Steven C. 1992. Enterprise Architecture Planning: Developing a Blueprint for Data, Applications and Technology, Wiley-QED Publication
  25. Stevenson, Dennis A., 1995, Enterprise Architecture, http://users.iafrica.com/o/om/omisditd/denniss/text/ea4 domai.html
  26. Tissot, Florence, and Wes Crump, , 1998. An Integrated Enterprise Modeling Environment, P. Bernus, K. Mertins, G. Schmidt (Eds.), Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, Springer, pp.59-79, ISBN 3- 540-64453-9.
  27. UML Proposal to the Object Management Group, 1997. http://www.rational.com/uml
  28. Vasconcelos, A., A. Caetano, J. Neves, P. Sinogas, R. Mendes, and J. Tribolet, 2001. A Framework for Modeling Strategy, Business Processes and Information Systems, Proceedings of 5th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference EDOC, Seatle, USA.
  29. Vasconcelos, A., Mendes, R., and Tribolet,J., 2004. Using Organizational Modeling to Evaluate Health Care IS/IT Projects, Proceedings of 37th Annual Hawaii Internatio-nal Conference On System Sciences (HICCS37), USA.
  30. Vasconcelos, A., Sousa, P., and Tribolet, J., 2003. Information System Architectures: Representation, Planning and Evaluation, Proceedings of International Conference on Computer, Communication and Control Technologies Orlando, U.S.A..
  31. Wagner, W, 2003 (access date). IS Management and Evaluation of Alternate IT Architectures, http://www91.homepage.villanova.edu/william.wagner/ MBA8520/itevalb.ppt.
  32. Zachman, John, 1987. A Framework for Information System Architecture, IBM System Journal Vol.26 Nº 3, p.276 - 292
  33. Zijden, S., Goedvolk, H. and Rijsenbrij, D., 2000. Architecture: Enabling Business and IT Alignment in Information System Development. http://www.cs.vu.nl/daan/
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Vasconcelos A., Marques Pereira C., Sousa P. and Tribolet J. (2004). OPEN ISSUES ON INFORMATION SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DOMAIN: THE VISION . In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 972-8865-00-7, pages 273-282. DOI: 10.5220/0002640702730282


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis04,
author={André Vasconcelos and Carla Marques Pereira and Pedro Sousa and José Tribolet},
title={OPEN ISSUES ON INFORMATION SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DOMAIN: THE VISION},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2004},
pages={273-282},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002640702730282},
isbn={972-8865-00-7},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - OPEN ISSUES ON INFORMATION SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH DOMAIN: THE VISION
SN - 972-8865-00-7
AU - Vasconcelos A.
AU - Marques Pereira C.
AU - Sousa P.
AU - Tribolet J.
PY - 2004
SP - 273
EP - 282
DO - 10.5220/0002640702730282