BUSINESS PROCESS VISUALIZATION – USE CASES, CHALLENGES, SOLUTIONS

Stefanie Rinderle, Ralph Bobrik, Manfred Reichert, Thomas Bauer

Abstract

The proper visualization and monitoring of their (ongoing) business processes is crucial for any enterprise. Thus a broad spectrum of processes has to be visualized ranging from simple, short–running processes to complex long–running ones (consisting of up to hundreds of activities). In any case, users shall be able to quickly understand the logic behind a process and to get a quick overview of related tasks. One practical problem arises when different fragments of a business process are scattered over several systems where they are often modeled using different process meta models (e.g., High–Level Petri Nets). The challenge is to find an integrated and user–friendly visualization for these business processes. In this paper we discover use cases relevant in this context. Since existing graph layout approaches have focused on general graph drawing so far we further develop a specific approach for layouting business process graphs. The work presented in this paper is embedded within a larger project (Proviado) on the visualization of automotive processes.

References

  1. Bobrik, R., Reichert, M., and Bauer, T. (2005). Requirements for the visualization of system-spanning business processes. In DEXA'05, pages 948-954.
  2. Brandes, U. and Köpf, B. (2002). Fast and simple horizontal coordinate assignment. In GD01.
  3. de Fraysseix, H., Pach, J., and Pollack, R. (1988). Small sets supporting fary embeddings of planar graphs. In STOC'88, pages 426-433.
  4. Diguglielmo, G., Durocher, E., Kaplan, P., Sander, G., and Vasiliu, A. (2002). Graph layout for workflow applications with ILOG jViews. In Proc. GD02.
  5. Eades, P., Lin, T., and Lin, X. (1993). Two tree drawing conventions. Computional Geometry & Applications, 3(2):133-153.
  6. Fleischer, R. and Hirsch, C. (2001). Graph drawing and its applications. In Grawing Graphs: Methods and Models, pages 1-21.
  7. Frick, A., Ludwig, A., and Mehldau, H. (1994). A fast adaptive layout algorithm for undirected graphs. In GD94.
  8. Fruchterman, T. and Reingold, E. (1991). Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software Practice and Experience, 21(11):1129-1164.
  9. Hong, S., Eades, P., Quigley, A., and Lee, S. (1998). Drawing algorithms for series-parallel digraphs in two and three dimensions. In Proc. GD98, pages 198-209.
  10. Kikusts, P. and Rucevskis, P. (1995). Layout algorithms of graph-like diagrams for GRADE windows graphic editors. In Proc. GD95, pages 361-364.
  11. Liu, D. and Shen, M. (2003). Workflow modeling for virtual processes: An order-preserving process-view approach. Information Systems, 28(6):505-532.
  12. Purchase, H. (2002). Metrics for graph drawing aesthetics. Visual Languages and Computing, 13:501-516.
  13. Reichert, M. and Dadam, P. (1998). ADEPTflex - supporting dynamic changes of workflows without losing control. JIIS, 10(2):93-129.
  14. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., and Dadam, P. (2004). Flexible support of team processes by adaptive workflow systems. DPD, 16(1):91-116.
  15. Sadiq, W. and Orlowska, M. (2000). Analyzing process models using graph reduction techniques. Information Systems, 25(2):117-134.
  16. Schönhage, B., van Ballegooij, A., and Elliens, A. (2000). 3D gadgets for business process visualization - a case study. In Web3D - VRML 2000, pages 131-138.
  17. Six, J. and Tollis, I. (2002). Automated visualization of process diagrams. In Proc. GD01, pages 45-59.
  18. Sugiyama, K. (2002). Graph Drawing and Applications for Software and Knowledge Engineering. Series on Software Eng. & Knowledge Eng. World Scientific.
  19. Wittenburg, K. and Weitzman, L. (1996a). Process visualization in ShowBiz. In Proc. GD96.
  20. Wittenburg, K. and Weitzman, L. (1996b). Relational grammars: Theory and practice in a visual language interface for process modeling. In In Proc. Workshop on Theory of Visual Languages, Gubbio, Italy.
  21. Yang, Y., Lai, W., Shen, J., Huang, X., J.Yan, and Setiawa, L. (2004). Effective visualisation of workflow enactment. In APWeb'04, pages 794-803.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Rinderle S., Bobrik R., Reichert M. and Bauer T. (2006). BUSINESS PROCESS VISUALIZATION – USE CASES, CHALLENGES, SOLUTIONS . In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-972-8865-43-6, pages 204-211. DOI: 10.5220/0002452402040211


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis06,
author={Stefanie Rinderle and Ralph Bobrik and Manfred Reichert and Thomas Bauer},
title={BUSINESS PROCESS VISUALIZATION – USE CASES, CHALLENGES, SOLUTIONS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2006},
pages={204-211},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002452402040211},
isbn={978-972-8865-43-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - BUSINESS PROCESS VISUALIZATION – USE CASES, CHALLENGES, SOLUTIONS
SN - 978-972-8865-43-6
AU - Rinderle S.
AU - Bobrik R.
AU - Reichert M.
AU - Bauer T.
PY - 2006
SP - 204
EP - 211
DO - 10.5220/0002452402040211