TOWARDS AN ONTOLOGY OF LMS - A Conceptual Framework

Gabriela Díaz-Antón, María A. Pérez

Abstract

Learning Management Systems (LMS) are used widely to support training in an organization. Selecting and implementing an LMS can have an impact in cost, time and customer satisfaction in the organization. Due to the existence of a variety of definitions on the subject of e-learning and LMS, it is necessary a conceptual framework using an ontology. This article presents a research in progress whose final objective is to develop a method to select, deploy and integrate an LMS into an organization with a systemic quality approach. As a first step, in this article is presented an ontology to conceptualize the terms associated to LMS, unifying them through their relations.

References

  1. Beshears, F. 2001. Learning Management System Evaluation Framework. Retrieved online June 15 2005 from
  2. Bowles, M. 2004. Relearning To E-learn: Strategies For Electronic Learning And Knowledge. Carlton. Melbourne University Press. Australia, 198 pp.
  3. Brockbank, B. 2003. Learning Management System for elearning, in The AMA handbook of e-learning: Effective design, implementation, and technology solutions. Piskurich, G.(Ed.).AMACON. NY. USA.
  4. COL, 2003. COL LMS Open Source, Commonwealth of Learning, Retrieved online June 15 2005 from: http://www.col.org/Consultancies/03LMSOpenSource. htm
  5. COL, 2004. LMS Evaluation Tool User Guide, Commonwealth of Learning, 3waynet Inc. Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved online June 15 2005 from:http://www.col.org/Consultancies/04LMSEvalua tion.htm
  6. Dean, C., 2002. Technology based training & on-line learning: An overview of authoring systems and learning management systems available in UK. Retrieved online June 15 2005 from: http://www.peak.co.uk/AuthoringSystem.pdf
  7. Edutech, 2003. Evaluation of Learning Management Systems, Retrieved online June 15 2005 from: http://www.edutech.ch/lms/ev2.php
  8. Edutech, 2005. Evaluation of Open Source Learning Management Systems, Retrieved online June 15 2005 from: http://www.edutech.ch/lms/ev3/index.php
  9. Fallon,C. and Brown, S., 2002. Learning Standards: A Guide to Purchasing, Developing, and Deploying Standards-Conformant E-Learning. CRC Press.256 pp.
  10. Fernández, E., 2003. E-learning: Implantación de proyectos de formación online. RA-MA Editorial, Madrid, España.
  11. Hall, B., 2005a. New Technology definitions. Retrieved online June 15 2005 from: www.brandonhall.com/public/glossary/
  12. Hall, B., 2005b. LMSs and LCMSs Demystified. Whitepaper. Retrieved online June 15 2005 from: http://www.brandonhall.com/public/resources/lms_lc ms/lms_lcms.htm
  13. Hollander, N., 2000. A guide to software package evaluation and selection: The R2ISC Method. AMACON. American Management Association. New York. USA.
  14. Howard, C., 2003. Selecting a Learning Management System.. Bersin & Associates. Retrieved online June, 15 2005 from: http://www.bersin.com/presentations/Selecting_an_L MS_OLLO_2003.pdf
  15. JOIN, 2005. OS LMS evaluation. Retrieved online June 15 2005 from: http://www.ossite.org/join/es/lms/
  16. Kanahele, C., 2003. Learning Portals, in The AMA handbook of e-learning: Effective design, implementation, and technology solutions. Piskurich, G.(Editor). AMACON, New York. USA.
  17. Kaplan, E. E-learning Glossary. Retrieved online June 15 2005 from: http://www.learningcircuits.org/glossary.html
  18. Nichami, M. (2001) “LCMS= LMS+ CMS [RLOs]” ElearningPost. Retrieved online June 15 2005 from: http://www.elearningpost.com/features/archives/00102 2.asp
  19. Noy, N. and McGuinness, D. (2001). “Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology”. Retrieved online June 15 2005 from: http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/papers/ontolo gy-tutorial-noy-mcguinness.pdf
  20. Papshew A.., 2005. Implementing LMS Beyond the Technology. In The LMS/LCMS Implementation & Management Syposium. Retrieved online June 15 2005 from: http://www.elearningguild.com/pdf/17/lms05_- _702_-_papshev.pdf
  21. Piskurich, G., G.(Edt), 2003. The AMA handbook of elearning: Effective design, implementation, and technology solutions. AMACON, American Management Association. New York. USA.
  22. Rosenberg, M. (2001) “E-learning: Estrategias para transmitir conocimiento en la era digital”. McGrawHill, Bogotá, Colombia.
  23. WCET-EduTools (2005). “Edutools: providing decision making tools for the E-D-U community”. Retrieved online June, 15 2005 from http://www.edutools.info/
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Díaz-Antón G. and A. Pérez M. (2006). TOWARDS AN ONTOLOGY OF LMS - A Conceptual Framework . In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS, ISBN 978-972-8865-45-0, pages 161-164. DOI: 10.5220/0002463901610164


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis06,
author={Gabriela Díaz-Antón and María A. Pérez},
title={TOWARDS AN ONTOLOGY OF LMS - A Conceptual Framework},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS,},
year={2006},
pages={161-164},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002463901610164},
isbn={978-972-8865-45-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS,
TI - TOWARDS AN ONTOLOGY OF LMS - A Conceptual Framework
SN - 978-972-8865-45-0
AU - Díaz-Antón G.
AU - A. Pérez M.
PY - 2006
SP - 161
EP - 164
DO - 10.5220/0002463901610164