SOURCE SENSITIVE ARGUMENTATION SYSTEM

Chee Fon Chang, Peter Harvey, Aditya Ghose

Abstract

There exist many approaches to agent-based conflict resolution. Of particular interest are approaches which adopt argumentation as their underlying conflict resolution machinery. In most argumentation systems, the argument source plays a minimal role. We feel that ignoring this important attribute of human argumentation reduces the capabilities of current argumentation systems. This paper focuses on the importance of sources in argumentation and extends this to the notion of credibility of agents.

References

  1. Bondarenko, A., Dung, P. M., Kowalski, R. A., and Toni, F. (1997). An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 93:63-101.
  2. Brewka, G. (2001). Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus. Journal of Logic and Computation, 11.
  3. Carbogim, D. V. (2000). Dynamics in Formal Argumentation. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh. College of Science and Engineering. School of Informatics.
  4. Dung, P. M. (1995). An argumentation-theoretic foundations for logic programming. Journal of Logic Programming, 22(2):151-171.
  5. Dung, P. M. and Son, T. C. (2001). An argument-based approach to reasoning with specificity. Artificial Intelligence, 133(1-2):35-85.
  6. Harvey, P., Chang, C. F., and Ghose, A. (2005a). Practical application of support based distributed search. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with AI.
  7. Harvey, P., Chang, C. F., and Ghose, A. (2005b). Support-based distributed search. In Meisels, A., editor, Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Distributed Constraint Reasoning. http://www.dsl.uow.edu.au/people/harvey/dcr05.pdf.
  8. Harvey, P., Chang, C. F., and Ghose, A. (2006). Supportbased distributed search. In Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multi Agent Systems.
  9. Jennings, N. R., Parsons, S., Noriega, P., and Sierra, C. (1998). On argumentation-based negotiation. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on MultiAgent Systems, Boston, USA.
  10. Kraus, S., Sycara, K. P., and Evenchik, A. (1998). Reaching agreements through argumentation: A logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence, 104(1- 2):1-69.
  11. Parsons, S., Sierra, C., and Jennings, N. R. (1998). Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):261-292.
  12. Pollock, J. L. (1970). The structure of epistemic justification. American Philosophical Quarterly, monograph series 4:62-78.
  13. Pollock, J. L. (1991). Self-defeating arguments. Minds and Machines, 1(4):367-392.
  14. Prakken, H. (1993). An argumentation framework in default logic. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 9(1-2):93-132. Bibsource = DBLP,http://dblp.uni-trier.de.
  15. Prakken, H. (2001). Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation. Synthese, 127(1):187-219.
  16. Prakken, H. and Vreeswijk, G. (2002). Logics for Defeasible Argumentation, volume 4 of Handbook of Philosophical Logic, pages 218-319. Kluwer Academic Publishers, second edition edition.
  17. Sierra, C., Jennings, N. R., Noriega, P., and Parsons, S. (1997). A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In Singh, M. P., Rao, A. S., and Wooldridge, M., editors, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, pages 177-192.
  18. Verheij, B. H. (1994). Reason based logic and legal knowledge representation. In Carr, I. and Narayanan, A., editors, Proceedings of the 4th National Conference on Law, Computers and Artificial Intelligence, pages 154-165. University of Exeter.
  19. Vreeswijk, G. (1997). Abstract argumentation systems. Artificial Intelligence, 90(1-2):225-279.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Fon Chang C., Harvey P. and Ghose A. (2006). SOURCE SENSITIVE ARGUMENTATION SYSTEM . In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS, ISBN 978-972-8865-42-9, pages 39-46. DOI: 10.5220/0002464800390046


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis06,
author={Chee Fon Chang and Peter Harvey and Aditya Ghose},
title={SOURCE SENSITIVE ARGUMENTATION SYSTEM},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,},
year={2006},
pages={39-46},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002464800390046},
isbn={978-972-8865-42-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,
TI - SOURCE SENSITIVE ARGUMENTATION SYSTEM
SN - 978-972-8865-42-9
AU - Fon Chang C.
AU - Harvey P.
AU - Ghose A.
PY - 2006
SP - 39
EP - 46
DO - 10.5220/0002464800390046