BRIDGING THE LANGUAGE-ACTION PERSPECTIVE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SEMIOTICS IN SDBC

Boris Shishkov, Jan L. G. Dietz, Kecheng Liu

Abstract

Achieving an adequate business-software alignment should include capturing essential aspects that concern the studied business reality as well as reflecting them in the software specification. This concerns semantic and pragmatic aspects, such as meanings, intentions, negotiations, commitments, and obligations, whose appropriate consideration is beyond the capabilities of current software design methods which focus just on formal language structures and data records. Organizational Semiotics allows for an adequate consideration of essential semantic aspects in conducting a business process modeling. The Language-Action Perspective is capable of grasping pragmatics on top of that. Some examples of combining LAP and OS have demonstrated benefits when conducting business process modeling, for the purpose of further specification of software. To further this work, it is necessary that LAP and OS are incorporated in a modeling framework which integrates business process modeling and software specification. The SDBC approach applies the LAP and OS theories, in order to address the business-software alignment challenge. They support the business process modeling in SDBC, which results in the identification of re-usable business process models and their mapping to software specification, in consistency with the current software design standards. Thus, it is feasible to expect that a LAP-OS combination could bring value to the current application development, in the context of the approach SDBC. In this paper, we further elaborate our SDBC-driven views on how LAP and OS can be combined for a sound business process modeling which builds a foundation for software specification.

References

  1. Dietz, J.L.G, 2006. Enterprise Ontology - Theory and Methodology. Springer Verlag, Berlin New York, 2006.
  2. Dietz, J.L.G, 2004. Basic notions regarding business processes and supporting information systems. In CAiSE'04 Workshops in connection with the 16rd International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. CAiSE Press.
  3. Dietz, J.L.G, 2003. The atoms, molecules, and fibers of organizations. Data & Knowledge Engineering, vol. 47.
  4. D'Souza, D.f. and A.C. Willis, 1998. Object, components, and frameworks with UML, the Catalysis approach. Addison-Wesley, USA.
  5. Gibson, J.J., 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, USA: Houghton Mifflin.
  6. Goldkuhl, G. and K. Lyytinen, 1982. A language action view of information systems. In: Ginzberg, M., Ross, C.A. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information Systems Engineering, TIMS/SMIS/ACM.
  7. Liu, K., 2000. Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Object Management Group (OMG), 2003. MDA - Guide, V1.0.1, omg/03-06-01.
  9. Shishkov, B., 2005. Software Specification Based on Reusable Business Components. Delft, The Netherlands: Sieca Repro.
  10. Shishkov B. and J.L.G. Dietz, 2005. Applying componentbased UML-driven conceptual modeling in SDBC. In ICEIS'05, 7th Int. Conference on Enterprise Inf. Systems. ICEIS Press.
  11. Shishkov B. and J.L.G. Dietz, 2004-1. Aligning business process modeling and software specification in a component-based way, the advantages of SDBC. In ICEIS'04, 6th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. ICEIS Press.
  12. Shishkov B. and J.L.G. Dietz, 2004-2. Design of software applications using generic business components. In HICSS'04, 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society Press.
  13. Shishkov B. and J.L.G. Dietz, 2004-3. Deriving Use Cases from Business Processes, The Advantages of DEMO. Enterprise Inf. Systems V, Ed: O. Camp, J.B.L. Filipe, S. Hammoudi, M. Piattini, Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht/Boston/London.
  14. Stamper, R., 2000. Organizational Semiotics - Information Without the Computer? Information, Organization, and Technology - Studies in Organizational Semiotics, K. Liu, R.J. Clarke, P.B. Andersen, R.K. Stamper, ed., NL: Kluwer.
  15. Winograd, T. and F. Flores, 1986. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Shishkov B., L. G. Dietz J. and Liu K. (2006). BRIDGING THE LANGUAGE-ACTION PERSPECTIVE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SEMIOTICS IN SDBC . In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-972-8865-43-6, pages 52-60. DOI: 10.5220/0002487700520060


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis06,
author={Boris Shishkov and Jan L. G. Dietz and Kecheng Liu},
title={BRIDGING THE LANGUAGE-ACTION PERSPECTIVE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SEMIOTICS IN SDBC},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2006},
pages={52-60},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002487700520060},
isbn={978-972-8865-43-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - BRIDGING THE LANGUAGE-ACTION PERSPECTIVE AND ORGANIZATIONAL SEMIOTICS IN SDBC
SN - 978-972-8865-43-6
AU - Shishkov B.
AU - L. G. Dietz J.
AU - Liu K.
PY - 2006
SP - 52
EP - 60
DO - 10.5220/0002487700520060