A SERVICE-ORIENTED FRAMEWORK FOR MANNED AND UNMANNED SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT NETWORK-CENTRIC OPERATIONS

Norbert Oswald, André Windisch, Stefan Förster, Herwig Moser, Toni Reichelt

Abstract

Network-centricity and autonomy are two buzzwords that have found increasing attention since the beginning of this decade in both, the military and civil domain. Although various conceptions exist of which capabilities are required for a system to be considered network-centric or autonomous, there can hardly be found proposals or prototypes that describe concrete transformations for both capabilities into software. The presented paper reviews work accomplished at EADS Military Air Systems driven by the need to develop an infrastructure that supports the realisation of both concepts in software with respect to traditional and modern software engineering principles, e.g., re-use and service-oriented development. This infrastructure is provided in form of a prototypical framework, accompanied by configuration and monitoring tools. Tests in a complex scenario requiring network-centricity and autonomy have shown that a significant technical readiness level can be reached by using the framework for mission software development.

References

  1. Alberts, D. S. (2003). Network centric warfare: curent status and way ahead. Defence Science, 8(3).
  2. Buschmann, F., Meunier, R., Rohnert, H., Sommerlad, P., and Stal, M. (1996). Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture: A Systen of Patterns, volume 1. Wiley.
  3. Castelfranchi, C. and Falcone, R. (2003). From automaticity to autonomy: The frontier of artificial agents. In Hexmoor, H., editor, Agent Autonomy, Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations, chapter 6. Kluwer.
  4. Chapman, W. G. (1997). Organizational concepts for sensor-to-shooter world. Master's thesis, School of Advanced Airpower Studies, Alabama.
  5. Clough, B. (2002). Metrics, Schmetrics! How The Heck Do You Determine A UAV's Autonomy Anyway? NIST Special Publication, (990):313-319.
  6. Craig, I. (1995). Blackboard Systems. Ablex Publ.Corp.
  7. DoD (2003a). DoD Architecture Framework Version 1.0. DoD Architecture Framework Group.
  8. DoD (2003b). Joint technical architecture. http://www. acq.osd.mil/osjtf/pdf/jta-vol-I.pdf .
  9. Freed, M., Harris, R., and Shafto, M. G. (2004). Humans vs. Autonomous Control of UAV Surveillance. In 1st Intelligent Systems Tech. Conf., Chicago, USA.
  10. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnsen, R., and Vlissides, J. (1995). Design Patterns. Addison-Wesley.
  11. Georgeff, M., Pell, B., Pollack, M., Tambe, M., and Wooldridge, M. (1999). The belief-desire-intention model of agency. In Müller, J., Singh, M. P., and Rao, A. S., editors, ATAL 7898, volume 1555, pages 1-10. Springer.
  12. IEEE (2000). IEEE Std 1516-2000: IEEE Standard for Modeling and Simulation High Level Architecture. IEEE, New York, NY, USA.
  13. JAUS (2006). Joint architecture for unmanned systems. http://www.jauswg.org.
  14. Karim, S. and Heinze, C. (2005). Experiences with the design and implementation of an agent-based autonomous uav controller. In AAMAS 7805, pages 19-26, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press.
  15. NATO (2005). C3 technical architecture. http://194.7. 80.153/website/home.asp.
  16. NCOIC (2005). An introduction to the network centric operations industry consortium (ncoic). Technical report, NCOIC.
  17. North, R., Browne, N., and Schiavone, L. (2006). Joint tactical radio system - connecting the GIG to the tactical edge. In MILCOM'06.
  18. OASIS (2006). Reference model for service-oriented architectures. http://doc.oasis-open.org/soa-rm/ v1.0/soa-rm.pdf .
  19. OMG (2005). Data distribution portal. http://portals. omg.org/dds.
  20. Oswald, N. (2004). Towards a Conceptual FrameworkBased Architecture for Unmanned Systems. In ICINCO 7804, pages 118-126, Setúbal, Portugal.
  21. Reichelt, T. (2006). Communication mapping for enterprise service architectures over heterogeneous transport media. Master's thesis, Chemnitz University.
  22. SCA (2006). Service component architecture. http:// osoa.org/display/Main/Home.
  23. Schmidt, D. C. (1999). Wrapper facade: A structural pattern for encapsulating functions with classes. C++ Report.
  24. SEI, C. (1997). Defense information infrastructure common operating environment. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/ str/descriptions/diicoe_body.html.
  25. Siegel, J. (2000). CORBA 3: Fundamentals and Programming Second Edition. OMG Press.
  26. von Clausewitz, C. (1832). Vom Kriege. Dümmlers Verlag.
  27. W3C (2004). Web services architecture. Technical report.
  28. Windisch, A., Fischer, M., and Förster, S. (2002). A re-use orientated design methodology for future integrated modular avionics systems. In FAST'02, pages 147- 153, London, UK.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Oswald N., Windisch A., Förster S., Moser H. and Reichelt T. (2007). A SERVICE-ORIENTED FRAMEWORK FOR MANNED AND UNMANNED SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT NETWORK-CENTRIC OPERATIONS . In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1: ICINCO, ISBN 978-972-8865-82-5, pages 284-291. DOI: 10.5220/0001649702840291


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icinco07,
author={Norbert Oswald and André Windisch and Stefan Förster and Herwig Moser and Toni Reichelt},
title={A SERVICE-ORIENTED FRAMEWORK FOR MANNED AND UNMANNED SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT NETWORK-CENTRIC OPERATIONS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1: ICINCO,},
year={2007},
pages={284-291},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001649702840291},
isbn={978-972-8865-82-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1: ICINCO,
TI - A SERVICE-ORIENTED FRAMEWORK FOR MANNED AND UNMANNED SYSTEMS TO SUPPORT NETWORK-CENTRIC OPERATIONS
SN - 978-972-8865-82-5
AU - Oswald N.
AU - Windisch A.
AU - Förster S.
AU - Moser H.
AU - Reichelt T.
PY - 2007
SP - 284
EP - 291
DO - 10.5220/0001649702840291