E-NEGOTIATION SYSTEMS DESIGN ISSUES

Morad Benyoucef, Antonio Silva

Abstract

Most design frameworks for e-negotiation systems have focused on achieving higher efficiency and lower transaction costs and, to a lesser extent, easy development and deployment. However, they have neglected the most important element in a negotiation: the user. In fact, no framework has properly addressed usability requirements. Usability must not only be the cornerstone of e-negotiation systems, but also serve as a driver for their development. This paper presents the five phases essential to an e-negotiation system development process and addresses how usability requirements and evaluation should be used to guide the process.

References

  1. Bartolini, C. and Preist, C., A Framework for Automated Negotiation, HP Labs Bristol, Tech Report HPL-2001- 90, 2001.
  2. Bartolini, C., Preist, C., and Jennings, N. R., A Software Framework for Automated Negotiation(Revised and Updated), HP Labs Bristol, Tech Report HPL-2006- 33, 2006.
  3. Benyoucef, M. and R. Keller and S. Lamouroux and J. Robert and V. Trussart, Towards a generic enegotiation platform, Proc. of the Sixth Conf. on ReTechnologies for Information Systems, pp. 95-109, Zurich, Switzerland, 2000.
  4. Benyoucef, M. and Rinderle, S., Modeling e-Negotiation Processes for a Service Oriented Architecture, Group Decision and Negotiation Journal 15:449-467, 2006.
  5. Benyoucef, M. and Verrons, M. H., Configurable eNegotiation Systems for Large Scale and Transparent Decision Making, Proceedings of the GDN'2007 (to appear), 2007.
  6. Bichler, M, Kersten, G, and Strecker, S., Towards a Structured Design of Electronic Negotiations, Group Decision and Negotiation Journal 12:311-335, 2003.
  7. Blomberg J. et al: Ethnographic Field Methods and Their Relation to Design, Participatory Design: Principles and Practices (D. Schuler and A. Namioka - Editors), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1993, pp. 123-155.
  8. BPEL4WS, Business Process Execution Language for Web Services - Version 1.1, http://www128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/specification/wsbpel/, Accessed March 2006.
  9. Deshpande, Y., and Hansen, S., Web engineering: creating a discipline among disciplines. IEEE Multimedia, (April - June), 82-87, 2001.
  10. Dumas, J. S. and Redish, J. C., A Practical Guide to Usability Testing. Intellect, 1999.
  11. Fuggetta, A., Software Process - A Roadmap, Proceedings of the ICSE, pp. 25-34, 2000.
  12. Ginige, A., and Murugesan, S. (2001a). Web engineering: An introduction. IEEE Multimedia, 8(1), 14-18.
  13. Ginige, A. and Murugesan, S. (2001b). The essence of Web engineering: Managing the diversity and complexity of Web application development. IEEE Multimedia, 8(2), 22-25.
  14. Gould, J. and Lewis, C., Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 300- 311, March 1985.
  15. Kim, J., Kersten, G., Strecker, S. and Law, K. P., Developing Context-Independent E-Negotiation Systems using Software Protocol and Model-ViewController Design Pattern, Proceedings of the Montreal Conference on e-Technologies (MCeTech), 2006.
  16. Lowe, D., Web system requirements: An overview. Requirements Engineering, 8, 102-113, 2003.
  17. Mäkiö, J., Designing and Modeling B2B-Markets, Frontiers of E-Business Research, pp. 292-303, 2005.
  18. Neumann, D., Mäkiö, J. And Weinhardt, C., CAME - A Tool Set for Configuring Electronic Markets, Proceedings of the ECIS, 2005.
  19. Nielsen, J., Designing Web usability: The practice of simplicity, New Riders Publishing, 1999.
  20. Nielsen, J. and Mack R., Usability Inspection Methods, John Wiley and Sons, 1994.
  21. NIST. Web Metrics: Technical Overview, NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/WebTools/tech.html, accessed in March 2007.
  22. Pressman, R.S., Applying Web Engineering, Part 3. Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Perspective (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
  23. Strecker, S., Kersten, G., Kim, J. and Law, K. P., Electronic Negotiation Systems: The Invite Prototype, Proceedings of the Collaborative Business MKWI'06, Passau, Germany, 2006.
  24. Strobel, M and Weinhardt, C., The Montreal Taxonomy for Electronic Negotiations, Group Decision and Negotiation 12: 143-164, 2003.
  25. Wharton, C. et al, The Cognitive Walkthrough Method: A Practitioner's Guide, in J. Nielsen and R. Mack “Usability Inspection Methods”, Wiley & Sons, pp. 105-150, 1994.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Benyoucef M. and Silva A. (2007). E-NEGOTIATION SYSTEMS DESIGN ISSUES . In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on e-Business - Volume 1: ICE-B, (ICETE 2007) ISBN 978-989-8111-11-1, pages 84-89. DOI: 10.5220/0002114300840089


in Bibtex Style

@conference{ice-b07,
author={Morad Benyoucef and Antonio Silva},
title={E-NEGOTIATION SYSTEMS DESIGN ISSUES},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Second International Conference on e-Business - Volume 1: ICE-B, (ICETE 2007)},
year={2007},
pages={84-89},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002114300840089},
isbn={978-989-8111-11-1},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Second International Conference on e-Business - Volume 1: ICE-B, (ICETE 2007)
TI - E-NEGOTIATION SYSTEMS DESIGN ISSUES
SN - 978-989-8111-11-1
AU - Benyoucef M.
AU - Silva A.
PY - 2007
SP - 84
EP - 89
DO - 10.5220/0002114300840089