COMPARISON OF FIVE ARCHITECTURE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES ON DESIGN FOCUS, SECURITY AND STYLE

Csaba Egyhazy

Abstract

With the increasing complexity and size of software systems, defining and specifying software architectures becomes an important part of the software development process. In the past, many software architectures have been described and modeled in an ad hoc and informal manner. For the past 20 years, Architecture Description Languages (ADLs) have been proposed to facilitate the description and modeling of software architectures. This paper reviews the history of ADLs, selects five of them, and compares them based on their design focus, security modeling, and styles modelling.

References

  1. Abowd G., Allen R. and Garlan D., 1993, Using Style to Understand Descriptions of Software Architecture. Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT symposium on Foundations of software engineering Pages: 9 - 20
  2. Bass L., Clements P., and Kazman R., 2003, Software Architecture in Practice, Second Edition, AddisonWesley Professional; 2 edition, April, 2003
  3. Clements P. C., 1996, A Survey of Architecture Description Languages, International Workshop on Software Specifications & Design, Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Software Specification and Design
  4. Dashofy E. M., van der Hoek A. and Taylor R. N., 2002, An Infrastructure for the Rapid Development of XMLbased Architecture Description Languages, In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Software Engineering
  5. Dashofy, E. M, 2003, A Guide for Users of the xADL 2.0 Language First Revision, Institute for Software Research at the University of California
  6. Feiler P., Gluch D., Hudak J., Lewis B., 2004, Embedded System Architecture Analysis Using SAE AADL, Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh PA Software Engineering Inst
  7. Garlan D. and Notkin D., 2001, Formalizing design spaces: Implicit invocation mechanisms. In VDM'91: Formal Software Development Methods, page 31-44
  8. Garlan D. and Perry D., 1995, Introduction to the special issue on Software Architecture IEEE Transactions on Software Eng., April 1995.
  9. Garlan, D. Monroe R. and Wile D., 1997, ACME: An Architecture Description Language, Proceedings of CASCON 97, Toronto, Ontario, November 1997, pp. 169-183.
  10. Luckham, D. C. Vera J., Meldal S., 1995, Three Concepts of System Architecture, Technical Report: CSL-TR95-674, 1995
  11. Medividovic N. and Taylor R. N., 1996, A Classification and Comparison Framework for Software Architecture Description Languages IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Volume 26, Issue 1, 1996
  12. Moriconi M. and Riemenschneider R. A., 1997, Introduction to SADL 1.0: A Language for Specifying Software Architecture Hierarchies, SRI International 1997
  13. Perry D. E. and Wolf A. L., 1992, Foundations for the Study of Software Architecture, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 1992 Publishing Company, Singapore, pp. 1-39, 1993
  14. Rapide Design Team, 1997, Draft: Rapide 1.0 Types
  15. Ren, J. and Taylor R. N., 2005, A Secure Software Architecture Description Language, Department of Informatics, University of California, Irvine,
  16. Shaw M. and Garlan D., 1996, Software Architecture: Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline, Prentice Hall, 1996, Page 167.
  17. Shaw M. and Garlan D., 1993, An Introduction to Software Architecture, Advances in Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Series on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Vol 2, World Scientific
  18. Shaw M., 1989, Larger Scale Systems Require HigherLevel Abstractions, ACM, 1989
  19. Ron Morrison, Graham Kirby, Dharini Balasubramaniam, Kath Mickan, Flavio Oquendo, Sorana Cimpan, Brian Warboys, Bob Snowdon and R Mark Greenwood, 2004, Support for Evolving Software Architectures in the ArchWare ADL, IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA).
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Egyhazy C. (2007). COMPARISON OF FIVE ARCHITECTURE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES ON DESIGN FOCUS, SECURITY AND STYLE . In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-972-8865-90-0, pages 270-277. DOI: 10.5220/0002348002700277


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis07,
author={Csaba Egyhazy},
title={COMPARISON OF FIVE ARCHITECTURE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES ON DESIGN FOCUS, SECURITY AND STYLE},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2007},
pages={270-277},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002348002700277},
isbn={978-972-8865-90-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - COMPARISON OF FIVE ARCHITECTURE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES ON DESIGN FOCUS, SECURITY AND STYLE
SN - 978-972-8865-90-0
AU - Egyhazy C.
PY - 2007
SP - 270
EP - 277
DO - 10.5220/0002348002700277