INTERACTION IN CRITICAL SYSTEMS: CONQUESTS AND CHALLENGES

Marcos Salenko Guimarães, M. Cecília C. Baranauskas, Eliane Martins

Abstract

The need for critical systems is growing fast due to the demand on hardware and software systems for critical tasks that use to be executed exclusively by human beings. These critical systems require reliable interaction with users. Despite this fact, contributions from the interaction design field have progressed slowly. This work summarizes the main contributions from different fields to critical systems; presents some analysis based on a classification that helps to get different views and find out new possible research directions towards improving the quality of interaction with this type of system.

References

  1. Avizienis A., Laprie, J., Randell B., 2001. Fundamental Concepts of Dependability. Research Report N01145. Retrieved November 16, 2006, from http://www.cert.org/research/isw/isw2000/papers/table _of_contents.html.
  2. Baxter, G., Besnard, D., 2004. Cognitive Mismatches in the Cockpit: Will They Ever Be a Thing of the Past? In The Fight deck of the Future: Human Factors in Data links and Free flight conference. University of Nottingham Press.
  3. Connelly, S., Burmeister, J., MacDonald, A., Hussey, A., 2001. Extending and Evaluating a Pattern Language for Safety-Critical User Interfaces. In 6th Australian Workshop on Safety Critical Systems and Software. Australian Computer Society, Inc.
  4. Daouk, M., Leveson, N. G., 2001. An Approach to Human-Centered Design. In Workshop on Human Error and System Development. Retrieved October 24, 2006, from http://web.mit.edu/hfes/www/Resea rch.htm.
  5. Fields, R., Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Tahmassebi, S., 2000. Comparing Design Options for Allocating Communication Media in Cooperative Safety-Critical Contexts: A Method and a Case Study. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 4, 370- 398. ACM Press.
  6. Filipe, J. K., Felici, M., Anderson, S., 2003. Timed Knowledge-based Modelling and Analysis: On the dependability of Socio-technical Systems. In 8th International Conference on Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing: Agility and Hybrid Automation. Retrieved March 9, 2005, from http:// www.dirc.org.uk/publications/inproceedings/abstract.p hp?id=41.
  7. Galliers, J., Minocha S., 2000. An Impact Analysis Method for Safety-critical User Interface Design. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. ACM Press.
  8. Gurr C., Hardstone G., 2001. Implementing Configurable Information Systems: A Combined Social Science and Cognition Science Approach. In 4th International Conference on Cognitive Technology, 391-404. Springer-Verlag.
  9. Harrison, M., 2004a. Human Error Analysis and Reliability Assessment. In Workshop on Human Computer Interaction and Dependability. Retrieved May, 2, 2006 from http://www.laas.fr/IFIPWG/ Workshops& Meetings/46/05-Harrison.pdf.
  10. Harrison, M., 2004b. Aspects of Human Error: A brief introduction. In Workshop on Human Computer Interaction and Dependability. Retrieved May, 2, 2006, from http://www.laas.fr/IFIPWG /Workshops& Meetings/46/03-Harrison.pdf.
  11. Hopkin, V. D., 1995. Human Factors in Air Traffic Control, Taylor & Francis. London.
  12. Hollnagel, E., 1993. The Modelling of Loss of Control. In International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3, 44-49. IEEE Press.
  13. Johnson, C. W., 2003. Failure in Safety-Critical Systems: A Handbook of Incident and Accident Reporting. Glasgow University Press.
  14. Liu, K., 2000. Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Knight, J. C., 2004. An Introduction to Computing System Dependability. In 26th International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Press.
  16. Mackie, J., Sommerville, I., 2000. Failures of Healthcare Systems. In First Dependability IRC Workshop, 79-85. Edinburg University Press.
  17. Marhan, A., Paternò, F., Santoro, C., 2004. Improving Dependability through a Deviation Analysis on Distributed Tasks in Safety Critical Systems. In Workshop on Interdisciplinary Approaches to Achieving and Analysing System Dependability. Retrieved September 14, 2006, from http://hom epages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/michael.harrison/dsn/index.html.
  18. Palanque, P., Schyn, A., 2003. A Model-Based Approach for Engineering Multimodal Interactive System. In INTERACT03. IFIP.
  19. Palanque, P., Bastide, R., Paternò, F., 1997. Formal Specification as a Tool for Objective Assessment of Safety-Critical Interactive Systems. In INTERACT97, 323-330. ACM Press.
  20. Paternò, F., Santoro, C., Touzet, D., 2005. Adapting Interface Representations for Mobile Support in Interactive Safety Critical Contexts. In Workshop on Complexity in Design and Engineering. Glasgow University Press.
  21. Reeder, R. W., Maxion, R. A., 2006. User Interface Defect Detection by Hesitation Analysis. In International Conference on Dependable Systems & Networks. IEEE Press.
  22. Smith, S. P., Harrison, M. D., 2002a. Blending Descriptive and Numeric Analysis in Human Reliability Design. In 9th International Workshop on Interactive Systems: Design, Specification and Verification, 2545, 223-237. Springer.
  23. Smith, S. P., Harrison, M. D., 2002b. Augmenting Descriptive Scenario Analysis for Improvements in Human Reliability Design. In Symposium on Applied Computing. ACM Press.
  24. Stamper, R. K., 1973. Information in Business and Administrative Systems, John Wiley and Sons. New York.
  25. Vicente K. J., 2002. Ecological Interface Design: Progress and Challenges. In Human Factors, 44, 62-78. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Press.
  26. Vicente K. J., 1991. Representation Aiding for Problem Solving in Process Control System. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2, 1189-1194, IEEE Press.
  27. Vicente K. J., Christoffersen K., Pereklita A., 1995. Supporting Operator Problem Solving Through Ecological Interface Design. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 25, 529-545. IEEE Press.
  28. Vicente K. J., Torenvliet G. L., Jamieson G. A., 1998. Making the Most of Ecological Interface Design: The Role of Cognitive Style. In 4th Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems. IEEE Press.
  29. Vicente, K. J., Rasmussen, J., 1992. Ecological Interface Design: Theoretical Foundations. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 589-606. IEEE Press.
  30. Pap Z., Petri, D.,2001. A Design Pattern of the User Interface of Safety Critical Systems. In International Workshop on Control and Information Technology. Retrieved October 24, 2006, from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/pap01design.html.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Salenko Guimarães M., Cecília C. Baranauskas M. and Martins E. (2007). INTERACTION IN CRITICAL SYSTEMS: CONQUESTS AND CHALLENGES . In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS, ISBN 978-972-8865-92-4, pages 170-175. DOI: 10.5220/0002350201700175


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis07,
author={Marcos Salenko Guimarães and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas and Eliane Martins},
title={INTERACTION IN CRITICAL SYSTEMS: CONQUESTS AND CHALLENGES},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS,},
year={2007},
pages={170-175},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002350201700175},
isbn={978-972-8865-92-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS,
TI - INTERACTION IN CRITICAL SYSTEMS: CONQUESTS AND CHALLENGES
SN - 978-972-8865-92-4
AU - Salenko Guimarães M.
AU - Cecília C. Baranauskas M.
AU - Martins E.
PY - 2007
SP - 170
EP - 175
DO - 10.5220/0002350201700175