AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE PRACTICE

Marlies van Steenbergen, Martin van den Berg, Sjaak Brinkkemper

Abstract

In this paper we introduce an architecture maturity model for the domain of enterprise architecture. The model differs from other existing models in that it departs from the standard 5-level approach. It distinguishes 18 factors, called key areas, which are relevant to developing an architectural practice. Each key area has its own maturity development path that is balanced against the maturity development paths of the other key areas. Two real-life case studies are presented to illustrate the use of the model. Usage of the model in these cases shows that the model delivers recognizable results, that the results can be traced back to the basic approach to architecture taken by the organizations investigated and that the key areas chosen bear relevance to the architectural practice of the organizations.

References

  1. Appel, W., 2000. Architecture Capability Assessment. In Enterprise Planning & Architecture Strategies, vol.4, nr.7, METAGroup.
  2. Berg, M. van den, Steenbergen, M. van, 2003. Niveaus van werken onder architectuur (Levels of architectural maturity). In Informatie, vol. 45, nr. 2, pp. 52-56.
  3. Berg, M. van den, Steenbergen, M. van, 2006. Building an enterprise architecture practice. Springer, Dordrecht.
  4. Bucher, T., Fischer, R., Kurpjuweit, S., Winter, R., 2006. Enterprise Architecture Analysis and Application - An Exploratory Study. In EDOC workshop TEAR 2006. Hong Kong. Retrieved November 22, 2006, from tear2006.telin.nl.
  5. CMMI, 2002. CMMISM for Systems Engineering, Software Engineering, Integrated Product and Process Development, and Supplier Sourcing; (CMMISE/SW/IPPD/SS, V1.1) Staged Representation; CMU/SEI-2002-TR-012 ; ESC-TR-2002-012 .
  6. Gao, 2003. A framework for assessing and improving enterprise architecture management.
  7. Hartman, A, Sifonis, J., Kador, J., 2000. Net Ready: Strategies for Success in the E-conomy. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  8. Kaplan, R., Norton, D., 1992. The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. In Harvard Business Review, vol. 70, nr. 1, pp. 71-79.
  9. Koomen, T., Pol, M., 1999. Test Process Improvement, a practical step-by-step guide to structured testing. Addison-Wesley, Boston.
  10. Lankhorst et al, 2005. Enterprise Architecture at Work. Springer, Heidelberg.
  11. Martinsons, M., Davison, R., Tse, D., 1999. The balanced scorecard : a foundation for the strategic management of information systems. In Decision Support Systems vol. 25, pp. 71-88.
  12. METAgroup, 2001. Diagnostic for Enterprise Architecture, META Practice.
  13. NASCIO, 2003. NASCIO enterprise architecture maturity model.
  14. Wagter, R., Berg, M. van den, Luijpers, L., Steenbergen, M. van, 2001. Dynamic Enterprise Architecture: how to make it work. Wiley, Hoboken.
  15. Westbrock, T., 2004. Architecture Process Maturity Revisited and Revised. METAgroup Delta 2902.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

van Steenbergen M., van den Berg M. and Brinkkemper S. (2007). AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE PRACTICE . In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-972-8865-90-0, pages 14-22. DOI: 10.5220/0002362300140022


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis07,
author={Marlies van Steenbergen and Martin van den Berg and Sjaak Brinkkemper},
title={AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE PRACTICE},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2007},
pages={14-22},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002362300140022},
isbn={978-972-8865-90-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE PRACTICE
SN - 978-972-8865-90-0
AU - van Steenbergen M.
AU - van den Berg M.
AU - Brinkkemper S.
PY - 2007
SP - 14
EP - 22
DO - 10.5220/0002362300140022