A FRAMEWORK FOR ONTOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION OF BUSINESS PROCESS CONTENT

Maya Lincoln, Reuven Karni, Avi Wasser

Abstract

One of the main challenges currently facing the world of enterprise information technology in general and ERP/SCM/CRM systems in particular, is visibility into the business of organizations. The prevalent approach utilizes conceptual business process modeling as the foundation for creating and managing this visibility, aiming to connect business activity and its supporting information technology. While the phenomena of devising structural execution frameworks is widespread in academia, there have been few attempts to develop theory, empirical studies and supporting methods for the structured generation and customization of complete business process models that also include actual content. These models move beyond structural data modeling in the sense that they add semantics and relationships of actual business essence. The research suggests a framework and a set of methods for the organization and structured ontological construction of business process content.

References

  1. van der Aalst W.M.P., ter Hofstede A.H.M., and Weske M.. (2003). BPM 2003, volume 2678 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1-12. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  2. Karagiannis D., Kühn H. (2002). MetaModeling Platforms. Proceedings of the Third International Conference EC-Web 2002, volume 2455 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, page 182. SpringerVerlag, Berlin.
  3. Lincoln M., Karni R. A (2003) Generic Business Function Framework for Industrial Enterprises. CD Proceedings of 17th ICPR Conference, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
  4. Holland C.P., Light B.. (1999). A critical success factors model for ERP implementations, IEEE Software Volume 16, pages 30-35.
  5. Krumbholz M., Maiden N.. (2001). The implementation of enterprise resource planning packages in different organizational and national cultures, Information Systems 26, page 185-204.
  6. Rolland C., Prakash N.. (2000). Bridging the gap between organizational needs and ERP functionality, Requirements Eng. 41 180-193.
  7. Becker J., Rosemann M., von Uthmann C. (2000). Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. BPM2000: 30-49
  8. Fettke, P.; Loos, P.; Zwicker, J. (2005). Business Process Reference Models - Survey and Classification. In: Kindler, E.; Nottgens, M.: Business Process Reference Models - BPRM2005: 1-15.
  9. van der Aalst W.M. P., ter Hofstede A. H. M., Weske M.. (2003). Business Process Management: A Survey. BPM2003: 1-12
  10. Weske M., van der Aalst W. M. P., H. M., Verbeek W. (2004): Advances in business process management. Data Knowl. Eng. 50(1): 1-8
  11. van der Aalst W. M. P., ter Hofstede A. H. M.. (2005). YAWL: yet another workflow language. Inf. Syst. 30(4): 245-275.
  12. Dellarocas C., Klein M. (2000): A Knowledge-Based Approach for Designing Robust Business Processes. BPM2000: 50-65
  13. Bernstein A. (2003) Process Recombination: An Ontology Based Approach for Business Process Re-Design. SAP Design Guild, Vol. 7.
  14. Malone, T. W., Crowston, K. G., & Herman, G. (2003). Organizing Business Knowledge: The MIT Process Handbook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  15. Malone, T. W. (2004). The Future of Work: How the New Order of Business Will Shape Your Organization, Your Management Style, and Your Life. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  16. Wasser A., Lincoln M., Karni R., (2005). Accelerated Enterprise Process Modeling Through a Formalized Functional Typology. BPM2005: 446-451.
  17. Wasser A., Lincoln M., Karni R., (2006): ERP Reference Process Models: From Generic to Specific. Business Process Management Workshops 2006: 45-54
  18. Dori D., Reinhartz-Berger I. (2003). An OPM-Based Metamodel of System Development Process. Proceedings of ER 2003: 105-117.
  19. Rohloff, M. (2002). Das Prozessrahmenwerk der Siemens AG: Ein Referenzmodell für betriebliche Geschäftsprozesse als Grundlage einer systematischen Bebauung der IuK-Landschaft. In:: Wissensmanagement mit Referenzmodellen: Konzepte für die Anwendungssystem- und Organisationsgestaltung. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg 227-235.
  20. Maddern, H. and Maull, R. (2003). Second generation process thinking: a case study from UK financial services, Paper No. 03/07, Research Discussion Papers in Management, School of Business and Economics, University of Exeter, UK.
  21. MIT Process Handbook (Retrieved June 2006). www.mit.edu/ph.
  22. Kankanhalli, A., and Tan, B.C.Y. (2005). Knowledge Management Metrics: A Review and Directions for Future Research. International Journal of Knowledge Management (1:2), 20-32.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Lincoln M., Karni R. and Wasser A. (2007). A FRAMEWORK FOR ONTOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION OF BUSINESS PROCESS CONTENT . In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-972-8865-90-0, pages 257-263. DOI: 10.5220/0002393902570263


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis07,
author={Maya Lincoln and Reuven Karni and Avi Wasser},
title={A FRAMEWORK FOR ONTOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION OF BUSINESS PROCESS CONTENT},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2007},
pages={257-263},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002393902570263},
isbn={978-972-8865-90-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - A FRAMEWORK FOR ONTOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION OF BUSINESS PROCESS CONTENT
SN - 978-972-8865-90-0
AU - Lincoln M.
AU - Karni R.
AU - Wasser A.
PY - 2007
SP - 257
EP - 263
DO - 10.5220/0002393902570263