CONCEPTS FOR AUTONOMOUS COMMAND AND CONTROL

Fernando Escobar, John McDonnell

Abstract

The new Department of Defense (DOD) transformational doctrines for future battlefield operations emphasizes the need to more aggressively pursue program developments with unmanned systems technologies. Currently, there are ongoing Battle Experiments testing and assessing the operational performance of these technologies. These experiments in turn are uncovering current and future capability gaps that need to be fulfilled with aggressive research, engineering, test and evaluation. The Innovation Center at SPAWAR Systems Center, San Diego, has established a research and development process to better address Future Naval Capability gaps in the areas of both, Intelligent Autonomy and Autonomous Command and Control for Unmanned Systems. In this paper we report our research on two important components concepts for AC2: 1) Autonomous Resource Allocation, 2) Autonomy and Commanders Intent, and 3) A discussion on Self organizing C2.

References

  1. Alberts, D. S.: Agility, Focus, and Convergence: The Future of Command and Control. The International C2 Journal: Special Issue on The Future of C2, Vol. 1, No 1, (2007) 1-30.
  2. Joint Publication 1-02: Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, (Sep,2002).http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict.
  3. The Navy Unmanned Surface Vehicle (UUV) Master Plan. 23 July, 2007.
  4. The Navy Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (UUV) Master Plan. Nov. 9, 2004.
  5. US Army Field Manual (FM) 100-5, Operations (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, (GPO) 1982.
  6. J.L. Silva, “Aufragstaktik”, Infantry, September-October 1989, 6-7.
  7. Valdis Berzins., Lucia Luqi., Software enginnering with Abstractions, Addison-Wesley, Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston, MA, 1991
  8. P. Scerri, et al. “Coordinating very large groups of wide area search munitions,” Theory and Algorithms of Cooperative Systems, 2005.
  9. L. Parker, “ALLIANCE: An Architecture for fault-tolerant multi-robot cooperation,” IEEE Transactions of Robotics and Automation, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 220-240, 1998.
  10. C. Le Pape, “A combination of centralized and distributed methods for multi-agent planning and scheduling,” in Proceedigns of ICRA, 1990, pp. 448-493.
  11. S. Botelho and R. Alami, “M+: A Scheme for multi-robot cooperation through negotiated task allocation and achievement,” in Proceedings of ICRA, 1999, pp. 1234-1239.
  12. B. Gerkey and M. Mararic, “A formal analysis and taxonomy of task allocation in multi-robot systems,” International Journal of Robotics Research, vol.23, no. 9, pp. 939
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Escobar F. and McDonnell J. (2008). CONCEPTS FOR AUTONOMOUS COMMAND AND CONTROL . In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 2: MARS, (ICINCO 2008) ISBN 978-989-8111-31-9, pages 322-329. DOI: 10.5220/0001507403220329


in Bibtex Style

@conference{mars08,
author={Fernando Escobar and John McDonnell},
title={CONCEPTS FOR AUTONOMOUS COMMAND AND CONTROL},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 2: MARS, (ICINCO 2008)},
year={2008},
pages={322-329},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001507403220329},
isbn={978-989-8111-31-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 2: MARS, (ICINCO 2008)
TI - CONCEPTS FOR AUTONOMOUS COMMAND AND CONTROL
SN - 978-989-8111-31-9
AU - Escobar F.
AU - McDonnell J.
PY - 2008
SP - 322
EP - 329
DO - 10.5220/0001507403220329