ASSESSING THE PROGRESS OF IMPLEMENTING WEB ACCESSIBILITY - An Irish Case Study

Vivienne Trulock, Richard Hetherington

Abstract

In this paper we attempt to gauge the implementation of web accessibility guidelines in a range of Irish websites by undertaking a follow-up study in 2005 to one conducted by McMullin three years earlier (McMullin, 2002). Automatic testing against version 1.0 of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 1.0) using WebXact online revealed that accessibility levels had increased among the 152 sites sampled over the three-year period. Compliancy levels of A, AA and AAA had risen from the 2002 levels of 6.3%, 0% and 0% respectively to 36.2%, 8.6% and 3.3% in 2005. However, manual checks on the same sites indicated that the actual compliance levels for 2005 were 1.3%, 0% and 0% for A, AA and AAA. Of the sites claiming accessibility, either by displaying a W3C or ‘Bobby’ compliance logo, or in text on their accessibility statement page, 60% claimed a higher level than the automatic testing results indicated. When these sites were further manually checked it was found that all of them claimed a higher level of accessibility compliance than was actually the case. As most sites in the sample were not compliant with the WCAG 1.0 for the entire set of disabilities, the concept of ‘partial accessibility’ was examined by identifying those websites that complied with subsets of the guidelines particular to different disabilities. Some disability types fared worse than others. In particular blindness, mobility impairment and cognitive impairment each had full support from at most 1% of the websites in the study. Other disabilities were better supported, including partially-sighted, deaf and hearing impaired, and colour blind, where compliance was found in 11%, 23% and 32% of the websites, respectively.

References

  1. Brewer, J., 2004 Web Accessibility Highlights and Trends. Proceedings of W4A at WWW2004, May 18. 51-55. Retrieved December 13 2004 from http://portal.acm.org
  2. Disability Rights Commission, 2004. The Web: Access and Inclusion for Disabled People, London. Retrieved June 30, 2005 from http://www.drcgb.org/publicationsandreports/2.pdf
  3. European Commission, 2001. eEurope 2002: Accessibility of Public Web Sites and their Content. Retrieved June 28 2005 from http://europa.eu.int/eurlex/en/com/cnc/2001/com2001_0529en01.pdf
  4. European Commission & Council. 2000. An Information Society For All: Action Plan. Retrieved June 28, 2005 from http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/2002/ action_plan/pdf/actionplan_en.pdf
  5. Gallaudet Research Institute, 2003. Literacy & Deaf Students Retrieved April 20 2006 from http://gri.gallaudet.edu/Literacy/#reading
  6. Hackett, S., Parmanto, B. & Zeng, W., 2004. Accessibility of Internet Websites through Time. Proceedings of ASSEST'04, October 18-20. 32-39. Retrieved March 9 2005 from http://portal.acm.org
  7. Irish Government, 1998. Employment Equality Act. Retrieved March 30 2006 from http://www.gov.ie/bills28/acts/1998/a2198.pdf
  8. Irish Government, 2000. Equal Status Act. Retrieved 28 June 2005 from http://www.oireachtas.ie/documents/bills28/acts/2000/ a800.pdf
  9. Irish Government, 2005. Disability Act. Retrieved 30 March 2006 from http://www.oireachtas.ie/documents/bills28/acts/2005/ a1405.pdf
  10. Lazar. J., Beere, P., Greenidge, K. & Nagappa, Y., 2003. Web Accessibility in the Mid-Atlantic United States: A Study of 50 Home Pages. Retrieved June 16 2005 from http://triton.towson.edu/jlazar/web_accessibility_in_us.pdf
  11. Loiacono, E. & McCoy, S., 2004. Web site accessibility: an online sector analysis. Information Technology & People, 17(1), 87-101.Retrieved March 10 2005 from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0959-3845.htm
  12. McMullin, B., 2002. WARP: Web Accessibility Reporting Project Ireland 2002 Baseline Study. 1-82. Retrieved March 15 2005 from http://eaccess.rince.ie/whitepapers/2002/warp-2002-00/warp-2002-00.pdf
  13. Sullivan, T. & Matson R., 2000. Barriers to USE: Usability and Content Accessibility on the Webs Most Popular Sites. Proceedings of the Conference of Universal Usability. Arlington VA: ACM, 139-144. Retrieved December 13 2004 from http://portal.acm.org
  14. Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K. & Maeda, J. (2004). Accessibility Designer: Visualizing Usability for the Blind. ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing (77-78) 177-184. Retrieved March 9, 2005 from http://portal.acm.org
  15. Trulock, V., 2006. A Comparative Analysis of Accessibility Levels of Irish Websites. MSc Dissertation, Napier University.
  16. W3C, 1999. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Retrieved June 15 2005 from http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT
  17. W3C, 2008. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. W3C Working Draft 11 December 2007. Retrieved February 28 2008 from http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
  18. Williams, R. & Rattray, R., 2003. An assessment of web accessibility of UK accountancy firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(18), 710-716. Retrieved March 10 2005 from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/0268- 6902.htm
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Trulock V. and Hetherington R. (2008). ASSESSING THE PROGRESS OF IMPLEMENTING WEB ACCESSIBILITY - An Irish Case Study . In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8111-40-1, pages 105-111. DOI: 10.5220/0001667001050111


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis08,
author={Vivienne Trulock and Richard Hetherington},
title={ASSESSING THE PROGRESS OF IMPLEMENTING WEB ACCESSIBILITY - An Irish Case Study},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS,},
year={2008},
pages={105-111},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001667001050111},
isbn={978-989-8111-40-1},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS,
TI - ASSESSING THE PROGRESS OF IMPLEMENTING WEB ACCESSIBILITY - An Irish Case Study
SN - 978-989-8111-40-1
AU - Trulock V.
AU - Hetherington R.
PY - 2008
SP - 105
EP - 111
DO - 10.5220/0001667001050111