DESIGNING BUSINESS PROCESS MODELS FOR REQUIRED UNIFORMITY OF WORK

Kimmo Tarkkanen

Abstract

Business process and workflow models play important role in developing information system integration and later training of its usage. New ways of working and information system usage practices are designed with as-is and to-be process models, which are implemented into system characteristics. However, after the IS implementation the work practices may become differentiated. Variety of work practices on same business process can have unexpected and harmful social and economic consequences in IS-mediated work environment. This paper employs grounded theory methodology and a case study to explore non-uniformity of work in a Finnish retail business organization. By differentiating two types of non-uniform work tasks, the paper shows how process models can be designed with less effort, yet maintaining the required amount of uniformity by the organization and support for employees’ uniform actions. In addition to process model designers, the findings help organizations struggling with IS use practices’ consistency to separate practices that may emerge most harmful and practices that are not worth to alter.

References

  1. Curtis, B., Kellner, M. I., Over, J., 1992. Process Modelling. Communications of the ACM, 35, 75-90.
  2. Davenport, T. H., 1998. Putting enterprise into enterprisesystem. Harvard Business Rev iew, 3, 121-131.
  3. Ellis, C. A., 1999. Workflow Technology. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 29-54), John Wiley.
  4. Garfinkel, H., 1967. Common sense knowledge of social structures: the documentary method of interpretation in lay and professional fact finding. Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 76-103). Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
  5. Gasser, L., 1986. The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 3, 205-225.
  6. Giddens, A., 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge.
  7. Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A., 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies For Qualitative Research. Aldine, New York.
  8. Koivisto, J., 2004. Drifting work practices after EPR implementation: The case of a home health care organization. 4S/EASST, Public proofs - science, technology and democracy. 25-28.8.2004, Ecole des Mines de Paris, France.
  9. Koivisto, J., Aaltonen, S., Nurminen, M. I., Reijonen, P., 2004. Työkäytäntöjen yhtenäisyys tietojärjestelmän käyttöönoton jälkeen - tapaustutkimus Turun terveystoimen kotisairaanhoidosta. (Uniformity of work practices after IS implementation - a case study in home care.) The Finnish Work Environment Fund - project 990327. Turku Municipal Health Department Series A, 1/2004.
  10. Kortteinen, B., Nurminen, M. I., Reijonen, P., Torvinen, V., 1996. Improving IS deployment through evaluation: Application of the ONION model. In A. Brown & D. Remenyi (eds.) The Proceedings of Third European Conference on the Evaluation of Information Technology, 29 November 1996, Bath, UK. pp. 175 - 181.
  11. Mackulak, G. T., Lawrence, F. P., Colvin, T., 1998. Effective Simulation Model Reuse: a case study for amhs modelling. Proceedings of the 1998 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 979-984.
  12. Mark, G., Poltrock, S., 2003. Shaping Technology Across Social Worlds: groupware adoption in a distributed organization. In K. Schmidt, M. Pendergast, M. Tremaine & C. Simone (eds.) Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, GROUP'03, November 9- 12, 2003, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, pp. 284-293.
  13. Nurminen, M. I., Eriksson, I., 1999. Research notes Information systems research: the 'infurgic' perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 19, 87-94.
  14. Nurminen, M., I., Reijonen, P., Vuorenheimo, J., 2002. Tietojärjestelmän organisatorinen käyttöönotto: kokemuksia ja suuntaviivoja. (Organizational implementation of IS: experiences and guidelines). Turku Municipal Health Department Series A, 1/2002.
  15. Nutt, G. J., 1996. The Evolution Towards Flexible Workflow Systems. Distributed Systems Engineering, 3, 276-294.
  16. Prinz, W., Mark, G., Pankoke-Babatz, U., 1998. Designing groupware for congruency in use. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 373 - 382.
  17. Reijonen, P., Sjöros, A., 2001. Toimintatapojen vakiintuminen tietojärjestelmän käyttöönoton jälkeen. (Stabilization of the work practices after IS implementation). SoTeTiTe 2001 Conference, Kajaani, Finland 3-5.6.2001.
  18. Robinson, M., 1993. Design for unanticipated use. Proceedings of the third conference on European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 187 - 202.
  19. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W. M. P., 2005. Conformance testing: Measuring the fit and appropriateness of event logs and process models. Business Process Modelling BPM 2005 Workshops, LNCS 3812, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006, pp. 163-176.
  20. Sharp, A., McDermott, P., 2001. Workflow Modelling: tools for process improvement and applications development. Artech House, London.
  21. Silverman, D., 1993. Interpreting qualitative data. Sage, London.
  22. Suchman, L., 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Interaction. Cambridge University Press.
  23. Verbeek, H. M. W., van Dongen, B. F., Mendling, J., van der Aalst, W. M. P., 2006. Interoperability in the ProM framework. In T. Latour and M. Petit (eds.): Proceedings of the CAiSE'06 Workshops and Doctoral Consortium, Luxenbourg. Presses Universitaries de Namur, pp. 619-630.
  24. Volkoff, O., Strong, D. M., Elmes, M. B., 2005. Understanding enterprise systems-enabled integration. European journal of Information Systems, 14, 110- 120.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Tarkkanen K. (2008). DESIGNING BUSINESS PROCESS MODELS FOR REQUIRED UNIFORMITY OF WORK . In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8111-38-8, pages 21-29. DOI: 10.5220/0001681500210029


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis08,
author={Kimmo Tarkkanen},
title={DESIGNING BUSINESS PROCESS MODELS FOR REQUIRED UNIFORMITY OF WORK},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2008},
pages={21-29},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001681500210029},
isbn={978-989-8111-38-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - DESIGNING BUSINESS PROCESS MODELS FOR REQUIRED UNIFORMITY OF WORK
SN - 978-989-8111-38-8
AU - Tarkkanen K.
PY - 2008
SP - 21
EP - 29
DO - 10.5220/0001681500210029