AN APPROACH TO SUPPORT THE STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT OF SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS

André Luiz Becker, Jorge Luis Nicolas Audy, Rafael Prikladnicki

Abstract

The alignment between the strategy of a software process improvement program and the organizations’ business strategies has been mentioned as a critical factor of success. However, the main software process reference models do not explicitly guide the companies towards defining processes which meet their strategic goals. Based on this context, the purpose of this paper is to present a process for the strategic alignment of software process improvement programs. Preliminary results indicate benefits beyond the demands of a software process reference model itself, which include the planning and execution of a software process improvement program taking into account the organization’s strategic goals in a more systematic way.

References

  1. Akao, Y., 1990. The book, QFD: Integrating customer requirements into product design. Portland, Productivity Press.
  2. Biro, M., Tully, C., 1999. The Software Process in the Context of Business Goals and Performance. In Better Software Practice for Business Benefit: Principles and Experience. CS Press.
  3. Brodman, J.G., Johnson, D.L., 1995. Return on Investment (ROI) from Software Process Improvement as Measured by US Industry. In Software Process Improvement and Practice.
  4. Chrissis, M. B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S., 2003. The book, CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley.
  5. Cox, C. A., 1992. Keys to success in quality function deployment. In APICS-The Performance Advantage.
  6. McCoy, W. L., 1998. Interfacing Three Complementary Technologies: Strategic Planning, Process Modeling, and System Dynamics. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
  7. Debou, C., Courtel, D., Lambert, H.-B., Fuchs, N., Haux, M, 1999. Alcatel's Experience with Process Improvement. In Better Software Practice for Business Benefit: Principles and Experience. CS Press.
  8. Dybå, T., 2005. An Empirical Investigation of the Key Factors for Success in Software Process Improvement. In IEEE Trans. Software Eng., v. 31, n. 5, 2005, pp.410-424.
  9. Grady, R.B., 1997. The book, Successful Software Process Improvement. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  10. Hierholzer, A., Herzwurm, G., Schlang, H., 1998. Applying QFD for Software Process Improvement at SAP AG. In Proceedings of the World Innovation and Strategy Conference in Sydney, Australia.
  11. Humphrey, W.S., 1989. The book, Managing the Software Process. Addison-Wesley.
  12. ISO/IEC 15504-2, 2003. Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 2 - Performing an Assessment. In International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission. Genebra, ISO.
  13. Liu, X., Sun, Y., Kane, G., Kyoya, Y., Noguchi, K., 2005. QFD Application in Software Process Management and Improvement Based on CMM. In ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering. SESSION: Software Quality (WOSQ).
  14. Montoni, M., Santos, G., Rocha, A. R., Weber, K. C., Araújo. E. R., 2007. MPS Model and TABA Workstation: Implementing Software Process Improvement Initiatives in Small Settings. In WoSQapos;07: ICSE Workshops 2007. Volume, Issue, 20-26 May 2007 Page(s): 4 - 4
  15. Niazi, M., Wilson, D., Zowghi, D., 2003. A model for the implementation of software process improvement: A pilot study. In Journal of Systems and Software, ACM.
  16. Paulk, M.., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M., Weber, C. V., 1993. Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. Technical Report.
  17. Peterson, B., 1995. Transitioning the CMM into practice. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Process Improvement, Barcelona, Spain.
  18. Pitterman, B., 2000. Telcordia Technologies: The journey to high maturity. In IEEE Software.
  19. Pulford, K, Kuntzmann-Combelles, A., Shirlaw, and S., 1996. The book, A Quantitative Approach to Software Management. The AMI Handbook. Wokingham, England: Addison-Wesley.
  20. Weber, K., Araújo, E., Rocha, A., Machado, C., Scalet, D., Salviano, C. F., 2005. Brazilian Software Process Reference Model and Assessment Method. In Proceedings of 20th Int. Symp. on Computer and Info. Sciences, pp. 402-411, 2005.
  21. Yamamura, G., 1999. Software process satisfied employees. In IEEE Software.
  22. Yin, R., 2003. The book, Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications Inc.
  23. Zahran, S., 1998. The book, Software Process Improvement: Practical Guidelines for Business Success. Harlow, England: Addison-Wesley.
  24. Zaijun, H., 2005. Value-Centric Process Improvement for Small Organizations by Using QFD and CMMI. In Proceedings of the First International Research Workshop for Process Improvement in Small Settings.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Luiz Becker A., Luis Nicolas Audy J. and Prikladnicki R. (2008). AN APPROACH TO SUPPORT THE STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT OF SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS . In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8111-38-8, pages 66-73. DOI: 10.5220/0001690600660073


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis08,
author={André Luiz Becker and Jorge Luis Nicolas Audy and Rafael Prikladnicki},
title={AN APPROACH TO SUPPORT THE STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT OF SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2008},
pages={66-73},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001690600660073},
isbn={978-989-8111-38-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - AN APPROACH TO SUPPORT THE STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT OF SOFTWARE PROCESS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS
SN - 978-989-8111-38-8
AU - Luiz Becker A.
AU - Luis Nicolas Audy J.
AU - Prikladnicki R.
PY - 2008
SP - 66
EP - 73
DO - 10.5220/0001690600660073