ADAPTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT IN DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORKS

Floriano Caprio, Rossella Aiello, Giancarlo Nota

Abstract

The risk management in a distributed sensor network charged to put environmental variables under control is receiving great attention in recent years. We propose a framework that considers an high level model together with a distributed system based on adaptive agents able to handle the complete risk lifecycle at various levels of responsibility. The paper first describes the risk modeling problem in a distributed sensor network, then introduces three fundamental agent types: the risk monitoring, the local monitoring and the global monitoring, used to build a network that supports risk management in a distributed environment. Then, the adaptive management of risk exposure is described in terms of a decision process based on a tight cooperation among Local Monitoring Agents. The framework is general enough to be applied in several appication domain.

References

  1. Boehm, B. W. (1991). Software risk management: Principles and practices. IEEE Software, 08(1):32-41.
  2. Camara, M. S., Kermad, L., and Mhamedi, A. E. (2006). Risk prediction in erp projects: Classification of reengineered business processes. In CIMCA 7806: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Inteligence for Modelling Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents Web Technologies and International Commerce, page 213, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society.
  3. Chrysanthakopoulos, G., Fox, W. L. J., Miyamoto, R. T., II, R. J. M., El-Sharkawi, M. A., and Healy, M. (2004). A fuzzy-logic autonomous agent applied as a supervisory controller in a simulated environment. IEEE T. Fuzzy Systems, 12(1):107-122.
  4. COSO (2004). Enterprise risk management - integrated framework.
  5. Culler, D., Estrin, D., and Srivastava, M. (2004). Guest editors' introduction: Overview of sensor networks. Computer, 37(8):41-49.
  6. Grabowski, M., Merrick, J. R. W., Harrald, J. R., Mazzuchi, T. A., and van Dorp, J. R. (2000). Risk modeling in distributed, large-scale systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A, 30(6):651- 660.
  7. Han, W.-M. and Huang, S.-J. (2007). An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(1):42- 50.
  8. He, M., fung Leung, H., and Jennings, N. R. (2003). A fuzzy-logic based bidding strategy for autonomous agents in continuous double auctions. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng., 15(6):1345-1363.
  9. Institute of Risk Management (2002). A Risk Management Standard.
  10. Jennings, N. R. (2001). An agent-based approach for building complex software systems. Commun. ACM, 44(4):35-41.
  11. Kitamura, Y. and Murao, T. (2004). Risk management methods for speculative actions. In AAMAS 7804: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 1250-1251, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society.
  12. Lorenz, M., Gehrke, J. D., Langer, H., Timm, I. J., and Hammer, J. (2005). Situation-aware risk management in autonomous agents. In CIKM 7805: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 363-364, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
  13. Project Management Institute (2004). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) - Third Edition.
  14. Rosenberg, L. H., Hammer, T., and Gallo, A. (1999). Continuous risk management at nasa. In Applied Software Measurement / Software Management Conference, San Jose, California.
  15. Schaller, M. and Vaz, A. (23-25 Mar 1997). Derma: a distributed enterprise risk management architecture. Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr), 1997., Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE 1997, pages 22-28.
  16. Vytelingum, P., Dash, R. K., David, E., and Jennings, N. R. (2004). A risk-based bidding strategy for continuous double auctions. In de Mntaras, R. L. and Saitta, L., editors, European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 79-83. IOS Press.
  17. Wiener, N. (2000). Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in Animal and the Machine. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  18. Williams, R., Walker, J., and Dorofee, A. (1997). Putting risk management into practice. IEEE Softw., 14(3):75-82.
  19. Wooldridge, M. and Jennings, N. (1995). Intelligent Agents: Theory and Practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2):15/152.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Caprio F., Aiello R. and Nota G. (2008). ADAPTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT IN DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORKS . In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 4: CSAC, (ICEIS 2008) ISBN 978-989-8111-39-5, pages 315-320. DOI: 10.5220/0001738703150320


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csac08,
author={Floriano Caprio and Rossella Aiello and Giancarlo Nota},
title={ADAPTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT IN DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORKS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 4: CSAC, (ICEIS 2008)},
year={2008},
pages={315-320},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001738703150320},
isbn={978-989-8111-39-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 4: CSAC, (ICEIS 2008)
TI - ADAPTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT IN DISTRIBUTED SENSOR NETWORKS
SN - 978-989-8111-39-5
AU - Caprio F.
AU - Aiello R.
AU - Nota G.
PY - 2008
SP - 315
EP - 320
DO - 10.5220/0001738703150320