A COMPARATIVE USABILITY EVALUATION OF TWO AUGMENTED REALITY LEARNING SCENARIOS

Alexandru Balog, Costin Pribeanu

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) systems are featuring novel interaction techniques which are mainly driven by the possibilities to manipulate specific real objects. The interaction components have to be tested with users as early as possible in the development cycle in order to avoid usability problems. This paper reports on a comparative analysis of the usability evaluation results for two AR-based learning scenarios. The purpose of the evaluation was twofold: (a) getting an early feedback from users on the first version of the software, and (b) comparing the usability of two learning scenarios developed onto the same AR platform. The comparison has been performed between both quantitative and qualitative measures collected during a summer school.

References

  1. Azuma, R., 1997. A Survey of Augmented Reality. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 355-385.
  2. Bach, C., Scapin, D., 2004. Obstacles and perspectives for Evaluating mixed Reality Eystems Usability. In. Mixer workshop, Proceedings of IUI-CADUI Conference 2004, pp. 72-79. ACM Press.
  3. Bowman, D., Gabbard, J., and Hix, D., 2002. A Survey of Usability Evaluation in Virtual Environments: Classification and Comparison of Methods. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 404-424
  4. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R., 1989. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
  5. Dillon, A. and Morris, M., 1998. From "can they?" to "will they?": extending usability evaluation to address acceptance. AIS Conference, Baltimore, August 1998.
  6. Gabbard, J., Hix, D., Swan, E., Livingston, M., Herer, T., Julier, S., Baillot, Y. & Brown, D., 2004. A CostEffective Usability Evaluation Progression for Novel Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Track 9, p. 90276c, IEEE.
  7. ISO 9126-1:2001 Software Engineering - Software product quality. Part 1: Quality model.
  8. Scriven, M., 1991. Evaluation thesaurus. 4th ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  9. Swann II, J., E., Gabbard, J., 2005. Survey of User-Based Experimentation in Augmented Reality. In. Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Virtual Reality. July 22-27, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2005.
  10. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., Morris, M.G., 2007. Dead Or Alive? The Development, Trajectory And Future Of Technology Adoption Research. Journal of the AIS, Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 267-286.
  11. Wind, J., Riege, K., Bogen M., 2007. Spinnstube®: A Seated Augmented Reality Display System, In Virtual Environments, Proceedings of IPT-EGVE - EG/ACM Symposium, pp. 17-23., Eurographics.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Balog A. and Pribeanu C. (2008). A COMPARATIVE USABILITY EVALUATION OF TWO AUGMENTED REALITY LEARNING SCENARIOS . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing and Multimedia Applications - Volume 1: SIGMAP, (ICETE 2008) ISBN 978-989-8111-60-9, pages 370-375. DOI: 10.5220/0001934003700375


in Bibtex Style

@conference{sigmap08,
author={Alexandru Balog and Costin Pribeanu},
title={A COMPARATIVE USABILITY EVALUATION OF TWO AUGMENTED REALITY LEARNING SCENARIOS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing and Multimedia Applications - Volume 1: SIGMAP, (ICETE 2008)},
year={2008},
pages={370-375},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001934003700375},
isbn={978-989-8111-60-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing and Multimedia Applications - Volume 1: SIGMAP, (ICETE 2008)
TI - A COMPARATIVE USABILITY EVALUATION OF TWO AUGMENTED REALITY LEARNING SCENARIOS
SN - 978-989-8111-60-9
AU - Balog A.
AU - Pribeanu C.
PY - 2008
SP - 370
EP - 375
DO - 10.5220/0001934003700375