VIeTE - Enabling Trust Emergence in Service-oriented Collaborative Environments

Florian Skopik, Hong-Linh Truong, Schahram Dustdar

Abstract

In activity-centric environments where people from different companies and disciplines work remotely together and where new virtual teams are formed and dissolved continuously, how to find the most suitable collaboration partner for a given task and how well one partner is able to collaborate with another one are challenging research questions. Determining and considering people’s professional competencies, collaboration behavior and relationships is a prerequisite to enhance the overall collaboration performance and success, because these factors highly impact on the notion of trust used to select and grade partners. In this paper we analyze these factors and their impact on trust relationships in modern service-oriented collaboration environments. We present VieTE, a framework for trust emergence therein supporting the analysis of trust between partners in various contexts and from different views. In contrast to other approaches, which mostly rely on manual and subjective user feedback, VieTE monitors automatically collaboration efforts and deduces trust between any two partners based on past collaboration, previous successes, and individual competencies.

References

  1. Artz, D. and Gil, Y. (2007). A survey of trust in computer science and the semantic web. J. Web Sem., 5(2):58- 71.
  2. Gomez, V., Kaltenbrunner, A., and Lopez, V. (2008). Statistical analysis of the social network and discussion threads in slashdot. In WWW, pages 645-654. ACM.
  3. Grandison, T. and Sloman, M. (2000). A survey of trust in internet applications. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 3(4).
  4. Guha, R., Kumar, R., Raghavan, P., and Tomkins, A. (2004). Propagation of trust and distrust. In WWW, pages 403-412, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
  5. Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G., and Riedl, J. T. (2004). Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 22(1):5-53.
  6. Huynh, T. D., Jennings, N. R., and Shadbolt, N. R. (2006). An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 13(2):119-154.
  7. Jøsang, A., Ismail, R., and Boyd, C. (2007). A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decision Support Systems, 43(2):618-644.
  8. Marsh, S. P. (1994). Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept. PhD thesis, University of Stirling.
  9. Massa, P. and Avesani, P. (2005). Controversial users demand local trust metrics: An experimental study on epinions.com community. In AAAI, pages 121-126.
  10. Maximilien, E. M. and Singh, M. P. (2004). Toward autonomic web services trust and selection. In ICSOC, pages 212-221. ACM.
  11. McKnight, D. H. and Chervany, N. L. (1996). The meanings of trust. Technical report.
  12. Moody, P., Gruen, D., Muller, M. J., Tang, J. C., and Moran, T. P. (2006). Business activity patterns: A new model for collaborative business applications. IBM Systems Journal, 45(4):683-694.
  13. Mui, L. (2002). Computational models of trust and reputation: Agents, evolutionary games, and social networks. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  14. Quercia, D., Hailes, S., and Capra, L. (2007). Lightweight distributed trust propagation. In ICDM, pages 282- 291. IEEE Computer Society.
  15. Ramchurn, S. D., Jennings, N. R., Sierra, C., and Godo, L. (2004). Devising a trust model for multi-agent interactions using confidence and reputation. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 18(9-10):833-852.
  16. Resnick, P. and Varian, H. R. (1997). Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM, 40(3):56-58.
  17. Ruohomaa, S. and Kutvonen, L. (2005). Trust management survey. In iTrust, volume 3477 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 77-92. Springer.
  18. Schall, D., Truong, H.-L., and Dustdar, S. (2008). Unifying human and software services in web-scale collaborations. IEEE Internet Computing, 12(3):62-68.
  19. Shand, B., Dimmock, N., and Bacon, J. (2004). Trust for ubiquitous, transparent collaboration. Wireless Networks, 10(6):711-721.
  20. Theodorakopoulos, G. and Baras, J. S. (2006). On trust models and trust evaluation metrics for ad hoc networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 24(2):318-328.
  21. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Skopik F., Truong H. and Dustdar S. (2009). VIeTE - Enabling Trust Emergence in Service-oriented Collaborative Environments . In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST, ISBN 978-989-8111-81-4, pages 471-478. DOI: 10.5220/0001820904710478


in Bibtex Style

@conference{webist09,
author={Florian Skopik and Hong-Linh Truong and Schahram Dustdar},
title={VIeTE - Enabling Trust Emergence in Service-oriented Collaborative Environments},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,},
year={2009},
pages={471-478},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001820904710478},
isbn={978-989-8111-81-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,
TI - VIeTE - Enabling Trust Emergence in Service-oriented Collaborative Environments
SN - 978-989-8111-81-4
AU - Skopik F.
AU - Truong H.
AU - Dustdar S.
PY - 2009
SP - 471
EP - 478
DO - 10.5220/0001820904710478