SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE DISCUSSIONS - Participation in a Group Audio Conferencing and Textual Chat as Affected by Communicator's Personality Characteristics and Discussion Topics

Ina Blau, Azy Barak

Abstract

The development of instructional technology increases the use of synchronous e-learning procedures which enable real-time interactions. The study explores whether the willingness to participate as well as actual participation in synchronous group discussions is affected by participant personality (extroversion-introversion), medium characteristics and discussion topic sensitivity. The research is composed of two sequenced sub-studies. The first one investigates the willingness to participate while the second study explores the degree of actual participation in discussions. An online self-report questionnaire was completed by 405 adult Internet users. Following that, 120 volunteers extracted from this sample were randomly assigned to face-to-face, audio conferencing, or textual chat gender-mixed experimental conditions and conducted two short discussions (having low and high degrees of topic sensitivity). The relation between estimated and actual participation was explored, as well as the equalization effect of online interactions. The first study findings show that, in general, participants prefer conventional over sensitive discussion topic; they also prefer face-to-face discussion rather than online communication. As hypothesized, participant personality affects the willingness to partake in discussions: extroverts prefer taking part via a more revealing communication medium; introverts express greater readiness for discussion via textual chat. The results of the study expand the understanding of student behaviour in synchronous e-learning.

References

  1. Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2005). Personality and the Internet. In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.), The social net: Human behaviour in cyberspace (pp. 27-55). New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (2007). Personality, individual differences and Internet use. In A. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U. D. Reips (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 187-204). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  3. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Ben-Artzi, E. (2000). The relationship between extraversion, neuroticism, and the internet. Computer and Human Behaviour, 16, 441-449.
  4. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). “On the Internet no one knows I'm an introvert”: Extroversion, neuroticism, and Internet interaction. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 5, 125-128.
  5. Anolli, L., Villani, D., & Riva, G. (2005). Personality of people using chat: An on-line research. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 8, 89-95.
  6. Barak, A. (2007). Phantom emotions: Psychological determinants of emotional experiences on the Internet. In A. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U. D. Reips (Eds.), Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 303-329). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  7. Blau, I., & Caspi, A. (2007). Participation in and efficiency of distance learning using Skype™. In M. Ronen (Ed). Online Academic Learning (pp.75-77). Holon: Holon Institute of Technology. [in Hebrew]
  8. Blau, I., & Caspi, A. (2008). Do media richness and visual anonymity influence learning? A comparative study using Skype™. In Y. Eshet, A. Caspi, & N. Geri (Eds.) Learning in the Technological Era (pp. 18-25). Ra'anana, Israel: The Open University of Israel.
  9. Berge, O., & Fjuk, A. (2006). Understanding the multiple roles of online meetings in a net-based course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 13-23.
  10. Caspi, A., & Levin, T. (2008). Students' media choice: Media richness, social influence, or experience? In Y. Eshet, A. Caspi, & N. Geri (Eds.) Learning in the Technological Era (pp.94-10). Ra'anana, Israel: The Open University of Israel. [in Hebrew]
  11. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  12. Daft, R. L., & Lengel. R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behaviour and organization design. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (Vol. 6, pp. 191-233). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
  13. Donabedian, B. (2006). Optimization and its alternative in media choice: A model of reliance on social-influence processes. Information Society, 22, 121-135.
  14. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. E. G. (1975). Manual: Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
  15. Hertel, G., Schroer, J., Batinic, B., & Naumann, S. (2008). Do shy people prefer to send e-mail? Personality effects on communication media preferences in threatening and non- threatening situations. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved October 18, 2008, from: http://www.abo.psychologie.uniwuerzburg.de/virtualcollaboration/publications.php?ac tion=view&id=22
  16. Hudson, J. M., & Bruckman, A. (2002). IRC Français: The creation of an internet-based SLA community. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 109-134.
  17. Joinson, A. N. (2003). Understanding the psychology of Internet behaviour. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  18. Joinson, A. N. (2007). Disinhibition and the Internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal and transpersonal implications (2nd ed.) (pp. 76-92). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
  19. Maldonado, G. J., Mora, M., Garcia, S., & Edipo, P. (2001). Personality, sex and computer communication mediated through the Internet. Anuario de Psicologia 32, 51-62.
  20. McKenna, K.Y.A., Green, A.S., & Gleason, M.J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 9-32.
  21. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Seidman, G. (2005). You, me, and we: Interpersonal processes in online groups. In Y. A. Hamburger (Ed.), The social net: The social psychology of the Internet (pp. 191-217). New York: Oxford University Press.
  22. McKenna, K. Y. A., Seidman, G., Buffardi, A., & Green, A. S. (2007). Ameliorating social anxiety through online interaction. Manuscript under review. BenGurion University.
  23. Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J.N., Helgeson,V., & Crawford, A.M. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 49-74.
  24. Ng, K. C. (2007). Replacing face-to-face tutorials by synchronous online technologies: Challenges and pedagogical implications. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 8, 1-15.
  25. O'Sullivan, P. B., Hunt, S. K., & Lippert, L. R. (2004). Mediated immediacy: A language of affiliation in a technological age. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 464-490.
  26. Peris, R., Gimeno, M. A., Pinazo, D., Ortet, G., Carrero, V., Sanchiz, M., & Ibáñez, I. (2002). On-line chat rooms: Virtual spaces of interaction for socially oriented people. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 5, 43-51.
  27. Pickett, J. M. (1998). The acoustics of speech communication: Fundamentals, speech perception theory and technology, (2nd ed). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
  28. Riva, G., Teruzzi, T., & Anolli, L. (2003). The use of the Internet in psychological research: comparison of online and offline questionnaires. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 6, 73-80.
  29. Setlock, L. D., Quinones, P., & Fussell, S. R. (2007, January). Does culture interact with Media Richness? The effects of audio vs. video conferencing on Chinese and American dyads. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii international Conference on System Sciences, p.13. HICSS, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.
  30. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 7, 321-326.
  31. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
  32. Walther, J. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23, 2538-2557.
  33. Walther, J. B., Loh, T., & Granka, L. (2005). Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 36- 65.
  34. Wang, Y. (2006). Negotiation of meaning in desktop videocongerencing-supported distance language learning. ReCALL, 18, 122-146.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Blau I. and Barak A. (2009). SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE DISCUSSIONS - Participation in a Group Audio Conferencing and Textual Chat as Affected by Communicator's Personality Characteristics and Discussion Topics . In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-8111-82-1, pages 18-23. DOI: 10.5220/0001848900180023


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu09,
author={Ina Blau and Azy Barak},
title={SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE DISCUSSIONS - Participation in a Group Audio Conferencing and Textual Chat as Affected by Communicator's Personality Characteristics and Discussion Topics},
booktitle={Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2009},
pages={18-23},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001848900180023},
isbn={978-989-8111-82-1},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - SYNCHRONOUS ONLINE DISCUSSIONS - Participation in a Group Audio Conferencing and Textual Chat as Affected by Communicator's Personality Characteristics and Discussion Topics
SN - 978-989-8111-82-1
AU - Blau I.
AU - Barak A.
PY - 2009
SP - 18
EP - 23
DO - 10.5220/0001848900180023