N. R. T. P. van Beest, N. B. Szirbik, J. C. Wortmann


Current model-driven techniques claim to be able to generate Enterprise Information Systems (EISs) based on enterprise models. However, these techniques still lack – after the initial deployment – the long-time desired flexibility, which allows that a change in the model can be immediately and easily reflected in the EIS. Interdependencies between models are insufficiently managed, requiring a large amount of human intervention to achieve and maintain consistency between models and the EIS. In this position paper a vision is presented, which describes how model-driven change of EISs should be structured in a coherent framework that allows for monitoring of interdependencies during model-driven change. Therefore, proposing fully automated consistency and pattern checks, the presented agile model-driven framework will reduce the amount of required human interventions during change. As a result, the cost and time span of model-driven EIS change can be reduced, thereby improving organizational agility.


  1. Van der Aalst., W.M.P., 2001. Exterminating the Dynamic Change Bug: A Concrete Approach to Support Workflow Change. Information Systems Frontiers, 3, 3, pp. 297-317.
  2. Van der Aalst, W.M.P., Van Hee, K.M., 2002. Workflow Management: Models, Methods and Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  3. Ami, T., Sommer, R., 2007. Comparison and evaluation of business process modelling and management tools. Int. J. of Services and Standards, 3, 2, pp. 249-261.
  4. Atkinson, C., Kühne, T, 2003. Aspect-Oriented Development with Stratified Frameworks. IEEE Software, 20, 1, pp. 81-89.
  5. Botta-Genoulaz, V., Millet, P.A., Grabot, B., 2005. A survey on the recent research literature on ERP systems. Computers in Industry, 56, 6, pp. 510-22.
  6. Cardoso, J., Bostrom, R.P., Seth, A., 2004. Workflow Management Systems and ERP Systems: Differences, Commonalities, and Applications. Information Technology and Management, 5, pp. 319-338.
  7. Ceri, S., Grefen, P., Sanchez, G., 1997. WIDE - a distributed architecture for workflow management. In RIDE 7897, 7th Int. Workshop on Research Issues in Data Engineering, High Performance Database Management for Large-Scale Applications, pp. 76.
  8. France, R.B., Ghosh, S., Dinh-Trong, T., Solberg, A., 2006. Model-Driven Development Using UML 2.0: Promises and Pitfalls. Computer, 39, 2, pp. 59-66.
  9. Garcés, K., Jouault, F., Cointe, P., Bézivin, J., 2008. Adaptation of Models to Evolving Metamodels. Technical Report, Institut National De Recherche En Informatique Et En Automatique, ISSN 0249-0803.
  10. Hailpern, B., Tarr, P., 2006. Model-driven development: The good, the bad, and the ugly. IBM Systems J., 45, 3, pp. 451-461.
  11. Hearnden, D., Lawley, M., Kerry, R. 2006. Incremental Model Transformation for the Evolution of ModelDriven Systems. In MoDELS 2006 Proc. of the 9th International Conference, 4199/2006, pp. 321-335.
  12. Kleppe, G., Warmer, J., Bast, W., 2003. MDA Explained: The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley,
  13. Meijler, T.D., Postmus, D., Wortmann, J.C., 2006. Towards Model-driven Evolvability of Enterprise Information Systems. In 10th IEEE Int. Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC'06), pp.413-416.
  14. Olson, D.L., 2004. Managerial issues of enterprise resource planning systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  15. OMG, 2003. MDA Guide Version 1.0.1. www.omg.org.
  16. Rayhupathi W., Umar A., 2008. Exploring a model-driven architecture (MDA) approach to health care information systems development. Int. J. of Medical Informatics, 77, 5, pp. 305-314.
  17. Reijers, H.A., 2006. Workflow Flexibility: The Forlorn Promise. In WETICE'06, 15th IEEE Int. Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pp. 271-272.
  18. Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Mulyar., N., 2006. Workflow Control-Flow Patterns: A Revised View. BPM Center Report BPM-06-22, BPMcenter.org.
  19. Stohr, E. A., Zao, J. L., 2001. Workflow Automation: Overview and Research Issues. Information Systems Frontiers, 3, 3, pp. 281-296.
  20. Szirbik, N.B., Wortmann, J.C., 2004. Bridging The Gap Between ERP And WfM In Planning Using Agents. In Proc. of the Int. IMS Forum, Cernobbio Italy, pp. 317- 324.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

van Beest N., Szirbik N. and Wortmann J. (2009). A VISION FOR AGILE MODEL-DRIVEN ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS . In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8111-86-9, pages 188-193. DOI: 10.5220/0002001201880193

in Bibtex Style

author={N. R. T. P. van Beest and N. B. Szirbik and J. C. Wortmann},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
SN - 978-989-8111-86-9
AU - van Beest N.
AU - Szirbik N.
AU - Wortmann J.
PY - 2009
SP - 188
EP - 193
DO - 10.5220/0002001201880193