THE IMPACT OF INTERFACE ASPECTS ON INTERACTIVE MAP COMMUNICATION - An Evaluation Methodology

Lucia Peixe Maziero, Cláudia Robbi Sluter, Laura Sanchèz Garcia

Abstract

In this paper, we will present an analytical and methodological procedure to evaluate the interfaces of Inter-active Maps. The main aims of one such evaluation is to (i) identify the essential aspects of these interfaces, (ii) investigate their influence on the communication with users and, based on this, (iii) set directives to guide the design of interfaces of future Interactive Maps. The process of evaluation leads to a detailed analysis of both the interface and the interaction itself. In order to do so, the process consists of the analysis of the essential elements of the interfaces, the evaluation of these aspects in relation to the users and, finally, the study of the results obtained. The results mainly refer to significant information on those aspects of the interfaces which, in turn, concern the necessary resources to both the interaction itself and the functionalities that Interactive Maps provide.

References

  1. Andrienko, N., Andrienko, G., Voss, H., Bernardo, F., Hipólito, J., Kretchmer, U., 2002. Testing the usability of interactive maps in CommonGIS. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, v.29, i.4, p.325.
  2. Dent, B. D.,1999. Cartography thematic map design. EUA, ed. McGraw-Hill.
  3. DiBiase, D., 1990, Visualization in the earth sciences. Earth and Mineral Sciences. Bulletin of de College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, PSU 59(2): p. 13-18.
  4. Harder, C., 1989. Serving Maps on the Internet: geographic information on the world wide Web. Redlands, California, Environmental Systems Research Institute, INC.
  5. Hornbaek K., Bederson B. B., Plaisant C., 2002. Navigation Patterns and Usability of Zoomable User Interfaces with and without an Overview. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, Vol. 9, No. 4, December, Pages 362-389.
  6. Kraak, M. J., 2000. Visualizing spatial distributions. In Longley, P., Goodchild, M., Maguire, D. M., Rhind D. (Ed). Geographical Information Systems: Principles, Techniques, Management, and Applications. Cambridge: Geoinformation International, cap 11.
  7. Koua E. L., 2005. Computational and visual support for exploratory geovisualization and knowledge construction. The Netherlands, Thesis (PhD) Faculty of Geographical Sciences Utrecht University P.O.
  8. Koua E. L., MacEachren A., Kraak M. J., 2006. Evaluating the usability of visualization methods in an exploratory geovisualization environment. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. v. 20, n. 4, April, p.425-448.
  9. MacEachren, A., 1995. How maps works: representation, visualization, and design. New York. Guilford Press, 513 p.
  10. MacEachren, A., 1998. Design and evaluation of a computerized mapping system interface. Pennsylvania State University.
  11. Maceachren, A.; Kraak, M. J. Research challenges in geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science. v.28 No 1, p.3-12. 2001.
  12. Marr, D., 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco. W. H. Freeman.
  13. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., 2002. Interaction Design: Beyond Human- Computer Interaction. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Robbi, C. 2000. Sistema para visualização de informações cartográficas para planejamento urbano. São José dos Campos, 369 p. Tese (Doutorado em Computação Aplicada) - INPE / Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia.
  15. Robinson, A. H, Morrison, J. L., Muehrcke, P. C. , Kimerling, A. J., Guptill, S. C., 1995. Elements of cartography. New York. ed. Wiley. 6th ed.
  16. Slocum, T. A., 1999. Thematic cartography and visualization. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 293 p.
  17. Slocum, T. A., Blok, C., Jiang, B., Koussoulakou, A., Montello, D. R., Fuhrmann, S., Hedley , N. R., 2001. Cognitive and Usability Issues in Geovisualization: a research agenda. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28, p. 61-76.
  18. Stevenson, J., Cartwright, W., 2000. A toolbox for publishing maps on the world wide web. Cartography (Brisbane), v.29, n.2, p.83-95, Dec.
  19. Sternberg, R. J., 1996. Cognitive Psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Wiston.
  20. Stephen E., 1994. The design and evaluation of an interactive choropleth map exploration system. USA. Thesis (PhD) Department of Geography. University of Kansas. 129 p.
  21. Zhu B., Chen H., 2005. Using 3D interfaces to facility the spatial knowledge retrieval: a geo-referenced knowledge repository system. In: Decision Support Systems 40. p. 167 182.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Peixe Maziero L., Robbi Sluter C. and Garcia L. (2009). THE IMPACT OF INTERFACE ASPECTS ON INTERACTIVE MAP COMMUNICATION - An Evaluation Methodology . In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8111-88-3, pages 105-112. DOI: 10.5220/0002004601050112


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis09,
author={Lucia Peixe Maziero and Cláudia Robbi Sluter and Laura Sanchèz Garcia},
title={THE IMPACT OF INTERFACE ASPECTS ON INTERACTIVE MAP COMMUNICATION - An Evaluation Methodology},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS,},
year={2009},
pages={105-112},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002004601050112},
isbn={978-989-8111-88-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 5: ICEIS,
TI - THE IMPACT OF INTERFACE ASPECTS ON INTERACTIVE MAP COMMUNICATION - An Evaluation Methodology
SN - 978-989-8111-88-3
AU - Peixe Maziero L.
AU - Robbi Sluter C.
AU - Garcia L.
PY - 2009
SP - 105
EP - 112
DO - 10.5220/0002004601050112