COGNITIVE OBJECT FORMAT

H. Castro, A. P. Alves

Abstract

The amount of on-line information content is growing without apparent limits. The lack of a coherent and consistent structure for its expression leads to increasing problems in terms of desired information retrieval and rendering. Multiple initiatives have been undertaken to bring forth such a global coherence. Nonetheless, it is still unattained. The informational landscape is highly fragmented in terms of the formats of the information object (IO) and their semantic interconnection, which is still incipient. This work exploits a loose and common sense based analogy between the Internet and the brain for the development of a new and versatile, MPEG 21 based data structuring format (termed Cognitive Object Format), for the description of information objects, equating them to cerebral memories. The objective is to enable an easier and more pervasive human (machine aided) or automatic interpretation and access to IO and their meanings in order to contribute to the development of a coherent base for their declaration and structuring.

References

  1. DARPA Home Page, http://www.darpa.mil, retrieved 05/03/2009.
  2. Sanes, D. H., Reh, T. A., Harris, W. A., 2006. “Development of the Nervous System”. Elsevier Academic Press.
  3. FidoNet Official Web Site, http://www.fidonet.org/, retrieved 05/03/2009.
  4. O'Regan, G., 2008. “A Brief History of Computing”. Springer.
  5. ITU-T's page on X.25, http://www.itu.int/rec/T-RECX.25-199610-I/en, retrieved 05/03/2009.
  6. Mosaic Web Browser's page at NCSA, http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Projects/mosaic.html, retrieved 05/03/2009.
  7. MPEG-7 Web Page at Leonardo Chiariglione's Web Site, “MPEG-7 Overview”, http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/standards/mpeg7/mpeg-7.htm, 2004, retrieved 08/03/2009.
  8. MPEG-21, 2005. “ISO/IEC FDIS 21000-2:2005(E) MPEG-21 - Part 2: Digital Item Declaration”.
  9. MPEG-21, 2005. “ISO/IEC FDIS 21000-3:2005(E) MPEG-21 - Part 3: Digital Item Identification”.
  10. MPEG-21, 2006, “ISO/IEC FDIS 21000-5:2006(E) MPEG-21 - Part 5: Rights Expression Language”.
  11. MPEG-21, 2006. “ISO/IEC FDIS 21000-15:2006(E) MPEG-21 - Part 15: Event Reporting”.
  12. MPEG-21, 2006. “ISO/IEC FDIS 21000-17:2006(E) MPEG-21 - Part 17: Fragment Identification of MPEG Resources”.
  13. MPEG-21 Web Page at Leonardo Chiariglione's Web Site, “MPEG-21 Overview v.5”, http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/standards/mpeg21/mpeg-21.htm, 2002, retrieved 08/03/2009.
  14. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O., 2001. “The semantic web: A new form of web that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities”. Scientific American.
  15. UUCP Project Web Site, http://www.uucp.org/info.shtml, retrieved 05/03/2009.
  16. W3C's OWL specification, http://www.w3.org/TR/owlfeatures.
  17. W3C's RDF specification, http://www.w3.org/RDF.
  18. Athanasiadis, T., Tzouvaras, V., Petridis, K., Precioso, F., Avrithis, Y. and Kompatsiaris, Y., 2005. “Using a Multimedia Ontology Infrastructure for Semantic Annotation of Multimedia Content”. Proc. of 5th International Workshop on Knowledge Markup and Semantic Annotation.
  19. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., and Schneider, L., 2002. “Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE”. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management.
  20. García, R., Tsinaraki, C., Celma, O., Christodoulakis, S., 2008. "Multimedia Content Description using Semantic Web Languages". In Y. Kompatsiaris, P. Hobson, (Eds.) Semantic Multimedia and Ontologies: Theory and Applications, pp. 17-54. Springer.
  21. Bloehdorn, S., Petridis, K., Saathoff, C., Simou, N., Tzouvaras, V., Avrithis, Y., Handschuh, S., Kompatsiaris, I., Staab, S., and Strintzis, M., 2005. “Semantic annotation of images and videos for multimedia analysis”. Proc. of European Semantic Web Conference.
  22. Vembu, S., Kiesel, M., Sintek, M., and Bauman, S., 2006. "Towards bridging the semantic gap in multimedia annotation and retrieval". Proc. of First International Workshop on Semantic Web Annotations for Multimedia.
  23. Stamou, G., Ossenbruggen, J., Pan, J. Z., Schreiber, G., 2006. ”Multimedia Annotations on the Semantic Web”. IEEE MultiMedia, v.13 n.1, p.86-90.
  24. Arndt, R., Troncy, R., Staab, S., Hardman, L., and Vacura, M., 2007. “COMM: Designing a Well-Founded Multimedia Ontology for the Web”. In 6th International Semantic Web Conference.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Castro H. and P. Alves A. (2009). COGNITIVE OBJECT FORMAT . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2009) ISBN 978-989-674-012-2, pages 351-358. DOI: 10.5220/0002263103510358


in Bibtex Style

@conference{keod09,
author={H. Castro and A. P. Alves},
title={COGNITIVE OBJECT FORMAT},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2009)},
year={2009},
pages={351-358},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002263103510358},
isbn={978-989-674-012-2},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2009)
TI - COGNITIVE OBJECT FORMAT
SN - 978-989-674-012-2
AU - Castro H.
AU - P. Alves A.
PY - 2009
SP - 351
EP - 358
DO - 10.5220/0002263103510358