INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL IN AN IMAGING EXAMINATION WORKFLOW

Chung-Yueh Lien, Chia-Hung Hsiao, Tsung-Lung Yang, Tsair Kao

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluated the implementation of a digital signature for medical imaging quality assurance and control (QA/C) by a technician in accordance with the Digital Image and Communication in Medicine (DICOM). After QA/C, a set of DICOM images were collected into a DICOM Key Object Selection (KOS) document with digital signatures. The digital signature was implemented by RSA public-key cryptography combined with a public-key health certificate and health professional card (HPC) to digitally sign a series of DICOM images. Our method includes the DICOM Modality Performed Procedure Steps (MPPS) mechanism that assures the image transmission completeness and accuracy in an image examination workflow. The results show that the method is more efficient and requires less loading time to create the technician’s signature in an imaging examination workflow.

References

  1. ACM-NEMA, 2009. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine [online]. Available from: http://medical.nema.org/dicom/ [Accessed 11 July 2009].
  2. Brandner, R., M. Van der Haak, et al., 2002. Electronic signature for medical documents - Integration and evaluation of a public key infrastructure in hospitals. Methods of Information in Medicine 41(4), 321-330.
  3. Cao, F., H. K. Huang, et al., 2003. Medical image security in a HIPAA mandated PACS environment. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 27(2-3): 185-196.
  4. Kobayashi, L., Furuie S., et al., 2009. Providing Integrity and Authenticity in DICOM Images: a Novel Approach. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 13(4), 582-589.
  5. Lepanto, L., 2003. Impact of Electronic Signature on Radiology Report Turnaround Time. Journal of Digital Imaging 16(3), 306-309.
  6. Moore, S. M., 2003. Using the IHE Scheduled Work Flow Integration Profile to Drive Modality Efficiency. Radiographics 23(2), 523-529.
  7. Noumeir, R., 2005. Benefits of the DICOM Modality Performed Procedure Step. Journal of Digital Imaging 18(4), 260-269.
  8. Schüze, B., Kroll, M., et al., 2004. Patient data security in the DICOM standard. European Journal of Radiology 51(3), 286-289.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Lien C., Hsiao C., Yang T. and Kao T. (2010). INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL IN AN IMAGING EXAMINATION WORKFLOW . In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Health Informatics - Volume 1: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2010) ISBN 978-989-674-016-0, pages 155-158. DOI: 10.5220/0002689501550158


in Bibtex Style

@conference{healthinf10,
author={Chung-Yueh Lien and Chia-Hung Hsiao and Tsung-Lung Yang and Tsair Kao},
title={INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL IN AN IMAGING EXAMINATION WORKFLOW},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Health Informatics - Volume 1: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2010)},
year={2010},
pages={155-158},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002689501550158},
isbn={978-989-674-016-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Health Informatics - Volume 1: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2010)
TI - INTEGRITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL IN AN IMAGING EXAMINATION WORKFLOW
SN - 978-989-674-016-0
AU - Lien C.
AU - Hsiao C.
AU - Yang T.
AU - Kao T.
PY - 2010
SP - 155
EP - 158
DO - 10.5220/0002689501550158