Won Moon, Joong-Ho Lee, Ji-Hyung Park


There exists a multitude of different platforms for educational games. As technology continues to mature, various new devices will arise, some of which may yield substantial benefits for such educational applications. In this paper, we discuss the potential effectiveness of one particular device for educational games, interactive tabletops. We introduce what we believe are the key reasons why interactive tabletops are appropriate for this domain. In addition, we present two of the games we have developed for evaluating our claims. Although we have not yet conducted a complete user evaluation, we will provide some of our impressions from preliminary trials.


  1. Abednego, M., Lee, J., Moon, W., and Park, J. (2009). Igrabber: Expanding physical reach in a large-display tabletop environment through the use of a virtual grabber. In Proceedings of ITS 2009, pages 67-70. ACM Press.
  2. Bonwell, C. and Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Technical report, George Washington University. ASHEERIC Higher Education Report No. 1.
  3. Cordova, D. and Lepper, M. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4):715-730.
  4. Dietz, P. and Leigh, D. (2001). Diamondtouch: A multiuser touch technology. In Proceedings of UIST 2001, pages 219-226. ACM Press.
  5. Forlines, C., Wigdor, D., Shen, C., and Balakrishnan, R. (2007). Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 647-656. ACM Press.
  6. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., and Driskell, J. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation and Gaming, 33(4):441-467.
  7. Han, J. (2005). Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection. In Proceedings of UIST 2005, pages 115-118. ACM Press.
  8. Inkpen, K., Ho-Ching, W., Kuederle, O., Scott, S., and Shoemaker, G. (1999). This is fun! were all best friends and were all playing: supporting childrens synchronous collaboration. In Proceedings of the 1999 conference on computer support for collaborative learning. International Society of the Learning Science.
  9. Jeong, H. and Chi, M. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 35(4):287-315.
  10. Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., and Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2):153-162.
  11. Khandelwal, M. and Mazalek, A. (2007). Teaching table: a tangible mentor for pre-k math education. In Processings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction, pages 191-194. ACM Press.
  12. Morris, M., Piper, A., Cassanego, A., and Winograd, T. (2005). Supporting cooperative language learning: Issues in interface design for an interactive table. Technical report, Stanford University.
  13. Piper, A., O'Brien, E., Morris, M., and Winograd, T. (2006). Sides: a cooperative tabletop computer game for social skills development. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work, pages 1-10. ACM Press.
  14. Price, S. and Rogers, Y. (2004). Lets get physical: The learning benefits of interacting in digitally augmented physical spaces. Computers and Education, 43(1- 2):137-151.
  15. Rick, J. and Rogers, Y. (2008). From digiquilt to digitile: Adapting educational technology to a multi-touch table. In Proceedings of TABLETOP 2008, pages 73-80. IEEE Press.
  16. Rogers, Y. and Lindley, S. (2006). Collaborating around large interactive displays: Which way is best to meet. In Proceedings of CHI 2006, pages 1201-1210. ACM Press.
  17. Schwartzman, R. (1997). Gaming serves as a model for improving learning. Education, 118(1):9-18.
  18. Sluis, R., Weevers, I., Schijndel, C., Kolos-Mazuryk, L., Fitrianie, S., and Martens, J. (2004). Read-it: five-toseven-year-old children learn to read in a tabletop environment. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on interaction design and children, pages 73-80. ACM Press.
  19. Smith, A. and Sherwood, B. (1976). Educational uses of the plato computer system. Science, 192:334-352.
  20. Stewart, J., Bederson, B., and Druin, A. (1999). Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 286-293. ACM Press.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Moon W., Lee J. and Park J. (2010). UTILIZING INTERACTIVE TABLETOPS FOR EDUCATIONAL GAMES . In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: GPERP, (CSEDU 2010) ISBN 978-989-674-024-5, pages 478-483. DOI: 10.5220/0002858204780483

in Bibtex Style

author={Won Moon and Joong-Ho Lee and Ji-Hyung Park},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: GPERP, (CSEDU 2010)},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: GPERP, (CSEDU 2010)
SN - 978-989-674-024-5
AU - Moon W.
AU - Lee J.
AU - Park J.
PY - 2010
SP - 478
EP - 483
DO - 10.5220/0002858204780483