A METHOD FOR PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AND PRIORITIZATION - An Incremental Funding Method Approach

Gustavo Taveira, Antonio Juarez Alencar, Eber Assis Schmitz

Abstract

In today’s very competitive business environment, making the best possible use of limited resources is crucial to achieve success and gain competitive advantage. To accomplish such a goal organizations have to maximize the return provided by their portfolio of future investments, choosing very carefully the IT projects they undertake and the risks they are willing to accept, otherwise they are bound to waste time and money, and still be likely to fail. This article introduces a method that enables managers to better evaluate the investment to be made in a portfolio of IT projects. The method favors the identification of common parts, avoiding the duplication of work efforts, and the selection of the implementation order that yields the highest payoff considering a given risk exposure policy. Moreover, it extends Denne and Cleland-Huang’s ideas on minimum marketable feature modules and uses both Decision Theory and the Principles of Choice to guide the decisions made under uncertainty.

References

  1. Abdellaoui, M. and Hey, J. D. (2008). Advances in Decision Making Under Risk and Uncertainty. Springer, New York, NY, USA.
  2. Alencar, A. J., Schmitz, E. A., and de Abreu, E. P. (2008). Maximizing the business value of software projects: A branch & bound approach. In 10th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, volume ISAS-2, pages 162-169, Barcelona, Spain. Institute for Systems and Technologies of Information, Control and Communication.
  3. Barbosa, B. P., Schmitz, E. A., and Alencar, A. J. (2008). The case for managerial flexibility in mmf-based software development projects. In Workshop on Business-driven IT Management, 2008. BDIM 2008. 3rd IEEE/IFIP International, pages 114-115, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. IEEE.
  4. Biehl, M. (2007). Success factors for implementing global information systems. Commun. ACM, 50(1):52-58.
  5. Bingi, P., Sharma, M. K., and Godla, J. K. (1999). Critical issues affecting an erp implementation. Information System Management, 16(3):7-14.
  6. Chang, C. K., Cleland-Haung, J., Hua, S., and KuntzmannCombelles, A. (2001). Function-class decomposition: A hybrid software engineering method. Computer, 34:87-93.
  7. Chen, I. L. (2001). Planning for erp systems: analysis and future trend. Business Process Management Journal, 7(5):374-386.
  8. Chen, T., Zhang, J., Huang, W. W., and Zeng, Y. (2007). Evaluating information technology investment under multiple sources of risks. In the Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, pages 6111-6114, White Plains, NY, USA. IEEE Press.
  9. Denne, M. and Cleland-Huang, J. (2003). Software by Numbers: Low-Risk, High-Return Development. Prentice Hall.
  10. Denne, M. and Cleland-Huang, J. (2004). The incremental funding method: Data-driven software development. IEEE Software, 21(3):39-47.
  11. Denne, M. and Cleland-Huang, J. (2005). Financially informed requirements prioritization. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Software Engineering, pages 710-711, St Louis, Missouri, USA. ACM New York, NY, USA.
  12. Holloway, C. A. (1979). Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Models and Choices. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  13. Hubbard, D. W. (2007). How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of ”Intangibles” in Business. John Willey & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
  14. Jeffery, M. and Leliveld, I. (2004). Best practices in it portfolio management. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(3):41-49.
  15. Kotz, S. and van Dorp, J. R. (2004). Beyond Beta: Other Continuous Families Of Distributions With Bounded Support And Applications. World Scientific Publishing Co., Hackensack, NJ.
  16. Lang, H. J. and Merino, D. N. (1993). The selection process for capital projects. Wiley-Interscience.
  17. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio slection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1):77-91.
  18. McFarlan, F. W. (1981). Portfolio approach to information systems. Harvard Business Review, pages 142-151.
  19. Pressman, R. S. (2009). Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach. MacGraw-Hill, 7th edition.
  20. Reyck, B. D., Grushka-Cockayne, Y., Lockett, M., Calderini, S. R., Moura, M., and Sloper, A. (2005). The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(5):534-537.
  21. Robert, C. P. and Casella, G. (2005). Monte Carlo Statistical Methods. Springer.
  22. S. Dewan, C. Shi, V. G. (2007). Investigating the riskreturn relationship of information technology investment: Firm-level empirical analysis. Management Science, 53(12):1829-1842.
  23. Schmitz, E. A., Alencar, A. J., and de Azevedo, C. M. (2008). A method for defining the implementation order of software projects under uncertainty. In SAC 7808: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM symposium on Applied computing, pages 844-845, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil. ACM.
  24. Schniederjans, M. J., Hamaker, J. L., and Schniederjans, A. M. (2004). Information Technology Investment: Decision-Making Methodology, volume 1. World Scientific Publishing Co., River Edge, NJ.
  25. Silvius, A. J. G. (2008). The business value of it a conceptual model for selecting valuation method. Communications of the IIMA, 8(3):57-66.
  26. Somers, T. M. and Nelson, K. G. (2003). The impact of strategy and integration mechanisms on enterprise system value: empirical evidence from manufacturing firms. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(2):315-338.
  27. Westerman, G. and Hunter, R. (2007). IT Risk: turning business threats into competitive advantages. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, USA.
  28. White, D. J. (2006). Decision Theory. Aldine Transaction.
  29. Whittaker, B. (1999). What went wrong? unsuccessful information technology projects. Information Management & Computer Security, 7(1):23-30.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Taveira G., Juarez Alencar A. and Assis Schmitz E. (2010). A METHOD FOR PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AND PRIORITIZATION - An Incremental Funding Method Approach . In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8425-06-5, pages 23-33. DOI: 10.5220/0002873400230033


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis10,
author={Gustavo Taveira and Antonio Juarez Alencar and Eber Assis Schmitz},
title={A METHOD FOR PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AND PRIORITIZATION - An Incremental Funding Method Approach},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2010},
pages={23-33},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002873400230033},
isbn={978-989-8425-06-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - A METHOD FOR PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AND PRIORITIZATION - An Incremental Funding Method Approach
SN - 978-989-8425-06-5
AU - Taveira G.
AU - Juarez Alencar A.
AU - Assis Schmitz E.
PY - 2010
SP - 23
EP - 33
DO - 10.5220/0002873400230033