A GENERIC METRIC FOR MEASURING COMPLEXITY OF MODELS

Christian Schalles, John Creagh, Michael Rebstock

Abstract

In recent years, various object and process oriented modelling methods were developed to support the process of modelling in enterprises. When applying these methods, graphical models are generated and used to depict various aspects of enterprise architectures. Concerning this, surveys analyzing modelling languages in different ways were conducted. In many cases these surveys include experimental data collection methods. At this juncture the complexity of concrete models often affects output of these studies. To ensure complexity value comparability of different models, a generic metric for measuring complexity of models is proposed.

References

  1. Halstead, M. H. 1977. Elements of Software Science (Operating and programming systems series). New York: Elsevier Science Inc.
  2. Henry, S. and D. Kafura. 1981. "Software structure metrics based on information flow." IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 7(5):510-518.
  3. Mc Cabe, T. J. 1976. "A Complexity Measure." IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2(4):308-320.
  4. Mendling, J. and M. Strembeck. 2008. "Influence Factors of Understanding Business Process Models." Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Business Information Systems 7(1):142-153.
  5. Mendling, Jan. 2008. Metrics for process models: Empirical foundations of verification, error prediction, and guidelines for correctness. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, NY: Springer.
  6. Pfeiffer, D. 2007. "Constructing comparable conceptual models with domain specific languages." In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2007). St.Gallen, Switzerland.
  7. Recker, Jan C. and Alexander Dreiling. 2007. "Does it matter which process modelling language we teach or use? An experimental study on understanding process modelling languages without formal education " In Australasian Conference on Information Systems, eds. Mark Toleman, Aileen Cater-Steel and Dave Roberts. Toowoomba: University of Southern Queensland.
  8. Reijers, H. A. and I. Vanderfeesten. 2005. "Cohesion and Coupling Metrics for Workflow Process Design." Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3080(1):290-305.
  9. Vanderfeesten, I., J. Cardoso, J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers and W. Van der Aalst. 2007a. "Quality Metrics for Business Process Models." In Workflow Handbook 2007, ed. L. Fischer. Lighthouse Point, Florida: Workflow Management Coalition.
  10. Vanderfeesten, I., J. Cardoso and H.A. Reijers. 2007b. "A weighted coupling metric for business process models." In The 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE'07). Trondheim, Norway.
  11. Yang, Z., D. Zhang and C. YE. 2006. "Evaluation Metrics for Ontology Complexity and Evolution Analysis." In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering IEEE Computer Society.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Schalles C., Creagh J. and Rebstock M. (2010). A GENERIC METRIC FOR MEASURING COMPLEXITY OF MODELS . In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8425-06-5, pages 436-439. DOI: 10.5220/0002874804360439


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis10,
author={Christian Schalles and John Creagh and Michael Rebstock},
title={A GENERIC METRIC FOR MEASURING COMPLEXITY OF MODELS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2010},
pages={436-439},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002874804360439},
isbn={978-989-8425-06-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - A GENERIC METRIC FOR MEASURING COMPLEXITY OF MODELS
SN - 978-989-8425-06-5
AU - Schalles C.
AU - Creagh J.
AU - Rebstock M.
PY - 2010
SP - 436
EP - 439
DO - 10.5220/0002874804360439