ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE - State of the Art and Challenges

Jorge Cordeiro Duarte, Mamede Lima-Marques

Abstract

This paper analyzes current approaches for Enterprise Architecture (EA). Current EA objectives, concepts, frameworks, models, languages, and tools are discussed. The main initiatives and existing works are presented. Strengths and weaknesses of current approaches and tools are discussed, particularly their complexity, cost and low utilization. A EA theoretical framework is provided using a knowledge management approach. Future trends and some research issues are discussed. A research agenda is proposed in order to reduce EA complexity and make it accessible to organizations of any size.

References

  1. Ambler, S. W. (2009). Agile enterprise architecture.
  2. Arbab, F., Bonsangue, M., Scholten, J. G., , Iacob, M.-E., Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M., Proper, E., and Stam, A. (2002). State of the art in architecture frameworks and tools. Technical report, Telematic Intitute - Netherlands.
  3. Bernus, P. (2003). Enterprise models for enterprise architecture and iso 9000:2000. Annual Reviews in Control, 27(2):211-220.
  4. Boster, M., Liu, S., and Thomas, R. (2000). Getting the most from your enterprise architecture. IT Professional, 2(4):43-1.
  5. Burke, B. (2006). Enterprise architecture: New challenges - new approaches. Report, Gartner Group, New York.
  6. Ernst, A. M., Lankes, J., Schweda, C. M., and Wittenburg, A. (2006). Tool support for enterprise architecture management - strengths and weaknesses. In EDOC 7806: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pages 13-22, Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society.
  7. FEA (2007). Fea consolidated reference model document version 2.3. Technical report, OMB - Office of Management and Budget - USA, Washington.
  8. Guizzardi, G. (2005). Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Master's thesis, Universiteit Twente.
  9. Harmon, P. (2003). Developing an enterprise architecture. Technical report, www.Bptrends.com.
  10. Hessen, J. (2003). Teoria do Conhecimento. Fontes, Sao Paulo.
  11. Hoogervorst, J. (2004). Enterprise architecture enabling integration, agility and change. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13(2):213-233.
  12. Horibe, F. (1999). Managing Knowledge Workers: New Skills and Attitudes to Unlock the Intellectual Capital in Your Organization. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  13. IEEE (2000). Ieee-std-1471-2000 recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems. Technical report.
  14. IFIP-IFAC (1999). Geram:generalised enterprise reference architecture and methodology. Technical report.
  15. ISO (2000). Iso 15704, industrial automation systemsrequirements for enterprise-reference architectures and methodologies. Technical report, ISO.
  16. Jussupova-Mariethoz, Y. and Probst, A.-R. (2007). Business concepts ontology for an enterprise performance and competences monitoring. Computers in Industry, 58(2):118-129.
  17. Kappelman, L. A. and Salmans, B. (2007). Information management practices survey 2007 preliminary report: The state of ea: Progress, not perfection.
  18. Kettinger, W. J. T., C., J. T., and Guha, S. (1997). Business process change: A study of methodologies, techniques, and tools. MIS Quarterly, 21(1).
  19. Kuras, M. (2003). Enterprises as complex systems. The edge, 7(2).
  20. Khoury, G. R. (2007). A Unified Apporach to Enterprise architecture Modeling. PhD thesis, Faculty of Information Technology, Sydney.
  21. Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise architecture at work - Modelling, communication and analysis. SpringerVerlag, Heilderberg.
  22. Macedo, F. L. O. (2005). Arquitetura da informacao: aspectos epistemologicos, cientficos e praicos. Masther theses, Faculdade de Economia, Administracao, Contabilidade e Ciencia da Informao e Documentacao, Universidade de Brasilia, Brasilia.
  23. Morris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  24. Morville, P. and Rosenfeld, L. (2006). Information Architecture fot the Word Wide Web. OReilly, Sebastopol.
  25. NASCIO (2003). Nascio enterprise architec maturity model. Technical report, National Association of State Chief Information Officers.
  26. open Group, T. (2009). Togaf - version 9 enterprise edition. Technical report, San Francisco.
  27. Pereira, C. M. and Sousa, P. (2004). A method to define an enterprise architecture using the zachman framework. 2004:1366-1371.
  28. Rood, M. (1994). Enterprise architecture: definition, content, and utility. In Third Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pages 106-111, New york. IEEE.
  29. Rosenfeld, L. (2007). Enterprise information architecture: Because users do not care about your org chart.
  30. Ross, J. W., Weill, P., and Robertson, D. (2006). Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
  31. Schekkerman, J. (2009a). Enterprise architecture tool selection guide. Technical report.
  32. Schekkerman, J. (2009b). Enterprise architecture validation.
  33. Setzer, V. W. (2001). Dado, Informacao, Conhecimento e Competencia. Editora Escrituras, Sao Paulo.
  34. Stamper, R., Liu, K., Hafkamp, M., and Ades, Y. (2000). Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organisations - a semiotic approach to information systems design. Journal of Behaviour & Information Technology, 19.
  35. Strano, C. and Rehmani, Q. (2007). The role of the enterprise architect. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 5(4):379-396.
  36. Vergidis, K., Tiwari, A., and Majeed, B. (2008). Business process analysis and optimization: Beyond reengineering. IEEE Transactions on systems, man and cybernetics, 38(1).
  37. Vernadat, F. (1996). Enterprise Modeling and Integration: Principles and Applications. Springer, New york.
  38. Vernadat, F. (2007). Interoperable enterprise systems: Principles, concepts, and methods. Annual Reviews in Control, 31(1):137-145.
  39. Wellisch, H. (1996). Abstracting, indexing, classification, thesaurus construction: A glossary. American Society of Indexers, Port Aransas, TX.
  40. Whittle, R. and Myrick, C. B. (2004). Enterprise Business Architecture: The Formal Link between Strategy and Results. CRC, New York.
  41. Winter, R. and Schelp, J. (2008). Enterprise architecture governance: the need for a business-to-it approach. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Applied computing, pages 548-552, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
  42. Wurman, R. S. (2000). Information Anxiety. Hayden/Que, New York.
  43. Zachman, J. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3).
  44. Zins, C. (2007). Conceptual approaches for defining data, information, and knowledge: Research articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(4):479-493.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Cordeiro Duarte J. and Lima-Marques M. (2010). ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE - State of the Art and Challenges . In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8425-06-5, pages 101-112. DOI: 10.5220/0002970001010112


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis10,
author={Jorge Cordeiro Duarte and Mamede Lima-Marques},
title={ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE - State of the Art and Challenges},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2010},
pages={101-112},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002970001010112},
isbn={978-989-8425-06-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE - State of the Art and Challenges
SN - 978-989-8425-06-5
AU - Cordeiro Duarte J.
AU - Lima-Marques M.
PY - 2010
SP - 101
EP - 112
DO - 10.5220/0002970001010112