INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL IN TURKISH PRIVATE BANKS

Fethi Calisir, Cigdem Altin Gumussoy, Faruk Cirit, Emrah Yorulmaz, Ayse Elvan Bayraktaroglu

Abstract

In order to keep up in today’s competitive banking sector, banks need to offer more value added and more diversified services. Service quality of banks highly depends on intellectual capital. In this study, VAICTM (Value Added Intellectual Coefficient) has been used, developed by Pulic in 1998, to compare the private banks in Turkey in terms of intellectual capital performance for the years 2002-2006. For all years except 2002, Akbank T.A.S. has the highest VAICTM values. It also tops the list with the highest HCE and SCE scores from 2002 to 2006. Adabank A.S. has the worst scores in HCE, SCE, and VAICTM for almost all years, while it occupies the highest places in CEE listing.

References

  1. Appuhami, B.A.R., 2007. The impact of intellectual capital on investors' capital gains on shares: An empirical investigation of Thai banking, finance & insurance sector. International Management Review, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 14-25.
  2. Chan, K.H., 2009a. Impact of intellectual capital on organizational performance An empirical study of companies in the Hang Seng Index (Part I). The Learning Organization, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 4-21.
  3. Chan, K.H., 2009b. Impact of intellectual capital on organizational performance An empirical study of companies in the Hang Seng Index (Part II). The Learning Organization, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 22-39.
  4. Chang, S., 2007. Valuing Intellectual Capital and Firms' Performance: Modifiying Value Added Intellectual Coefficient (VAIC) in Taiwan IT industry. Ageno School of Business, Golden Gate University, August.
  5. Chen, M., Cheng, S., Hwang, Y., 2005. An empirical investigation of the relationship between intellectual capital and firms' market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 159-176.
  6. Firer, S., Williams, S.M., 2003. Intellectual capital and traditional measures of corporate performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 348- 360.
  7. Ghosh, S., Mondal, A., 2009. Indian software and pharmaceutical sector IC and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 369- 388.
  8. Goh, P.C., 2005. Intellectual capital performance of commercial banks in Malaysia. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 385-396.
  9. Kamath, G.B., 2007. The intellectual capital performance of Indian banking sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 96-123.
  10. Kamath, G.B., 2008. Intellectual capital and corporate performance in Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 684- 704.
  11. Mavridis, D.G., 2004. The intellectual capital performance of the Japanese banking sector. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 92-115.
  12. Ozturk, M.B., Demirgunes, K., 2007. Determination of effect of intellectual capital on firm value via value added intellectual coefficient methodology: An empirical study on ISE-listed manufacturing firms. ISE Review, Vol. 10 No. 37, pp. 59-77.
  13. Pulic, A., 1997. The physical and intellectual capital of Austrian banks, available at: http://www.vaicon.net/start.htm (accessed 11 May, 2010).
  14. Pulic, A., 1998. Measuring the performance of intellectual potential in knowledge economy, available at:
  15. Pulic, A., 2000. MVA and VAIC analysis of randomly selected companies from FTSE 260, available at: http://www.vaic-on.net/start.htm (accessed 9 July, 2009).
  16. Pulic, A., 2002a. Do we know if we create or destroy value?, available at: http://www.vaic-on.net/start.htm (accessed 9 July, 2009).
  17. Pulic, A., 2002b. Value creation efficiency analysis of Croatian banks, available at: http://www.vaicon.net/start.htm (accessed 11 May, 2010).
  18. Shiu, H., 2006. The application of the value added intellectual coefficient to measure corporate performance: Evidence from technological firm. International Journal of Management, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 356-365.
  19. Stewart, T.A., 1997. Intellectual Capital: The new wealth of organizations, Doubleday/Currency, New York, NY.
  20. Tan, H.P., Plowman, D., Hancock, P., 2007. Intellectual capital and financial returns of companies. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 76-95.
  21. Tan, H.P., Plowman, D., Hancock, P., 2008. The evolving research of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 585-608.
  22. Wang, J., 2006. Utilizing Skandia navigator system and Ohlson model to evaluate the intellectual capital performance for Taiwan electronic corporations. The Business Review, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 186-192.
  23. Yalama, A., Coskun, M., 2007. Intellectual capital performance of quoted banks on the Istanbul stock exchange market. Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 256-271.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Calisir F., Altin Gumussoy C., Cirit F., Yorulmaz E. and Elvan Bayraktaroglu A. (2010). INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL IN TURKISH PRIVATE BANKS . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2010) ISBN 978-989-8425-30-0, pages 189-194. DOI: 10.5220/0003088201890194


in Bibtex Style

@conference{kmis10,
author={Fethi Calisir and Cigdem Altin Gumussoy and Faruk Cirit and Emrah Yorulmaz and Ayse Elvan Bayraktaroglu},
title={INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL IN TURKISH PRIVATE BANKS},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2010)},
year={2010},
pages={189-194},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003088201890194},
isbn={978-989-8425-30-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing - Volume 1: KMIS, (IC3K 2010)
TI - INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL IN TURKISH PRIVATE BANKS
SN - 978-989-8425-30-0
AU - Calisir F.
AU - Altin Gumussoy C.
AU - Cirit F.
AU - Yorulmaz E.
AU - Elvan Bayraktaroglu A.
PY - 2010
SP - 189
EP - 194
DO - 10.5220/0003088201890194