TAXONOMY OF PURPOSE OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE

Nestori Syynimaa

Abstract

Initial phase of all Enterprise Architecture (EA) initiatives is important. One of the most crucial tasks in that phase is to sell EA to the top management by explaining its purpose. In this paper, by using semiotic framework we show that there is a clear gap between the definition of EA and its purpose. Contribution of this paper is a taxonomy that expands knowledge of pragmatics of EA, and that can be used as a tool for explaining the purpose of EA. Grounded theory is used to form the taxonomy. Data is collected from a discussion group used by EA practitioners. Results indicate that the purpose of EA is to meet organisations’ stakeholder’s goals and to create value to organisation. Results are in line with current literature. Most interesting result is that EA practitioners seem to realise that technical solutions are not the purpose of EA, but means for fulfilling it.

References

  1. Barron, T., Chiang, R., & Storey, V. (1999). A semiotics framework for information systems classification and development. Decision Support Systems, 25, 1-17.
  2. Beynon-Davies, P. (2009). Formated technology and informated action: The nature of information technology. International Journal of Information Management, 29(4), 272-282.
  3. CIO Council. (2001). A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture. Available at http://www. cio.gov/documents/bpeaguide.pdf.
  4. Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics: Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  5. Lankhorst, M. (2009). Enterprise architecture at work: Modelling, communication and analysis: SpringerVerlag GmbH.
  6. LinkedIn. (2010). The Enterprise Architecture Network's Group Profile. Retrieved 27th February, 2010, from http://www.linkedin.com/groups?about=&gid=36781 &trk=anet_ug_grppro
  7. Liu, K. (2000). Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Liu, K., Clarke, R., Andersen, P., & Stamper, R. (2001). Information, organisation, and technology: studies in organisational semiotics: Kluwer Academic Pub.
  9. Pandit, N. (1996). The creation of theory: A recent application of the grounded theory method. The qualitative report, 2(4), 1-20.
  10. Pavlak, A. (2006). Enterprise Architecture: Lessons from Classical Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 2(2), 20-27.
  11. Perks, C., & Beveridge, T. (2003). Guide to enterprise IT architecture: Springer Verlag.
  12. Pulkkinen, M. (2008). Enterprise Architecture as a Collaboration Tool. Jyväskylä Studies in Computing, 93, 134.
  13. Rafidah, A. R., Dahalin, Z. M., Dahari, R., Kamaruddin, S. S., & Abdullah, S. (2007). Enterprise Information Architecture (EIA): Assessment of Current Practices in Malaysian Organizations. Paper presented at the HICSS-40. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA.
  14. Schekkerman, J. (2004). How to Survive in the Jungle of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks: Creating or Choosing an Enterprise Architecture Framework: Trafford Publishing.
  15. Sims, O. (2005). The Purpose of Enterprise Architecture. Enterprise Architecture Advisory Service, 8(6).
  16. Smith, K. (2009). The Enterprise Architecture Network discussions: Describe the purpose of EA in one 160 character SMS message. Retrieved 2nd January, 2010, from http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers? viewQuestionAndAnswers=&gid=36781&discussionI D=8240387
  17. Stamper, R. (1973). Information in business and administrative systems: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY, USA.
  18. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Sage Publ.
  19. TOGAF. (2009). TOGAF Version 9: Van Haren Publishing.
  20. ValtIT. (2007). Finnish National Enterprise Architecture Development Project - Final Report, Unified model for holistic planning of functionality and information systems Available from http://www.vm.fi/julkaisut
  21. Zachman, J. (1997). Enterprise architecture: The issue of the century. Database Programming and Design, 10(3), 44-53.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Syynimaa N. (2010). TAXONOMY OF PURPOSE OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE . In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations - Volume 1: ICISO, ISBN 978-989-8425-26-3, pages 322-328. DOI: 10.5220/0003270303220328


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iciso10,
author={Nestori Syynimaa},
title={TAXONOMY OF PURPOSE OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations - Volume 1: ICISO,},
year={2010},
pages={322-328},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003270303220328},
isbn={978-989-8425-26-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Informatics and Semiotics in Organisations - Volume 1: ICISO,
TI - TAXONOMY OF PURPOSE OF ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE
SN - 978-989-8425-26-3
AU - Syynimaa N.
PY - 2010
SP - 322
EP - 328
DO - 10.5220/0003270303220328