Contextualising Information Quality: A Method-Based Approach

Markus Helfert, Owen Foley

Abstract

Information Quality is an ever increasing problem. Despite the advancements in technology and information quality investment the problem continues to grow. The context of the deployment of an information system in a complex environment and its associated information quality problems has yet to be fully examined by researchers. Our research endeavours to address this shortfall by specifying a method for context related information quality. A method engineering approach is employed to specify such a method for context related information quality dimension selection. Furthermore, the research presented in this paper examined different information systems’ context factors and their effect upon information quality dimensions both objectively and subjectively. Our contribution is a novel information quality method that is context related; that is it takes the user, task and environment into account. Results of an experiment indicate as well as feedback from practitioners confirm the application of our method and indeed that context affects the perception of information quality.

References

  1. Wand, Y. and R. Wang, Data Quality Dimensions in Ontological Foundations. Communications of the ACM, 1996. 39: p. 184-192.
  2. Wang, R. and D. Strong, Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1996. 12: p. 5-34.
  3. Pipino, L., Y. Lee, and R. Wang, Data Quality Assessment. Communications of the ACM, 2002: p. 211-218.
  4. Kahn, B. and D. Strong, Information Quality Benchmarks: Product and Service. Communications of the ACM, 2002: p. 184-192.
  5. Recker, J., et al. Model-Driven Enterprise Systems Configuration. in 18th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. 2006. Luxembourg: Springer.
  6. Lee, Y., Crafting Rules: Context-Reflective Data Quality Problem Solving. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2004. 20(3): p. 93-119.
  7. Redman, T., Data Quality for the Information Age. 1996: Artech House Publishers.
  8. AlHakim, L., Challenges of Managing Information Quality in Service Organizations. 2007: Idea Group Pub.
  9. Date, C., Databases in Depth. 2005: O Reilly.
  10. Loshin, D., Enterprise Knowledge Management - The Data Quality Approach. 2001: Morgan Kaufmann.
  11. AlHakim, L., Information Quality Management Theory and Applications 2007.
  12. Olson, J., Data Quality: The Accuracy Dimension. 2003: Morgan Kaufmann.
  13. Adelman, S., L. Moss, and M. Abai, Data Strategy. 2005: Addison-Wesley.
  14. Sangwan, R., et al., Global Software Development Handbook. 2007: Auerbach Publications.
  15. Knight, S. and J. Burn, Developing a Framework for Assessing Information Quality on the World Wide Web. Informing Science, 2005. 8: p. 159-172.
  16. Helfert, M. and M. Ge. A Review of Information Quality Research. in 11th International Conference on Information Quality. 2006.
  17. Morris, S., J. Meed, and N. Svensen, The Intelligent Manager. 1996, London: Pitman Publishing.
  18. Huang, K., Y. Lee, and R. Wang, Quality Information and Knowledge Management. 1999.
  19. Chengalur-Smith, I. and P. Duchessi, The Initiation and Adoption of Client Server Technology in Organizations. Information and Management, 1999. 35(7): p. 77-88.
  20. Miller, An expanded instrument for evaluating information system success. Information and Management, 1996. 31(2): p. 103-118.
  21. Berndt, E.R. and D.M. Cutler, Medical Care Output and Productivity. 2001: National Bureau of Economic Research.
  22. Xu, H., et al., Data Quality Issues in implementing an ERP. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2002. 102(1): p. 47-59.
  23. Davenport, T., Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment. 1997, Oxford: Oxford Universirty Press.
  24. Heinrich, B. and M. Helfert. Analyzing Data Quality Investments in CRM: a Model Based Approach. in 8th International Conference on Information Quality. 2003. Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  25. Ballou, D.P., et al., Modelling Information Manufacturing Systems to Determine Information Product Quality. Management Science, 1998. 44(4): p. 462-484.
  26. Amicis, F.D. and C. Batini, A Methodology for Data Quality Assessment on Financial Data. Studies in Communication Sciences, 2004. 4(2): p. 115-137.
  27. Kahn and Strong. Product and Service Performance Model for Information Quality: an update. in 4th International Conference on Information Quality. 1998. Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  28. Xu, H. and A. Koronios, Understanding Information Quality in E-business. Journal of Computer Information Sytems, 2004. 45(2): p. 73-82.
  29. Rittberger, M. Certification of Information Services. in Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Information Quality. 1999. Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  30. English, L., Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality. 1999, New York: Wiley & Sons.
  31. Li, S. and B. Lin, Accessing Information Sharing and Information Quality in Supply Chain Management. Decision Support Systems, 2006. 42(3): p. 1641-1656.
  32. Ballou, D.P. and G.K. Tayi, Enhancing Data Quality in Data Warehouse Environments. Communications of the ACM, 1999. 42(1): p. 73-78.
  33. Fisher, C., et al., Introduction to Information Quality. 2006: MIT.
  34. Goodhue, D.L., Understanding user evaluations of Information Systems. Management Science, 1995. 41(12): p. 1827-1842.
  35. Misser, P., et al., Improving data quality in practice: a case study in the Italian public administration. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 2003. 13(2): p. 125-169.
  36. Ballou, D.P. and H. Pazher, Modeling completeness versus consistency tradeoffs in information decision contexts. IEEE Transactions in Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2003. 15(1): p. 240-243.
  37. Wang, R.Y., A Product Perspective on Total Quality Management. Communications of the ACM, 1998. 41(2): p. 58-65.
  38. Brinkkemper, S., K. Lyytinen, and R.J. Welke, Method Engineering Principles of method construction and tool support. 1996: Chapman & Hall.
  39. Punter, T. and K. Lemmen, The META-model: towards a new approach for Method Engineering. Information and Software Technology, 1996. 38(4): p. 295-305.
  40. Gutzwiller, T., Das CC fur den Entwurf von betrieblichen, transaktionsrieentierten Informationssytems, Physica. 1994: Heidelberg.
  41. Greenwald, R., R. Stackowiak, and R. Stern, Oracle Essentials: Oracle Database 11g. 4th ed. 2004: O Reilly.
  42. Field, A. and G. Hole, How to Design and Report Experiments. 2006.
  43. Caulcutt, R., Statistics in research and development. 1991: CRC Press.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Helfert M. and Foley O. (2010). Contextualising Information Quality: A Method-Based Approach . In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Enterprise Systems and Technology - Volume 1: I-WEST, ISBN 978-989-8425-44-7, pages 149-163. DOI: 10.5220/0004466101490163


in Bibtex Style

@conference{i-west10,
author={Markus Helfert and Owen Foley},
title={Contextualising Information Quality: A Method-Based Approach},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Enterprise Systems and Technology - Volume 1: I-WEST,},
year={2010},
pages={149-163},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004466101490163},
isbn={978-989-8425-44-7},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Enterprise Systems and Technology - Volume 1: I-WEST,
TI - Contextualising Information Quality: A Method-Based Approach
SN - 978-989-8425-44-7
AU - Helfert M.
AU - Foley O.
PY - 2010
SP - 149
EP - 163
DO - 10.5220/0004466101490163