Thieme Hennis, Heide Lukosch


If we consider knowledge to be the result of a negotiation process about references and meaning between individuals, then, we should consider it also a collective or social property. This view underlies numerous initiatives worldwide providing unrestricted online access to educational content, software tools, and implementation resources, commonly referred to as Open Educational Resources (OER). In earlier research on the use of Open Educational Resources at the TU Delft, we addressed the issue of sustainability of OER projects in terms of organization, motivation, types of resources, types of reuse, and funding and revenue models. In this paper, we focus on how social mechanisms can contribute to increase motivation amongst stakeholders to maintain and create useful content, and engage in meaningful interactions within learning communities.


  1. Ackerman, M. et al., 2004. Communities and Technologies: An Approach to Foster Social Capital? Practice, 406-408.
  2. Allert, H., 2004. Coherent Social Systems for Learning: An Approach for Contextualized and Community Centred Metadata. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2004, 1-30.
  3. Ardichvili, A., 2008. Learning and Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities of Practice: Motivators, Barriers, and Enablers. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 541-554.
  4. Berlanga, A. et al., 2009. Guidelines to Foster Interaction in Online Communities. In R. Koper Learning Network Services for Professional Development. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 27-42.
  5. Bouman, W. et al., 2007. The realm of sociality: notes on the design of social software, Amsterdam.
  6. Bruner, J., 1991. The narrative construction of reality. Critical inquiry, 18(1), 1-21.
  7. Chen, Y. et al., 2009. Social Comparisons and Contributions to Online Communities: A Field Experiment on MovieLens. American Economic Review, 1-51.
  8. Davidson, C. & Goldberg, D., 2009. The future of learning institutions in a digital age. The MIT Press, 81.
  9. Downes, S., 2008. Places to Go : Connectivism & Connective Knowledge. Innovate, 5(1), 6.
  10. Endres, M. et al., 2007. Tacit knowledge sharing, selfefficacy theory, and application to the Open Source Community. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(3), 92-103.
  11. Garfield, S., 2006. Ten reasons why people don't share their knowledge. KM Review, 9(2), 10-11.
  12. Hennis, T.A. & Kolfschoten, G.L., 2010. Understanding Social Mechanisms in Online Communities. In Group Decision and Negotiation 2010. Delft.
  13. Hennis, T. A., 2009. Platform voor promovendi - Lessons learned leidt tot achtstappenplan. Intellektueel Kapitaal, (4), 36-40.
  14. Hennis, T. A., 2009. Platform voor promovendi - Valkuilen op de werkplaats. Intellektueel Kapitaal, (3), 40-42.
  15. Hout-Wolters, B. V., Simons, R. & Volet, S., 2000. Active Learning: Self-directed learning and independent work. In R. Simons Springer. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 21-36.
  16. Hylén, J., 2006. Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. Open Education, 11.
  17. Jones, C. & Steeples, C., 2001. Perspectives and issues in networked learning. In Networked learning. SpringerVerlag New York, Inc., p. 14.
  18. Koh, J. et al., 2007. Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM, 50(2), 68- 73.
  19. Kollock, P., 1999. The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace. In M. Smith & P. Kollock Communities in cyberspace.
  20. Laat, M. D. & Lally, V. I., 2003. Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. , 7-39.
  21. Laat, M. D., 2006. Networked Learning. , 7-9.
  22. Lampel, J. & Bhalla, A., 2007. The Role of Status Seeking in Online Communities: Giving the Gift of Experience. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), article 5.
  23. Lave, J. & Wenger, E., 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge Univ Pr.
  24. Lee, H., 2008. The effects of socio-technical enablers on knowledge sharing: an exploratory examination. Journal of Information Science, 34(5), 742-754.
  25. Ludford, P. J. et al., 2004. Think different: increasing online community participation using uniqueness and group dissimilarity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. New York: ACM, pp. 631-638.
  26. McLure-Wasko, M. & Faraj, S., 2005. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.
  27. McLure-Wasko, M., Teigland, R. & Faraj, S., 2009. The provision of online public goods: Examining social structure in an electronic network of practice. Decision Support Systems, 47, 254-265.
  28. McMillan, D. & Chavis, D., 1986. Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
  29. Moore, T. D. & Serva, M. A., 2007. Understanding Member Motivation for Contributing to Different Types of Virtual Communities: A Proposed Framework. In SIGMIS-CPR 7807: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on 2007 computer personnel doctoral consortium and research conference. New York: ACM, pp. 153-158.
  30. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L. & Hakkarainen, K., 2004. Models of Innovative Knowledge Communities and Three Metaphors of Learning. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 557-576.
  31. Paris, S. & Winograd, P., 2003. The role of self-regulated learning in contextual teaching: Principles and practices for teacher preparation. Preparing Teachers to Use Contextual Teaching and Learning Strategies to Improve Student Success in and beyond School.
  32. Pearson, E., 2007. Digital gifts: Participation and gift exchange in Livejournal communities. First Monday, 12(5).
  33. Piaget, J. & Cook, M., 1952. The origins of intelligence in children, International Universities Press New York.
  34. Preece, J. & Maloney-Krichmar, D., 2005. Online communities: Design, theory, and practice. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(4).
  35. Preece, J. & Maloney-Krichmar, D., 2003. Online communities: focusing on sociability and usability. In J. Jacko & A. Sears Handbook of human-computer interaction. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers, p. 596-620.
  36. Rashid, A. M. et al., 2006. Motivating participation by displaying the value of contribution. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems - CHI 7806. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, p. 955.
  37. Rheingold, H. L., 1993. Virtual Communities and the WELL. GNN Magazine, (1).
  38. Rieber, L., 1996. Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational technology research and development, 44(2), 43-58.
  39. Siemens, G., 2005. Connectivism - A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.
  40. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. & Suthers, D., 1999. Computersupported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In S. Sawyer Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  41. Stahl, G., 2003. Meaning and interpretation in collaboration. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe Designing for Change in Networked Learning Environments: Proceedings of CSCL 7803. Bergen: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 523-532.
  42. United Nations General Assembly, 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Wikipedia.
  43. Veen, W., Lukosch, H. & Vries, P. D., 2008. Improving organizational learning through Networked Learning. In GI2008. pp. 22-31.
  44. Veldhuis-Diermanse, A. E. et al., 2006. Analysing Learning Processes and Quality of Knowledge Construction in Networked Learning. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 12(1), 41-57.
  45. Vries, P.D., 2008. Networked Learning for Lifelong Learners. Journal of documentation, (September), 26.
  46. Vygotsky, L. & Cole, M., 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes,
  47. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W., 2002. Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge, Boston, MA: HBS Press.
  48. Wenger, E., 2000. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Hennis T. and Lukosch H. (2011). SOCIAL MECHANISMS TO MOTIVATE LEARNING WITH REMOTE EXPERIMENTS - Design Choices to Foster Online Peer-based Learning . In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-8425-50-8, pages 183-188. DOI: 10.5220/0003307301830188

in Bibtex Style

author={Thieme Hennis and Heide Lukosch},
title={SOCIAL MECHANISMS TO MOTIVATE LEARNING WITH REMOTE EXPERIMENTS - Design Choices to Foster Online Peer-based Learning},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
SN - 978-989-8425-50-8
AU - Hennis T.
AU - Lukosch H.
PY - 2011
SP - 183
EP - 188
DO - 10.5220/0003307301830188