Rocío Calvo, Ana Iglesias, Lourdes Moreno


The use of new technologies has been increasing during last years in education. Specifically, the use of e-learning systems provides for students more freedom to learn through Internet when and where they prefer in each moment. However, e-learning tools are not perfect tools. Most of these e-learning tools present accessibility barriers, so not all students are able to use them completely in their studies. The goal of this paper is to evaluate if Moodle e-learning web tool is accessible for visually impaired people using assistive technologies like screen readers. The evaluation has been divided in two main objectives. Firstly, Moodle was evaluated from a user perspective.The interaction of a blind student with the system was simulated and two screen readers were used. Secondly, this tool was evaluated from an accessibility expert perspective and it was analysed if Moodle is in accordance to ATAG and WCAG W3C guidelines.


  1. Buzzi, M.C., Buzzi M. and Leporini, B. (2009) Accessing e-Learning Systems via Screen Reader: An Example. Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains Jacko. San Diego: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. pp. 21-30.
  2. Chou, S-W and Liu, C-H. (2005): Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: a learner control perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 21(1), pp 65-76.
  3. Cook A. M. and Polgar J. M. (2007). Cook and Hussey's Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice (3rd Ed). Saint Louis: Mosby.
  4. Craven, J. (2003): Access to electronic resources by visually impaired people. Information research. Volume 8(4), paper no. 156.
  5. Debevc, M., Verlic M., Kosec, P. and Stjepanovic Z(2007). How Can HCI Factors Improve Accessibility of m-Learning for Persons with Special Needs?. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services. C. Beijing: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg pp. 539-548.
  6. Elias, T. (2010), Universal Instructional Design Principles for Moodle, Canada International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, ISSN: 1492-3831, Volume 11, Number 2. May - 2010
  7. Fichten C., Asunción J., Barile M and Ferraro V (2009). Accessibility of e-Learning and Computer and Information Technologies for Students with Visual Impairments in Postsecondary Education. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 103 (9), pp. 543-557
  8. Fisseler B. and Bühler C (2007). Accessible E-Learning and Educational Technology - Extending Learning Opportunities for People with Disabilities. Proceedings of the International Conference of “Interactive computer aided learning” ICL2007 : EPortofolio and Quality in e-Learning. September 26 -28. Villach(Austria), pp.1-15
  9. Harman, K. and Koohang, A. (2007) Learning objects: standards, metadata, repositories & LCMS, Santa Rosa :Informing Science Press
  10. Holmes, B. and Gardner, J (2006). E-learning: concepts and practice. London: SAGE
  11. Marjolein C. J. Caniëls, Anke H. J. Smeets-Verstraeten and Herman M. J. van den Bosch (2007) LMS, LCMS, AND E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS Where Did the Didactics Go?. The Challenges of Educating People to Lead in a Challenging World. Netherlands: Springer. pp. 401- 421
  12. Moodle (2006). Current status Moodle accesibility. Available in: Accessibility_Specification#Results_from_Initial_OU _Jan.2FFeb_2006_Evaluation
  13. Moreno L., Iglesias A., Calvo R., Delgado S. and Zaragoza L. (2010). Disability Standards and Guidelines for Learning Management Systems: Evaluating Accessibility. Book Chapter - Higher Education Institutions and Learning Management Systems: Adoption and Standardization..Publisher: IGI Global.
  14. Power, C., Petrie, H., Vasily Sakharov, V. and Swallow, D (2010) Virtual Learning Environments: Another Barrier to Blended and E-Learning. Computers Helping People with Special Needs 12th International Conference, ICCHP July 14-16 Viena (Austria), 2010, pp. 520-526
  15. Universal Desing for learning UDL Guidelines 1.0. (2010) Available in: aboutudl/udlguidelines
  16. W3C (2008) WAI, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, WCAG 2.0. Available in: /TR/WCAG10/
  17. W3C (2010), WAI, Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, ATAG 2.0 Available in:
  18. W3C(2002), WAI, User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (UAAG). Available in: TR/WAI-USERAGENT.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Calvo R., Iglesias A. and Moreno L. (2011). ACCESSIBILITY EVALUATION OF MOODLE CENTRED IN VISUAL IMPAIREMENTS . In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST, ISBN 978-989-8425-51-5, pages 221-228. DOI: 10.5220/0003342902210228

in Bibtex Style

author={Rocío Calvo and Ana Iglesias and Lourdes Moreno},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,
SN - 978-989-8425-51-5
AU - Calvo R.
AU - Iglesias A.
AU - Moreno L.
PY - 2011
SP - 221
EP - 228
DO - 10.5220/0003342902210228