STUDENTS’ ACCEPTANCE OF E-GROUP COLLABORATION LEARNING

Adam Marks

Abstract

Online students in higher education are increasingly using Electronic Group Collaboration learning tools such as Discussion Forums, Blogs, Wikis, and Journals within their course environment. This study discusses some of these new online group-collaborative tools, and the extent to which they are being used. This study also investigates the level of acceptance of learners of these tools. The findings of this study describe the number and type of Electronic Group Collaboration tools most preferred by online students, and the reasons behind their preference.

References

  1. Al-Fadhli, S., 2010. Factors Influencing the Acceptance of Distance Learning: A Case Study of Arab Open University in Kuwait”, Online Journal of Distance Learning Education. Vol 13-3.
  2. Becker, D., Dwyer, M. 1998. The impact of student verbal/visual learning style preference on implementing groupware in the classroom. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 2(2), 61-69.
  3. Black, G. 2002. Student assessment of virtual teams in an online management course. Journal of Business Administration Online, 1(2).
  4. Blackboard Manual, “Blackboard Learn Manual. 2010. V9.1.
  5. Boulos, M., Marambe, I., Wheeler, S. 2006. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Medical Education Vol, 6:41.
  6. Clark, R. E. 1994. Media will never influence learning. Education Technology Research and Development, 37(1):57-66.
  7. Cuban, L. 2003. Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Cambridge', MA: Harvard University Press
  8. Gunawardena, C., Clsaac, M. 2004. Distance education. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed.) (pp. 355-395). Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications & Technology.
  9. Hackley, P., Webster, J. 1997. Teaching Effectiveness in Technology-Mediated Distance Learning. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (6), 1282 - 1309.
  10. Hiltz, S. R., Coppola, N., Rotter, N., Turoff, M. 1999. Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure, multimethod approach. Journal of A synchronous Learning Networks , 4(2), 103-125.
  11. Jermann, P., Soller, A., Muehlenbrock, M. 2005. From Mirroring to Guiding: A Review of State of the Art Technology for Supporting Collaborative Learning, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education archive Volume 15 Issue 4.
  12. Laurillard, D. 2002. Rethinking University Teaching”, London: Routledge Falmer.
  13. Martins, L., Kellermans, F. 2004. A Model of Business School Student's Acceptance of a Web- Based Course Management System. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3(1), 7-28.
  14. Meier, P., Simon, B. 2000. Reengineering Undergraduate Teaching by Introducing Internet-based Learning Information Systems. Springer, Vienna.
  15. Muilenburg, L., Berge, Z. 2005. Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48.
  16. Myers, J. 1991. Cooperative learning in heterogeneous classes. Cooperative Learning, 11(4).
  17. Newman, D.R, Webb, B., Cochrane, C. 2008. A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in faceto-face and computer supported group learning, Queens University Belfast, Information Management Dept.
  18. Richardson, J., Swan, K. 2003. Examining Social Presence in Online Courses in Relation to Students' Perceived Learning and Satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
  19. Rovai, A. P., Barnum, K. T. 2003. On-Line Course Effectiveness: An Analysis of Student Interactions and Perceptions of Learning. Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 57-73.
  20. Saade, R., Bahli, B. 2005. The Impact of Cognitive Absorption on Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use in On-line Learning: Information and Management, 42, 317-327.
  21. Simon, B., Haghirian, P., Schlegelmilch, P. 2002. Case Study Teaching via Collaborative Inormation Technology”. Proceedings of ECIS (European Conference on Information Systems.) Gdansk, Poland.
  22. So, H., Kim, B. 2005. Instructional methods for computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL): A review of case studies”. Paper presented at the 10th CSCL Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Marks A. (2011). STUDENTS’ ACCEPTANCE OF E-GROUP COLLABORATION LEARNING . In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 4: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8425-56-0, pages 269-274. DOI: 10.5220/0003409602690274


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis11,
author={Adam Marks},
title={STUDENTS’ ACCEPTANCE OF E-GROUP COLLABORATION LEARNING},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 4: ICEIS,},
year={2011},
pages={269-274},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003409602690274},
isbn={978-989-8425-56-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 4: ICEIS,
TI - STUDENTS’ ACCEPTANCE OF E-GROUP COLLABORATION LEARNING
SN - 978-989-8425-56-0
AU - Marks A.
PY - 2011
SP - 269
EP - 274
DO - 10.5220/0003409602690274