METHOD FAMILY DESCRIPTION AND CONFIGURATION

Deneckère Rébecca, Elena Kornyshova, Colette Rolland

Abstract

The role of variability in Software engineering grows increasingly as it allows developing solutions that can be easily adapted to a specific context and reusing existing knowledge. In order to deal with variability in the method engineering (ME) domain, we suggest applying the notion of method families. Method components are organized as a method family, which is configured in the given project. As variability relates to variation points, our proposal is to consider the method family configuration as a decision-making (DM) process. We illustrate our approach by a method family dealing with scenario elicitation.

References

  1. Deneckere, R. and Kornyshova, E., 2010. Process line configuration: an indicator-based Guidance of the Intentional Model MAP. EMMSAD'10, Hammamet, Tunisia.
  2. Maiden, N. A. M., 1998. CREWS-SAVRE: Scenarios for Acquiring and Validating Requirements. Journal of Automated Software Engineering.
  3. Ralyte, J. and Rolland, C., 2001. An assembly process model for method engineering. CAISE'01, Interlaken, Switzerland.
  4. Rolland, C., Souveyet, C. and Ben Achour, C., 1998. Guiding Goal Modelling Using Scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, special issue on Scenario Management, Vol.24, No.12, pp 1055-1071
  5. Rolland, C., 2007. Capturing system intentionality with maps. In the book Conceptual Modelling in Information Systems Engineering, J. Krogstie, A. Opdahl, S, Brinkkemper (Eds.).
  6. Rolland, C., 2010. Method engineering: trends and challenges. RCIS'10, Invited Talk.
  7. Roy, B., 1996. Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers
  8. Santos, E., Pimentel, J., Castro, J., Sanchez, J., Pastor, O., 2010. Configuring the Variability of Business Process Models Using Non-Functional Requirements. EMMSAD'10, Hammamet, Tunisia.
  9. Svahnberg et al., 2001. On the notion of variability in Software Product Lines. Proceedings of the Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software architecture.
  10. Taylor, C., 1964. The Explanation of Behaviour. London: Routledge.
  11. Van Gurp, J., 2000. Variability in Software Systems, the key to Software Reuse. Licentiate Thesis, University of Groningen, Sweden.
  12. Van Slooten, K., and Hodes, B., 1996. Characterising IS development projects. IFIP WG8.1 Conference on Method Engineering.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Rébecca D., Kornyshova E. and Rolland C. (2011). METHOD FAMILY DESCRIPTION AND CONFIGURATION . In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8425-55-3, pages 384-387. DOI: 10.5220/0003494503840387


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis11,
author={Deneckère Rébecca and Elena Kornyshova and Colette Rolland},
title={METHOD FAMILY DESCRIPTION AND CONFIGURATION},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2011},
pages={384-387},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003494503840387},
isbn={978-989-8425-55-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - METHOD FAMILY DESCRIPTION AND CONFIGURATION
SN - 978-989-8425-55-3
AU - Rébecca D.
AU - Kornyshova E.
AU - Rolland C.
PY - 2011
SP - 384
EP - 387
DO - 10.5220/0003494503840387