Leifur Leifsson, Slawomir Koziel, Stanislav Ogurtsov


The paper discusses multi-fidelity design optimization of axisymmetric bodies in incompressible fluid flow. The algorithm uses a computationally cheap low-fidelity model to construct a surrogate of an accurate but CPU-intensive high-fidelity model. The low-fidelity model is based on the same governing equations as the high-fidelity one, but exploits coarser discretization and relaxed convergence criteria. The low-fidelity model is corrected by aligning the hull surface pressure and skin friction distributions with the corresponding distributions of the high-fidelity model using a multiplicative response correction. Our approach can be implemented in both direct and inverse design approaches. Results of two case studies for hull drag minimization and target pressure distribution matching show that optimized designs are obtained at substantially lower computational cost (over 94%) when compared to the direct high-fidelity model optimization.


  1. Allen, B., Vorus, W. S., and Prestero, T., 2000, Propulsion system performance enhancements on REMUS AUVs, In Proceedings MTS/IEEE Oceans 2000, September, Providence, Rhode Island.
  2. Alexandrov, N. M., Lewis, R. M., Gumbert, C.R., Green, L. L., and Newman, P.A., 2000, Optimization with variable-fidelity models applied to wing design, 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, NV, AIAA Paper 2000-0841.
  3. Alexandrov, N. M., Lewis, R. M., 2001, An overview of first-order model management for engineering optimization. Optimization and Engineering. 2, 413- 430.
  4. Alvarez, A., Bertram, V., and Gualdesi, L., 2009, Hull hydrodynamic optimization of autonomous underwater vehicles operating at snorkelling depth, Ocean Engineering, vol. 36, pp. 105-112.
  5. Bandler, J. W., Cheng, Q. S., Dakroury, S. A., Mohamed, A. S., Bakr, M.H., Madsen, K., and Søndergaard, J., 2004, Space Mapping: The State of The Art. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., 52(1), pp. 337-361.
  6. Braembussche, R. A., 2008, Numerical Optimization for Advanced Turbomachinery Design, In Optimization and Computational Fluid Dynamics, Thevenin, D. and Janiga, G., editors, Springer, pp. 147-189.
  7. Dalton, C., and Zedan, M. F., 1980, Design of low-drag axisymmetric shapes by the inverse method, J. Hydronautics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 48-54.
  8. Dulikravich, G. S., 1991, Aerodynamic shape design and optimization, 29th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.
  9. de Barros, E. A., Dantas, J. L. D., Pascoal, A. M., and de Sá, E., 2008, Investigation of normal force and moment coefficients for an auv at nonlinear angle of attack and sideslip angle, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 538-549.
  10. Echeverría, D., and Hemker, P.W., 2008, Manifold mapping: a two-level optimization technique. Computing and Visualization in Science. 11, pp. 193- 206.
  11. FLUENT, ver. 12.1, ANSYS Inc., Southpointe, 275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317, 2006.
  12. Forrester, A.I.J., and Keane, A.J., 2009, Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 45, no. 1-3, pp. 50-79.
  13. Goldschmied, F.R., 1966, Integrated hull design, boundary-layer control, and propulsion of submerged bodies, J. Hydronautics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 2-11.
  14. Huang, T. T., Liu, H. L., Groves, N. C., Forlini, T. J., Blanton, J. N., and Gowing, S., 1992, Measurements of flows over an axisymmetric body with various appendages (DARPA SUBOFF Experiments), In Proceedings of the 19th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea.
  15. ICEM CFD, ver. 12.1, ANSYS Inc., Southpointe, 275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317, 2006.
  16. Jagadeesh, P., Murali, K., Idichandy, V.G., 2009, Experimental investigation of hydrodynamic force coefficients over auv hull form, Ocean Engineering, vol. 36, pp. 113-118.
  17. Koziel, S., Bandler, J.W., and Madsen, K., 2006, A Space Mapping Framework for Engineering Optimization: Theory and Implementation. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., 54(10), pp. 3721-3730.
  18. Koziel, S., and Bandler, J.W., 2010a, Recent advances in space-mapping-based modeling of microwave devices. International Journal of Numerical Modelling, (23) 6, pp. 425-446
  19. Koziel, S., 2010b, Shape-preserving response prediction for microwave design optimization. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory and Tech., 58(11), pp. 2829-2837.
  20. Koziel, S., 2010c, Multi-fidelity multi-grid design optimization of planar microwave structures with Sonnet, International Review of Progress in Applied Computational Electromagnetics, Tampere, Finland, April 26-29, pp. 719-724.
  21. Leifsson, L., and Koziel, S., 2010, Multi-fidelity design optimization of transonic airfoils using physics-based surrogate modeling and shape-preserving response prediction, Journal of Computational Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 98-106.
  22. Lepine, J., Guibault, F., Trepanier, J.-Y., and Pepin, F., 2001, Optimized nonuniform rational b-spline geometrical representation for aerodynamic design of wings, AIAA Journal, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 2033-2041.
  23. Lutz, Th., and Wagner, S., 1998, Numerical shape optimization of natural laminar flow bodies, In Proceedings of the 21st ICAS Congress, Sept. 13-18, Melbourne, Australia.
  24. Myring, D.F., 1976, A theoretical study of body drag in subcritical axisymmetric flow, Aeronautical Quarterly, vol. 28, pp. 186-194.
  25. Parsons, J.S., Goodson, R.E., and Goldschmied, F.R., 1974, Shaping of axisymmetric bodies for minimum drag in incompressible flow, J. Hydronautics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 100-107.
  26. Queipo, N. V., Haftka, R. T., Shyy, W., Goel, T., Vaidynathan, R., and Tucker, P.K., 2005, SurrogateBased Analysis and Optimization. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 41(1), pp. 1-28.
  27. Simpson, T. W., Peplinski, J., Koch, P.N., Allen, J.K., 2001, Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations. Engineering with Computers. 17, pp. 129-150.
  28. Solov'ev, S. A., 2009, Determining the shape of an axisymmetric body in a viscous incompressible flow on the basis of the pressure distribution on the body surface, J. of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 927-935.
  29. Søndergaard, J., 2003, Optimization using surrogate models - by the space mapping technique. Ph.D. Thesis, Informatics and Mathematical Modelling, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby.
  30. Tannehill, J.A., Anderson, D.A., and Pletcher, R.H., 1997, Computational fluid mechanics and heat transfer, 2nd edition, Taylor & Francis.
  31. Yang, C., and Löhener, R., 2003, Prediction of flows over an axisymmetric body with appendages, The 8th International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Sept. 22-25, Busan, Korea.
  32. Yamamoto, I., 2007, Research and development of past, present, and future auv technologies, in Proc. Int. Mater-class AUV Technol. Polar Sci. - Soc. Underwater Technol., Mar. 28-29, pp.17-26.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Leifsson L., Koziel S. and Ogurtsov S. (2011). MULTI-FIDELITY DESIGN OPTIMIZATION OF AXISYMMETRIC BODIES IN INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW . In Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications - Volume 1: SDDOM, (SIMULTECH 2011) ISBN 978-989-8425-78-2, pages 465-473. DOI: 10.5220/0003646104650473

in Bibtex Style

author={Leifur Leifsson and Slawomir Koziel and Stanislav Ogurtsov},
booktitle={Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications - Volume 1: SDDOM, (SIMULTECH 2011)},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications - Volume 1: SDDOM, (SIMULTECH 2011)
SN - 978-989-8425-78-2
AU - Leifsson L.
AU - Koziel S.
AU - Ogurtsov S.
PY - 2011
SP - 465
EP - 473
DO - 10.5220/0003646104650473