ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RELATIONSA Case Study

Anrieta Draganova, Patrick Doran

Abstract

The study investigates the relationship between university and industries in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The research calls for building a bridge between universities and industries and rallies for enhanced “cogency” of information technology education, strengthening the academia to industry partnership. This was influenced by discussions with female Emirati undergraduates at Zayed University in Dubai in 2009, where graduates from the College of Information Technology proposed means to initiate creating feasible and sustaining links between local tertiary educational institutions and local industries. Approaches were used to support collaboration between academia and industry, and college programs were employed to narrow the gap between university education and industry. Undergraduate programs need to adapt to industry to ensure graduates gain industry-demanded skills and experience. The investigation suggests that practical and constructive measures are to be taken to effectively develop collaboration between university and industries.

References

  1. Akili, W., 2005. The Quest for Relevance: Roles for Colleges of Engineering and Industry in the Arab Gulf States, Procedures of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference.
  2. Akili, W., 2000. The pros and cons of engineering education in the Arab Gulf States: Views and perceptions of industrial leaders, In-house document, University of Qatar.
  3. Alwan, M. and Cheikh-Obeid, N., “Collaboration between Educational & Research Institutes & Industry in Developing Countries: Experience of Syria and HIAST”, Conference on Scientific Research Outlook in the Arab World in the New Millennium, Sharjah, UAE, 2000. http://nmit.georgetown.edu/papers/al wanobeid.htm
  4. Azaroff, L., 1982, Industry-University Collaboration: How to make it work. Research Management.
  5. Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R. , 1999. Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly.
  6. Bright, A., 1994. Teaching and learning in the engineering Clinic Program at Harvey Mudd College, Proceedings for Advances in Capstone Education, Fostering Industrial relations.
  7. Burn, G. and Robert, R., 2005. Supported Workplace Learning: acknowledge transfer paradigm. Policy Futures in Education.
  8. Dasgupta, P., and David, P., 1994. Towards a New Economics of Science, Research Policy.
  9. Draganova, A., 2010. The Need for Improvement of IT Teaching, Proceedings of the Tenth International Educational Technology Conference.
  10. Etzkowitz, H., et.al. 2000. The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy.
  11. Etzkowitz, H, el.al. 2005. Towards “meta innovation” in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy.
  12. Etzkowitz, H, el.al. 2005. Towards “meta innovation” in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy.
  13. Fontana, R., Geuna, A., and Matt, M., 2006, Factors affecting university-industry research and development projects: The importance of searching, screening and signaling. Research Policy.
  14. Gulbrandsen, M., Smeby, J., 2005, Industry funding and university professors' research performance, Research Policy.
  15. Guston, D., Kenniston, K., 1994, Introduction: the social contract for science. In Guston and Kenniston (Eds.), The Fragile Contract. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.
  16. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A., and Trajtenberg, M., 1998. Universities as a source of commercial technology: A detailed analysis of university patenting. Review of Economics and Statistics.
  17. Hutt, M., Stafford, E., Walker, B., and Reingen, P., 2000. Case Study: Defining the Social Network of a Strategic Alliance. Sloan Management Review.
  18. Keen, P., 1991. Relevance and rigor in information systems research: Improving quality, confidence, cohesion and impact. In information systems research. Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions. Elsevier Science Publishers.
  19. Lall, S., 2002. Science and technology in Southeast Asia. EU Strata Meeting.
  20. Martin, B., 2003. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. In Geuna, A., Salter, A. and Steinmueller W. Science and Innovation. Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance.
  21. Nelson, R., 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis.
  22. Ormerod, R., 1996. Combining management consultancy and research. Omega, International Journal of Management Science.
  23. Reynolds, P., 2004. Overview: Life Context and Personal Background, Chapter 1. Handbook of Entrepreneurial Dynamics: The Process of Organizational Creation. Sage Publications.
  24. Sheikh Mohammed at the ceremony to the country's 39th National Day, (http://www.zu.ac.ae) December, 2010.
  25. Shane, S. and Somaya, D., 2007, The effects of patent litigation on university licensing efforts. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.
  26. Tawfiq, I., and Al Awlama, 1999, “Globalization - Political Dimensions and Repercussions, An Initial Vision from a Political Science Perspective”.
  27. Teece, D., 1986, Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration collaboration, licensing and public policy, Research Policy.
  28. University of Sharjah, “Engineering Education: Building Partnership with Government, Industry & Society”, Sharjah, UAE, 14-15 October 2003. Available at: http://www.sharjah.ac.ae/academic/ engineering/forum2003/introduction.htm
  29. Van Dierdonck, R., 1988. Academic entrepreneurship at Belgian universities. Research and Development Management.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Draganova A. and Doran P. (2011). ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RELATIONSA Case Study . In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Innovative Developments in ICT - Volume 1: INNOV, ISBN 978-989-8425-67-6, pages 71-76. DOI: 10.5220/0004471900710076


in Bibtex Style

@conference{innov11,
author={Anrieta Draganova and Patrick Doran},
title={ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RELATIONSA Case Study},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Innovative Developments in ICT - Volume 1: INNOV,},
year={2011},
pages={71-76},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004471900710076},
isbn={978-989-8425-67-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Innovative Developments in ICT - Volume 1: INNOV,
TI - ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RELATIONSA Case Study
SN - 978-989-8425-67-6
AU - Draganova A.
AU - Doran P.
PY - 2011
SP - 71
EP - 76
DO - 10.5220/0004471900710076